“Nothing Gold Can Stay”
Though Robert Frost’s poem Nothing Gold Can Stay has a deeper meaning in the context of nature and life, it has never been more apt than now for the yellow metal. Frost writes that the golden hue lasts “only so an hour.” Historically, gold has been the most desired metal given its sheen and value, but it seems to have lost its lustre in recent times as an investment option.
Gold’s attributes including malleability, resistance to corrosion and tarnishing, and glitter makes it ideal for many jewelry purposes. But there is more to gold; and that is the opportunity that the metal provides for investors. Gold investors buy gold bullion, official coins as a hedge against inflation or a safeguard against the collapse of paper assets such as stocks, bonds and other financial instruments.
Gold ETFs (Exchange-Traded Funds) have also become very popular as an investment option. Gold ETFs are units representing physical gold, which may be in paper or dematerialized form and are traded on the exchange like a single stock of any company. Governments, central banks and other official institutions hold significant quantities of gold as a component of exchange reserves.
Gold Mining Industry – A Brief Overview
Gold exploration and mining is a time consuming and expensive endeavor. Given its scarcity and remote location of deposits, exploration for new gold deposits is difficult. Once an economically viable deposit is identified, bringing a mine on line can take a decade or more, and it requires substantial capital investment.
Moreover, the mining industry is subject to several risks and hazards such as political conflicts, environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unexpected geological conditions, labour disruptions, unavailability of materials and equipment, weather conditions, pit wall failures, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding, seismic activity and water conditions. However, once the mine development project is successful, returns can be enormously high, which more than offsets the risks and the capital invested.
Industry Ranking & Outlook – Negative
Within the Zacks Industry classification, the gold industry falls under the broader Basic Materials sector (one of 16 Zacks sectors). We rank all of the more than 260 industries in the 16 Zacks sectors based on the earnings outlook for the constituent companies in each industry. This ranking is available in the Zacks Industry Rank page.
The way to align the ranking and outlook from complete list of Zacks Industry Rank for the 260+ companies is that the outlook for the top one-third of the list (Zacks Industry Rank of #87 and lower) is positive, while the outlook for the bottom one-third (Zacks Industry Rank #174 and higher) is negative. Currently, the gold mining industry is featuring in lowest tier with a Zacks Industry Rank of #190, indicating the outlook is on the negative side. In the past week, the industry has slipped 81 positions.
Please note that the Zacks Rank for stocks, which are at the core of our Industry Outlook, has an impressive track record, verified by outside auditors, to foretell stock prices, particularly over the short term (1 to 3 months). The rank, along with Expected Surprise Prediction (ESP) helps in predicting the probability of earnings surprises.
There is a lot of buzz in recent days surrounding gold prices. Let's look at the driving factors, recent trends and the road ahead:
What Affects Gold Prices?
Gold prices fluctuate on a daily basis and are influenced by industrial and jewelry demand, demand for gold as an investment, central bank lending, sales and purchase of gold, volume of recycled material available in the market, speculative trading; and costs and levels of global gold production by gold producers.
There are a number of economic factors as well that influence gold prices. Over the past few years, the price of gold has shown a high inverse correlation with the U.S. dollar. In the wake of dollar weakness, investors opt for gold as a safe haven. Other factors include expectations of the future rate of inflation, interest rates; and global or regional, and political or economic uncertainties.
The Gold Price Drama: Behind the Scenes
Highlights/Major Upheavals: Alarming Drop Witnessed in April; Lowest Price in Three Years in June.
Drivers: Taper or No Taper, U.S.-Syrian crisis, U.S. Government Partial Shutdown
In 2012, gold’s average market price of $1,669 per ounce was an all-time record high, representing a 6% annual increase. A weak dollar, lingering concerns about Europe’s financial problems, China’s reduced economic growth and announcement of the third round of quantitative easing (QE3) led to a surge in gold prices.
