HOME ZACKS RESEARCH FUNDS PORTFOLIO BROKER RESEARCH MARKETS SCREENING EDUCATION SERVICES
Zacks Rank    Equity Research    Premium Home    My Account    Help    


Losing Stock Guy: Why He Went Wrong

By Kevin Matras
Quote:
Login Free Membership
Search:

 
Analyst Blog  

Q1 More Productive

June 04, 2009 | Comments: 0
Recommended this article (1)
PG | DLM | WGO | HOG
Print    Share

Productivity is the ultimate determinate of our standard of living. If real GDP rises, but does so at less than the rate of population growth, then per capita GDP will fall. In the short term, it can be affected by changes in the proportion of people working, but over the long term increasing output per hour worked is the only way to make a society more wealthy.

Thus the news that in the first quarter grew at 1.6%, rather than the 0.8% originally estimated, is very welcome news. The consensus expectation was that it would be revised up, but only to 1.2%. Both output and hours worked were down in the quarter, but hours worked fell more than output, leading to better productivity.

It appears that within the numbers though there were some serious divergences, with productivity up at 1.8% for the whole business sector, but up 1.6% for the non-farm business sector. This would imply that things are going very well down on the farm given the relatively small size of farming in the current economy.

The service sector far outperformed manufacturing since manufacturing productivity was down 2.7% in the quarter. Within manufacturing, there was a serious divergence between durable goods, where productivity plunged 10.4%, and non-durable manufacturing, where it rose 1.9%. Manufacturing productivity is always more volatile than service sector productivity, but this is a big, big difference, especially with durable goods.

Part of that is due to the inherently more unstable nature of manufacturing, particularly durable goods relative to services, and part is due to different methods the government uses to do the calculations. However, the same calculations are done for durables and non-durables.

This data clearly indicates that non-durable firms should be doing better than durable goods firms. Stick to firms where people need to buy the stuff on a regular basis, not things that can easily be put off. For example, stick with firms like Procter & Gamble (PG - Analyst Report) and Del Monte (DLM - Analyst Report), not Winnebago (WGO - Snapshot Report) or Harley Davidson (HOG - Snapshot Report).

Email

Print

Share

RSS

Rate Pos

Rate Neg

Comment
Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommended this article (1)
 Posting Comment...
There was a problem posting this this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Comments (Limit 1000 Characters - Used: 0)
Display Name: Email Address:  
 Loading Comments...
Be the first to comment on this article!
Best Stocks. Best Insight. Join Now...it's FREE!
Over 550,000 investors look forward to the timely insights in our email newsletter; Zacks Profit from the Pros. In each daily issue you will find:
  • Free  Four Zacks #1 Rank "Strong Buy" Stocks
  • Free  Timely Market Commentary
  • Free  Wealth Management Tips
  • Free  Profitable Strategy Screens
  • Free  Bull and Bear Stocks of the Day
Zacks FREE Registration

More Zacks Resources

Market Summary Nov 26, 2009 11:28 am ET
DJIA 10464.4  30.69 0.29%
NASD 2176.05  6.87 0.32%
S&P 500 1110.63  4.98 0.45%
Sponsored Links