HOME ZACKS RESEARCH FUNDS PORTFOLIO BROKER RESEARCH MARKETS SCREENING EDUCATION SERVICES
Zacks Rank    Equity Research    Premium Home    My Account    Help    
What's Up With These Ridiculous Stock Gains?

Steve Reitmeister didn't want me to tell you this. He felt that one strategy's performance stands out so much that... Read on >>
Quote:
Login Free Membership
Search:

 
Analyst Blog  

Another Ugly Jobs Report

July 02, 2009 | Comments: 1
Recommended this article (1)
GPS | LTD | JCP | M
Print    Share

In June, the economy dropped 467,000 jobs, bringing the official (U-3) unemployment rate up to 9.5%, its highest level since the recession of the early 1980’s. In some ways this was a mirror image of the May report, which featured a relatively small decline in jobs (-322,000 revised from an original read of -345,000) but a big jump in the U-3 unemployment rate to 9.4% from 8.9% in April.

June had a much bigger-than-expected loss of jobs (consensus was -367,000), but only a small 0.1% rise in the unemployment rate. The more comprehensive U-6 unemployment rate, which counts discouraged workers and those working part-time because they can't find full time jobs, also rose by 0.1% to 16.5%. A year ago the U-6 rate was 10.1%, so it is up 6.4 points, vs. a 3.9 point rise in the U-3 rate over the last year.

The chart below (from http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/) shows the history of the unemployment rate and the year-over-year rate of jobs growth. While the Reagan Era recession was worse in terms of the unemployment rate (at least to this point), the current downturn has been much worse in terms of actual job losses.



The reason for the small rise in the unemployment rate is that the size of the labor force declined by 155,000 while the number of people not in the workforce increased by 358,000.

There were several other weak elements to this report. The length of the average workweek declined by 0.1 hours to 33.0. While that does not sound like much, when you multiply it by 140.2 million people who are still employed in the country, it adds up to a lot of hours. A year ago the average work week was 33.6 hours. In effect there has been a slight amount of job sharing going on with employers cutting back the hours of everybody to avoid laying off as many people as possible.

Another way to look at this is the ratio of employment-to-population, or the employment rate, which is down to 59.5% -- a decline of 3.2 points since the recession started in December 2007. This is the lowest percentage of Americans working since April 1984.

This downturn has been particularly bad in terms of employment losses and the duration of the losses. The second graph (also from http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/) shows the percentage decline in employment from the peak for this downturn versus every previous one since the end of WWII. The only downturn that produced a greater percentage decline in jobs was in 1948, when we were shifting away from wartime production. The only more persistent downturn was the relatively shallow one of 2001.



Even for those who still have a job, things are not good. Average hourly earnings were unchanged for the month, and with a lower workweek that means that average weekly earnings were down by $1.85. While that is not huge, it does mean that people are not going to be keeping up with inflation.

With less money in their pockets and a change in attitude that favors more savings at the margin, people are going to be shopping less. This seems to me likely to affect some of the mid-range stores more than the discounters or those involved in the carriage trade. I see the continued weak employment situation as a big negative for some of the mall occupants like The Gap (GPS - Analyst Report), Limited (LTD - Snapshot Report) and the anchors like J.C. Penney (JCP - Analyst Report) and Macy’s (M - Snapshot Report).

I will have more analysis of this report later on.

Email

Print

Share

RSS

Rate Pos

Rate Neg

Comment
Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommended this article (1)
 Posting Comment...
There was a problem posting this this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Comments (Limit 1000 Characters - Used: 0)
Display Name: Email Address:  
 Loading Comments...
145
days
ago
Fred L. Mechanical Engineer wrote...
Cap & Trade is what we need to fix this unemploment problem. Do you think I'll need a high school diploma to qualify for one of those new jobs monitoring carbon emmisions at the GE plant? Think of the new jobs in the shipping industry as our factories pack up and head to Mexico or overseas. I can't wait!
 Loading Report Abuse...
There was a problem reporting abuse for this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Please let us know why you believe this comment is in violation of our community guidelines. Our team will take the appropriate action.
 
<< Previous 5View AllNext 5 >>
Best Stocks. Best Insight. Join Now...it's FREE!
Over 550,000 investors look forward to the timely insights in our email newsletter; Zacks Profit from the Pros. In each daily issue you will find:
  • Free  Four Zacks #1 Rank "Strong Buy" Stocks
  • Free  Timely Market Commentary
  • Free  Wealth Management Tips
  • Free  Profitable Strategy Screens
  • Free  Bull and Bear Stocks of the Day
Zacks FREE Registration

More Zacks Resources

Market Summary Nov 26, 2009 06:16 am ET
DJIA 10464.4  30.69 0.29%
NASD 2176.05  6.87 0.32%
S&P 500 1110.63  4.98 0.45%
Sponsored Links