In 2013, it was not one event that affected the gold market. A combination of factors contributed -- the Federal Reserve’s taper or no taper confusion, conflict in Syria, mine supply, Indian and Chinese demand and the latest U.S. government imbroglio -- to affecting gold prices. Let us have a look at the dramatic events in detail that pushed the gold prices chart downhill through the year.
Gold prices started slipping in the first quarter of 2013 as the U.S economy started showing signs of a revival. As mentioned earlier, the strengthening of the US dollar has an inverse relationship with gold prices. Monetary easing in Japan led to dollar’s strength.
A decline in inflation level across the globe also reduced gold’s value as a hedge against rising prices. Furthermore, anticipation that Fed’s QE3 could end soon also influenced the fall. In the first quarter of 2013, gold prices ranged from $1,574 per ounce to $1693.75 per ounce, with average gold price at $1,631.8 per ounce.
The blow came in April with the news that Cyprus will sell gold from its reserves as part of a European Union (EU) bailout package. This led investors to offload their positions in gold, leading to the 9% drop in one day to $1,395 per ounce on Apr 12 -- the biggest loss in a day since 1983.
In June, reports that the Fed was contemplating “tapering” its $85 billion of bond purchases every month, which would begin toward the end of this year, sent gold prices to the nadir in 2013 of $1,192 per ounce on Jun 28. This level was last seen in Aug 2010. Overall, in the second quarter, gold prices displayed volatility and swayed between $1,192 and $1,583.5 per ounce with an average of $1,414.8 per ounce.
In the third quarter, gold prices have remained in the range of $1,212.7 to $1,419.5 per ounce. In July, gold prices remained range bound within $1212 to $1,335, supported by a surge in demand for jewellery, bars and coins in India and China due to lower prices. In late August, gold prices trended higher as gold regained its status as a safe investment hedge amid fears and uncertainty surrounding a possible US-led military attack on Syria.
However, the sheen was short-lived as prices soon reversed its course, dipping in September as gold’s safe-haven demand waned on expectations that military intervention in Syria could be avoided. With Syria agreeing to hand over its chemical weapons to international control at Russia's request, the prospects of U.S. military attack faded. Traders who took long positions in gold on hopes that the U.S. would attack Syria, continued to offload their positions.
Gold’s losing streak continued on speculations of the outcome of the FOMC meeting with increased bets on Fed tapering. The Federal Reserve turned the tables on Sep 18 at its FOMC meeting by announcing that it will not taper the easy monetary policy. This gave the yellow metal a fresh lease of life, leading to a buying spree and surging $64.50 or 5% in a day on Sep 19. This marked the maximum gain in the year so far.
Gold prices also found support on the news that former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers has pulled out of the race to fill the Fed chair after Bernanke steps down in Jan 2014. Summers was seen as being in favor of scaling back the $85 billion bond buyback program more quickly than the other candidates. With Summers out of contention, as per latest reports, President Obama will nominate current Federal Reserve vice-chairman Janet Yellen as chairman of the Federal Reserve.
However, more than half of the gains were eroded as James Bullard, chief executive officer and president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, said that the Fed could consider a small taper at its next meeting in October if it is backed with strong economic data. This prompted a wave of selling in gold.
Amid all this, the most dramatic development was the U.S government’s partial shutdown from Oct 1. The shutdown, the first one in 17 years, resulted from the Congress failing to pass a budget before the start of the financial year on Oct 1 due to an intense power struggle over President Obama’s health care law aimed at extending insurance to millions without coverage.
Gold incurred a significant loss to close at below $1,300 per ounce, a seven-week low based on the expectation that it will be a temporary disruption. This confused gold traders as the shutdown did not drive safe-haven bids for the metal as normally expected.
The tussle between the U.S. political parties over the budget raises concerns that the government may default on its debt. Possibilities to increase the $16.7 trillion debt ceiling would be discussed on Oct 17.
However, Treasury Secretary Jack Lew warned that the United States will run out of its ability to borrow money on Oct 17, and with a cash position of only $30 billion and obligations that can run to $60 billion a day, it will put the nation at a risk of sovereign debt default. This unprecedented event is most likely to have catastrophic consequences on the U.S. economy and other parts of the world.
