HOME ZACKS RESEARCH FUNDS PORTFOLIO BROKER RESEARCH MARKETS SCREENING EDUCATION SERVICES
Zacks Rank    Equity Research    Premium Home    My Account    Help    
A Better Way to Make Money in Today's Market
Learn more now >>
Quote:
Login Free Membership
Search:

 
Analyst Blog  

Amylin Update Post ADA Meeting

June 08, 2009 | Comments: 2
Recommended this article (2)
AMLN | MRK | GSK | BMY | LLY
Print    Share

This past weekend, Amylin Pharmaceuticals (AMLN - Analyst Report) presented several abstracts and oral presentations at the American Diabetes Association (ADA) meeting in New Orleans. At the meeting, Amylin presented long-term follow-up data from the 74-week open label portion of the DURATION-1 program that demonstrated clear and sustained improvement in HbA1c for patients taking exenatide once weekly long-acting release (LAR).

The data also show improvements in fasting plasma glucose and weight loss while on LAR. Data from the previously reported DURATION-2 program also demonstrate that once weekly LAR offers greater glycemic control, with an added weight loss benefit over Takeda’s Actos and Merck’s (MRK - Analyst Report) Januvia. Exenatide LAR remains extremely well positioned to capture significant market share in the type-2 diabetes market if it is approved in March 2010.

"If" remains the operative word, however. Lingering concerns over the potential that exenatide causes pancreatitis, and newly found fears on potentially increased risk in C-cell malignant carcinoma of the thyroid in the GLP-1 class, have knocked Byetta (exenatide twice daily injection) significantly down off its previous growth trajectory.

Amylin management presented interim results from a retrospective safety analysis at ADA, seemingly quashing the pancreatitis risk. Data on over 25k patients taking Byetta shows no significant increased risk of developing pancreatitis at the 95% confidence interval. Still, however, the big risk to Amylin’s stock is that FDA may ask for additional data on the LAR formulation prior to granting approval.

Longer-term, intense competition in type-2 diabetes market may limit Amylin’s profitability. In the next few years, the potential exists that we will see up to three more GLP-1 molecules: Novo’s Victoza (liraglutide), Glaxo’s (GSK - Analyst Report) Syncira (albiglutide), and Roche’s Ipsen (taspoglutide), plus another DPP-IV inhibitor in Bristol’s (BMY - Analyst Report) Onglyza (saxagliptin) on the market. We note that Glaxo’s Syncira, currently in the initial stages of a phase III program, is also a once weekly injection.

However, the most concerning potential competitor is Amylin’s current partner on LAR, Eli Lilly (LLY - Analyst Report). At ADA, Lilly presented positive data from a phase II program called GBCJ demonstrating the effectiveness of its own internally developed GLP-1 molecule, LY2189265. LY2189265 is a once-weekly injection a novel-engineered fusion protein, consisting of a dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DDP-IV) protected GLP-1 analog linked to a fragment of immunoglobulin G4.

Lilly is looking to capitalize on the two newest anti-diabetic classes by  combining them into one molecule. Although LY2189265 is still years away from the market, we question just where Lilly’s loyalty will lie once its own GLP-1 agents are approved and now competing with LAR.

In the meantime, Amylin is focusing on presenting data in support of the LAR NDA, as well as reducing costs and streamlining its organization. Earlier this year, management announced a sales force realignment that resulted in the termination of approximately 200 representatives, or 35% of the sales force. Amylin hopes the newly focused Byetta specialty approach on endocrinologists and diabetes-focused primary care physicians will help improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the alliance with partner Eli Lilly, as well as better position the company for the launch of LAR. Refocusing the efforts on the efficiency and effectiveness of Byetta is a good thing, in our opinion, given all the outside distractions relating to the proxy fight over the past few months.

At the recent shareholder meeting, two large shareholders -- Eastbourne Capital and Carl Icahn -- were successful in getting their own members elected to the Board of Directors. Also, shareholders did not re-elect Joseph C. Cook, Jr., the prior Chairman, and James N. Wilson, Amylin's Lead Independent Director. It is clear that shareholders want a change in direction at Amylin. However, until visibility on LAR improves we continue to see little movement in the stock.

Email

Print

Share

RSS

Rate Pos

Rate Neg

Comment
Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommended this article (2)
 Posting Comment...
There was a problem posting this this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Comments (Limit 1000 Characters - Used: 0)
Display Name: Email Address:  
 Loading Comments...
152
days
ago
Jason Napodano, CFA wrote...
Sarah, I think the biggest risk to Amylin right now is that the FDA delays approval of LAR next March 2010. However, if Amylin does get approval for LAR, then I think we can assume that the agency is less concerned with things like pancreatitis and thyroid cancer being a class effect, and the likelihood that other GLP-1 analogues also make it to the market improves. That's why Amylin's stock went down when the FDA questioned Novo's drug - not up. LAR is a blockbuster, no doubt. The clinical data is excellent. What's holding Amylin's stock down now are the fears on a delay past March 2010 that allows competitors to catch-up with their drugs, Lilly's long-term committment to LAR b/c of their own GLP-1, and the fact that Byetta sales have been a disappointment for the past several quarters. Profitability for Amylin is heavily dependent on LAR. Why buy the stock today when you have, at best, 50/50 chance for approval in March 2010?
 Loading Report Abuse...
There was a problem reporting abuse for this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Please let us know why you believe this comment is in violation of our community guidelines. Our team will take the appropriate action.
 
152
days
ago
Sarah wrote...
Once again, your conclusions are not supported by your premise. If there are concerns about approval of GLP-1 formulations now in the pipeline, how can make the assumption that they will sail through with FDA approval while Exenatide LAR, which has more real experience data than all of them combined, will not? Some are predicting that Novo's entry may be significantly delayed, yet a few weeks ago they were predicting it would be a blockbuster. Face it, you don't know any more than the wizard examining chicken entrails.
 Loading Report Abuse...
There was a problem reporting abuse for this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Please let us know why you believe this comment is in violation of our community guidelines. Our team will take the appropriate action.
 
<< Previous 5View AllNext 5 >>

More Zacks Resources

Market Summary Nov 08, 2009 02:52 am ET
DJIA 10023.42  17.46 0.17%
NASD 2112.44  7.12 0.34%
S&P 500 1069.3  2.67 0.25%
Sponsored Links