HOME ZACKS RESEARCH FUNDS PORTFOLIO BROKER RESEARCH MARKETS SCREENING EDUCATION SERVICES
Zacks Rank    Equity Research    Premium Home    My Account    Help    

Earnings Estimates Revisions
They're the most powerful force driving stock prices, and the key to the Zacks Rank's market-beating track record. Click here to learn more.
Quote:
Login Free Membership
Search:

 
Analyst Blog  

Bullish on Biogen Idec

June 01, 2009 | Comments: 6
Recommended this article (6)
BIIB | GENZ | GILD | CELG | PFE | BMY | AZN | NVS | LLY | SNY
Print    Share

At 12.6x our 2009 EPS of $4.10 per share, we believe that Biogen Idec's (BIIB - Analyst Report) stock is too attractive to ignore. This is below the biotech peer-group average, which includes several names trading at a significant premium -- Genzyme (GENZ - Analyst Report), Gilead (GILD - Analyst Report) and Celgene (CELG - Analyst Report).

The company should post non-GAAP EPS up roughly 12% in 2009, even with all the Tysabri PML issues. However, valuation alone is not enough of a reason to buy the stock.  We are comfortable with owning the name here based on two other reasons.

In our opinion, Biogen has the best pipeline in all of biotech. Plus, Biogen has one of the largest biologic manufacturing capacities in the world. There are significant operations on both the East and West Coast of the U.S., as well as internationally. Independent sources (Evaluate Pharma) predict that by 2012, biotechnology products will account for nearly a fourth of the entire market, up from only 16% in 2007.

As large pharmaceutical companies move with greater and greater force into the biologic market, manufacturing capacity and intellectual property become highly coveted assets. Biogen possess perhaps the strongest acquirable biologic platform in the world now that Roche has acquired Genentech and Pfizer (PFE - Analyst Report) is acquiring Wyeth.

When normalcy returns to the financial markets, and well-capitalized large-cap pharmaceutical companies look to go shopping in 2009, we believe Biogen will be at the top of the list. We have already seen three significant deals with Pfizer-Wyeth, Merck-Schering, and Roche-Genentech. Biogen's worldwide Tysabri partner, Elan Pharmaceuticals, is currently negotiating selling a stake to Bristol-Myers (BMY - Analyst Report).

Clearly there is interest from big pharma in biologics. We think Biogen should be at the top of anyone's shopping list. Names including AstraZeneca (AZN - Analyst Report), Novartis (NVS - Snapshot Report), Eli Lilly (LLY - Analyst Report) and Sanofi-Aventis (SNY - Analyst Report) seem to make the most sense.

Today, at less than $52, the name is significantly under-valued. Carl Icahn agrees. Our target is $62 per share.

Email

Print

Share

RSS

Rate Pos

Rate Neg

Comment
Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommended this article (6)
 Posting Comment...
There was a problem posting this this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Comments (Limit 1000 Characters - Used: 0)
Display Name: Email Address:  
 Loading Comments...
152
days
ago
Jason Napodano, CFA wrote...
Thanks for the Q Mac. You've brought up all the key issues. However, despite all these issues, Biogen still generated $1.5B in Op-CF in '08, and $300M in the Q1. The core biz is generating tons of cash, even though both Avonex and Rituxan are older products. However, the reasons I still like Biogen: 1) generating strong CF, 2) undervalued pipeline (galiximab, lumiliximab, ocrelizumab, GA101, BG-12, daclizumab, CDP-323, BIIB-017, BIIB-014, Aviptadil, Adentri, lixivaptan), 3) huge biologic manufacturing capacity, 4) key negatives are known (PML, slowing top-line), 5) cheap valuation. Maybe Carl Icahn is right, and the current mgt. are bums. If so, then the company should be sold - you win. Maybe mgt. will right the ship by doing deals or bringing new pipeline drugs to market - you win. I don't see a lot of downside here. I love recommending stocks where the negatives are easily understandable and priced in, and no one is modeling any upside.
 Loading Report Abuse...
There was a problem reporting abuse for this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Please let us know why you believe this comment is in violation of our community guidelines. Our team will take the appropriate action.
 
152
days
ago
Mac wrote...
good points Jason. I think Biogen is a great company with some serious challenges, but they do have some very prized assets and great global biotech know-how. The future is in their hands, and I am with you, chopping up the company is a ridiculous idea. If this company would get more aggressive with their cash flow, they could be the next genentech.
 Loading Report Abuse...
There was a problem reporting abuse for this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Please let us know why you believe this comment is in violation of our community guidelines. Our team will take the appropriate action.
 
152
days
ago
Jason Napodano, CFA wrote...
And by the way - big pharma rarely (if ever) buys high-flying biotech. In the past, the majority of Big-Pharma / Biotech M&A has been where the biotech was struggling, but had some sort of core technology or asset that Big-Pharma can significantly expand or leverage upon. See: Astra-MedImmune, J&J-Centacor, Lilly-ImClone, Amgen-Immunex, Gilead-CVT, Takeda-Millennium, Glaxo-Sirtris, Abbott-Kos, etc... Biogen is an under-performing company, but absolutely has solid core assets and technology that Big-Pharma can leverage. That's what makes it a takeover candidate.
 Loading Report Abuse...
There was a problem reporting abuse for this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Please let us know why you believe this comment is in violation of our community guidelines. Our team will take the appropriate action.
 
152
days
ago
Jason Napodano, CFA wrote...
Thanks for the Q Mac. Youve brought up all the key issues. However, despite all these issues, Biogen still generated $1.5B in Op-CF in 08, and $300M in the Q1. The core biz is generating tons of cash, even though both Avonex and Rituxan are older products. However, the reasons I still like Biogen: 1) generating strong CF, 2) undervalued pipeline (galiximab, lumiliximab, ocrelizumab, GA101, BG-12, daclizumab, CDP-323, BIIB-017, BIIB-014, Aviptadil, Adentri, lixivaptan), 3) huge biologic manufacturing capacity, 4) key negatives are known (PML, slowing top-line), 5) cheap valuation. Maybe Carl Icahn is right, and the current mgt. are bums. If so, then the company should be sold ? you win. Maybe mgt. will right the ship by doing deals or bringing new pipeline drugs to market ? you win. I don?t see a lot of downside here. I love recommending stocks where the negatives are easily understandable and priced in, and no one is modeling any upside.
 Loading Report Abuse...
There was a problem reporting abuse for this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Please let us know why you believe this comment is in violation of our community guidelines. Our team will take the appropriate action.
 
152
days
ago
Mac wrote...
Jason,Avonex is old and there is a lot of competition on the way, by oral drugs no less. Tysabri is plagued by safety concerns regarding PML and even though it is looking better, it is still not taking off. Rituxan has new PML concerns, competition on the way, and revenue should start slowly dropping due to rest of world royalty payments being cut. Biogen has no business development strength of late, and is in desperate need to generate new revenue over the next few years. Why do you think a big pharma company would pay a big premium for biogen at this time? It looks like the company should have been bought 4 or 5 years ago, not now.
 Loading Report Abuse...
There was a problem reporting abuse for this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Please let us know why you believe this comment is in violation of our community guidelines. Our team will take the appropriate action.
 
<< Previous 5View AllNext 5 >>

More Zacks Resources

Market Summary Nov 08, 2009 00:48 am ET
DJIA 10023.42  17.46 0.17%
NASD 2112.44  7.12 0.34%
S&P 500 1069.3  2.67 0.25%
Sponsored Links