Gold prices firmed higher the next day as uncertainties surrounding the debt ceiling lured traders back to the metal. Furthermore, lower-than-expected private-sector job report drove the gold prices higher as the dollar slumped against rival currencies amid budget woes. However, gold ended in red last week as the U.S. dollar bounced from an eight-month low logged a day earlier.
The U.S. Labor Department delayed its jobs report for the last month, originally scheduled for release on Friday, as the shutdown entered its fourth day. Furthermore, gold demand was affected during the week due to week-long national holiday in China.
All eyes will now be on Oct 17, the crucial day for lifting the U.S. debt ceiling. Focus will also be on the FOMC meeting, scheduled for Oct 29-30, on whether Fed would consider a small taper.
What Lies Ahead
To date gold has dipped 24% from its all-time high in Sept 2011 when it touched $1,921 per ounce. This drop has technically put the yellow metal into the quagmire of a bear market.
Analysts continue to see rough days ahead for gold. They have cut down their estimates for 2013 as well as for 2014, and their price expectation ranges from as low as $1,000 per ounce to $1446 in 2013. For 2014, the scenario is not expected to improve much with price expectations lying between $1050 and $1435.
The U.S. government was last shutdown 17 years ago from Dec 16, 1995 to Jan 6, 1996. A look at the then price chart reveals a rise in gold prices from about $387 to $396 during the closure period. However, this might not be the case this time as the other factors influencing the gold price are different.
The recent decline in prices has dealt a severe blow to investors’ confidence for the yellow metal and it may take many months to restore. Even though it has resulted in major losses in the paper gold market, it has otherwise triggered a gold rush for the actual physical metal in the form of bullion, jewelry, bars and coins. Thus, gold prices will get support from retail demand for gold, particularly in India and China. Gold traders are eyeing an increase in physical demand from Asia, particularly from India due to the upcoming festive demand.
The stalemate situation in Washington with no immediate solution in sight, delay in U.S. economic data due to the suspension of Federal government services and debt woes will impact gold prices. A prolonged shutdown (already entered the ninth day) will have a negative effect on the U.S. GDP and may delay Fed’s tapering decision, which will act in favor of gold.
Furthermore, the nomination of Janet Yellen, the key architect of the stimulus program along with Bernanke, will bring back confidence in the market, if confirmed by the Senate. Yellen has been a strong supporter of easy monetary policy and it is expected that she will not bring major changes to Fed’s policies in this turbulent times. This will improve investor sentiment and might support gold prices.
Total gold demand stood at 856 tons in the second quarter of 2013, down 12% as substantial net outflow from gold ETFs offset record investment in gold bars and coins.
Jewelry demand soared to 575 tons in the quarter, the highest level for five years and up 37% year over year catapulted by lower price levels. Despite the lower prices, demand in value terms surged 20% to $21.8 billion, which is the fourth highest on record. The trend had picked up from the first quarter of 2013 and India and China (60% of the global jewelry demand) continued to be at the forefront with respective annual growth of 51% and 54%, respectively.
In India and China, a growing middle class, inflation expectations triggered the demand in order to capitalize on the low prices and expectations of an increase in the future. Particularly, in China, the poorly performing stock market, concerns over the possibility of a domestic credit crisis and economic slowdown also helped the cause.
Markets improved in other parts of the world as well, particularly in the U.S. U.S. delivered yet another quarter of growth. In the first quarter, jewellery demand has increased after a hiatus of seven years, fueled by positive signs of the U.S recovery and lower prices. Demand had been low due to weak consumer sentiment against a backdrop of high unemployment, falling real wages and rising gold prices. However, Europe was the only exception – not a surprise given the uncertain economic scenario in the region.
Demand for gold bars and coins stood at 508 tons, up 78% year over year. Demand topped the 500 ton benchmark in a quarter for the first time driven by China and India. Overall, global consumer demand for gold (jewelry and bar and coin) surged 53% year over year to 1,083 tons in the quarter.
Technology demand was stable at 104 tons, edging up 1% year over year. Growth in electronics and other industrial and decorative purpose was partially offset by continued decline in dental demand due to shift toward more affordable alternatives.
Central banks remained the primary purchasers of gold, completing their tenth consecutive quarter of net purchases, accounting for around 8% of total gold demand at 71 tons. The purchasing has, however, declined from 109.7 tons in the first quarter and 164.5 tons in the prior-year quarter; reflecting the volatile price movements during the quarter, weakness in emerging market currencies and the declining rate of growth in foreign exchange reserves among some banks.
On the contrary, the quarter witnessed a record 402.2 tons net outflow from gold ETFs. This led to overall investment demand decline of 63%. The bridge between investors at the retail level and the investment level was never so apparent. Retail investors (in gold bars and coins) view gold for preserving wealth and hedging against inflation over the long term. Thus, in the second quarter, demand from retail investors leaped to unprecedented levels as they saw an opportunity to add to their holdings as gold prices dipped.
On the other hand, the institutional investors have a different perception with a short-term, speculative approach. Expectations of the US government tapering quantitative easing by the end of 2013 led to ETF investors losing confidence in gold as a safe haven. The price drop in the quarter prompted these opportunistic investors to sell their ETF holdings and shift to other investment options.
The official sector and emerging markets remain the long-term drivers of demand for gold. Following the recession in 2008, gold investment in Europe and the US was reinvigorated. However, the two Asian giants -- China and India -- will dominate the consumer demand for gold over the next few quarters. This marks a geographical shift from West to East.
A combination of current mine production, recycling and draw-down of existing gold stocks held by governments, financial institutions, industrial organizations and private individuals constitute the annual gold supply.
In the second quarter, mine production was at 732 tons, up 4% year over year led by expansion in a number of small- to medium-sized operations in China. Production increased in the Dominican Republic fuelled by Barrick Gold Corp’s (ABX - Analyst Report) Pueblo Viejo mine and in Brazil.
Indonesia, Peru and Ghana were the regions that witnessed decline in mine production. Even though the impact of price changes on mine production has been slow historically, the steep drop in the second quarter has led to knee-jerk reactions among gold producers. Spending cuts and the closure of cost-intensive operations may impact the supply pipeline by the end of this year.
Over the last five years, recycling has generated around 40% of total supply. Supply from this sector is highly price sensitive. Drop in gold prices led to a decline in recycling activity as consumers are less inclined to part with their stocks at lower prices.
Recycling of gold contributed 308.3 tons to total supply in the second quarter, 21% lower year over year, the fifth consecutive quarter of annual decline. Overall, gold supply dipped 6% to 1,025.5 tons, dragged down by lower recycling activity.
Performance of Gold Companies
As we delve into the June-end quarterly numbers of the gold companies in our coverage – Barrick Gold Corporation, Harmony Gold Mining Co.Ltd (HMY - Analyst Report), Newmont Mining Corp. (NEM - Analyst Report), Kinross Gold Corp. (KGC - Analyst Report), Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd (AEM - Analyst Report) and Goldcorp Inc. (GG - Analyst Report), we see earnings have taken a beating across the board due to the decline in average realized gold prices.
Shares of Newmont, Barrick Gold, Kinross, Goldcorp, Agnico Eagle and Harmony Gold hit their 52-week lows in the Jun-Aug 2013 timeframe driven by the low gold prices, second quarter results and trimmed guidance.
Furthermore, the companies are also riddled with their individual operational issues. Barrick’s stock had fallen under pressure following the announcement that the company is suspending construction at its Pascua-Lama mine in Chile, in response to a court order from a Chilean court citing environmental concerns. However, in September, the Supreme Court of Chile issued a ruling which upheld the environmental approval for the Pascua-Lama project in Chile.
The Pascua-Lama mine, located at the Chile–Argentina border, is one of the world’s largest gold and silver resources with nearly 18 million ounces of proven and probable gold reserves, and an anticipated mine life of 25 years. Barrick incurred $5.1 billion in asset impairment charges against the carrying value of the Pascua-Lama project in the second quarter.
The price decline added to the woes of the industry that is already grappling with rising costs, labor issues, strikes, delays and/or the cancellation of projects. This has put gold miners on the defensive, forcing them to cut costs.
If prices fall further, margins will be constrained as the price of gold closes in on the cost per ounce of the companies. Analysing the all-in sustaining costs (total costs associated with producing gold), 2013 guidance of Barrick Gold, Newmont, Kinross, Goldcorp, Agnico Eagle, IAMGOLD Corp. (IAG) ranges from $900 to a maximum of $1250 per ounce. If prices fall beyond the lowest level of $1192, recorded in June, it will erode the margins of these companies.
The Survival Tactics
Barrick, Harmony, Goldcorp, Newmont, Kinross, Agnico-Eagle have decided to curtail their capital spending for the year. Barrick Gold has hived off its oil and gas unit, Barrick Energy, and three of its Australian mines to offload underperforming assets.
Goldcorp postponed non-essential infrastructure and non-critical path activities at Cerro Negro project, Argentina, until 2014 and 2015, respectively, owing to lower metals prices.
Kinross does not expect to make a decision now on whether to proceed with a potential Tasiast mill expansion until 2015 at the earliest, regardless of the project feasibility study outcome. The study is expected to complete in the first quarter of 2014. The decision was part of the company’s focus on capital reduction in the current lower gold price environment.
IAMGOLD announced that its joint venture with AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. (AU - Snapshot Report) and the government of Mali will suspend mining excavation activities at the Yatela mine in Mali, effective Sep 30, 2013. The decision was triggered by rising costs and falling gold prices, which made it extremely difficult to extend the mine’s life. Moreover, the mine has been also viewed as no longer capable of making a positive contribution to any of its stakeholders.
Both IAMGOLD and AngloGold Ashanti hold a 40% stake in the mine. Newmont has signed a letter of intent to divest its Midas operation in Nevada to focus more on its core businesses by disposing its non-core assets. Barrick is reportedly considering a joint venture with Newmont in Nevada to explore means to cut costs.
Barrick reduced the quarterly dividend by 75% to 5 cents per share in order to improve liquidity. Newmont’s board announced third quarter gold-price-linked dividend of 25 cents per share that is based on the average London P.M. Gold Fix. It reflects a 10 cents drop compared with the prior quarter. Kinross’ board of directors suspended the semi-annual dividend in order to reduce its operating and capital costs.
The key to stay afloat in these turbulent times is to identify and reduce discretionary expenses wherever possible, trim capital spending, defer new capital development programs, divest underperforming assets and cut dividends. Once all expenses are reduced to the bone, the only way to survive will be to reduce their expenses by reducing operations. They will be compelled to either shut down or sell mines with the highest operating costs. The eventual decrease in supply may inflate the price of the yellow metal. If prices do not rise in the next 12 months, the miners will need to drastically cut production in order to conserve cash.
The companies should judiciously proceed on only low-risk, high-return Brownfield and the best Greenfield projects. In the falling gold price environment, companies with major projects may require additional debt to complete them. Miners with lower costs, lower levels of debt, and with recently completed new mine development will be able to sustain themselves.
The austerity in the mining sector has led to more measured mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity. Companies have slowed down their deal activities since last year, but Chinese gold miners remained active on the acquisition front. To capitalize on the strong domestic demand for gold, Chinese companies are enhancing their gold resource base by acquiring overseas as well as domestic gold mines.
In 2012, China’s second largest producer, Zijin Mining Group, bought Australia-based Norton Gold Fields and the third largest gold producer, Shandong Gold Group, acquired majority stake in Australia’s Focus Minerals. Australia was a preferred target considering it is the world's second-largest gold producer after China. In China, one deal worth mentioning was of Shandong Gold Mining buying Shandong Shengda Mining for $590 million in Jun 2012.
Lower gold prices seemed to be the triggering force behind the few deals in the first half of 2013, as the companies were able to acquire assets at discounted prices. In May 2013, Shenzhen-listed Shandong Qixing Iron Co. agreed to a conditional $140 million deal to acquire the assets of Australia-listed Stonewall Resources Ltd.
The largest deal in the gold sector in the first half of 2013 was the sale of Mikhail Prokhorov’s 37.8% stake in Polyus Gold International Ltd. for $3.6 billion. Another notable deal in the first half of the year was Hecla Mining Co.’s (HL - Snapshot Report) acquisition of Aurizon Mines Ltd. for $775 million. In August, New Gold, Inc. (NGD - Snapshot Report) took over 86% of exploration company Rainy River Resources Ltd. in a deal valued at about $310 million.
It is clear that for the balance of 2013 and in 2014, M&A activity in the mining industry is expected to remain slow. Deals will come through only when companies have enough cash to seize the opportunity to takeover the assets unloaded by peers in the cost cutting environment. Gold is expected to remain the top commodity for acquisitions in the months ahead and the successful deals will help to shape the future of the mining industry and to determine its key players.
Earnings Performance in 3Q13 and 2Q13
We are still a couple of weeks away from getting into midst of third quarter earnings season. Only 4.2% of the companies in the basic material sector have reported to date. Earnings increased 3.5%, accelerating from the 2% growth recorded in the second quarter by these companies. Revenues went up 4.4%, faring much better than the 0.7% growth in the second quarter. Even though results are tracking better than the previous quarter, it is too early to rejoice.
Looking back at the overall results of the Basic Material Sector in the second quarter, earnings dipped 10.9% in the second quarter of 2013, deteriorating from the 1.6% decline in earnings witnessed in the first quarter of 2013. However, revenues for the sector went down 1.4% in the second quarter, worsening from the flat sales in the first quarter.
Of the companies reported, the Basic Material sector had a beat ratio (percentage of companies coming out with positive surprises) of 0.0%, compared with 100% in the first quarter.
Expectations for 2013 & 2014
The Basic Material sector is one of the sectors experiencing material negative estimate revisions. However, the overall projection of a 5.0% dip in the third quarter paints a somewhat better picture when compared with the 10.9% drop experienced in the second quarter. The sector is expected to return to growth with a 10.8% increase in earnings in the fourth quarter of 2013. Revenues are expected to rise 0.7% in the third quarter and 2.1% in the fourth quarter.
In the first quarter of 2014, the sector’s earnings are expected to rise 11.9% in the first quarter of 2014 despite a rise of a meager 3.3% in revenues. In the second quarter of 2014, earnings are projected to surge 21.9% while revenue is expected to increase by 1.7%.
In 2013, the sector’s earnings is expected to edge up 0.1% while revenues are expected to grow 0.7%. In 2014, earnings growth is projected at 17.9% and revenues at 4.2%.
To Sum Up
Demand for gold will undoubtedly continue to rise in the long term, thanks to the rising middle class in India, China and other emerging markets. The Euro-zone debt crisis will also be an important driver for gold demand. Furthermore, demand for gold bullion and coins are currently at unprecedented levels. It may, however, take months for this new demand to feed into prices, but prices will eventually stabilize.
Investors have fled the mining sector and two things need to happen before investors regain interest in gold mining stocks: gold price needs to rise and the industry needs to rebuild its credibility by delivering on promises of greater shareholder returns. The consumers who rushed to buy gold following the fall in prices might have to wait patiently for their anticipated returns to materialize.
Meanwhile, it remains to be seen how the political turmoil and debt crisis in the U.S. turns out, which will have its effect on the yellow metal. At current levels, one should invest in gold as a long-term investment, which will grow in value and add diversification to a portfolio. For quick returns, it is advisable to focus on other assets.