HOME ZACKS RESEARCH FUNDS PORTFOLIO BROKER RESEARCH MARKETS SCREENING EDUCATION SERVICES
Zacks Rank    Equity Research    Premium Home    My Account    Help    

Zacks Equity Research
Zacks Rank can tell you which stocks to buy and sell. Zacks Equity Research tells you why. Click here to learn more.
Quote:
Login Free Membership
Search:

 
Analyst Blog  

Ambac Loss Wider than Expected

By: Zacks Equity Research
November 06, 2009 | Comments: 2
Recommended this article (1)
ABK
Print    Share

Ambac Financial Group’s (ABK - Analyst Report) third-quarter loss of $2.35 per share was wider than the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a loss of $1.22 per share. Last year, the company had reported a loss of $7.81 per share. Losses were driven by higher loss expenses in its Residential Mortgage Backed Securities (RMBS) insured portfolio.
 
Revenues came in at $2.7 billion, compared with negative revenues of $2.3 billion in the prior-year quarter. The improvement in revenues was brought about by $2.9 billion of unrealized gains in credit derivatives.
 
Net premiums earned in the quarter were $238.4 million, down 16% year over year. Normal net premiums amounted to $148.1 million and $155 million in the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
Net investment income was $135 million, representing an increase of 6.3% from $127 million in the comparable period of 2008. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the average yield of the portfolio as the mix of securities has shifted from being primarily tax-exempt to a greater percentage of taxable securities. The impact from increasing yields was partially offset by an overall decrease in the asset base.

Other-than-temporary impairment losses in the financial guarantee investment portfolio amounted to $32.5 million, compared to a net loss of $2.5 million in the third quarter 2008.

Net realized investment gains in the financial guarantee investment portfolio amounted to $92.3 million in the quarter, up 78%, compared to $51.9 million in the year-ago quarter, driven by investment repositioning.
 
Though Ambac saw an improvement in loss and loss expenses for the quarter, going to $459.2 million from $607.7 million a year ago net claims paid totaled $315.1 million in the quarter from $189.2 million last year, with most of the payouts related to RMBS transactions.
 
Book value per share was a negative $9.83, compared with negative $13.17 at Dec 31, 2008. Total stockholders’ equity was a negative $2.2 billion, compared with a negative equity of $3.1 billion in the year earlier period.
 
Since the onset of housing crisis, Ambac has been hit by losses on its coverage of risky financial instruments such as mortgage-backed securities and has been working to reduce its exposure to such debt instruments. We are yet to see any significant positive turnaround in Ambac, neither do we expect any in the near future. While we expect a prolonged environment of uncertainty, we continue to recommend the shares as Neutral.


Email

Print

Share

RSS

Rate Pos

Rate Neg

Comment
Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommended this article (1)
 Posting Comment...
There was a problem posting this this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Comments (Limit 1000 Characters - Used: 0)
Display Name: Email Address:  
 Loading Comments...
14
days
ago
Tom7 wrote...
I still dream of a world where this guys are not listened anymore by the undedicated or unexperienced investor.Its just amazing how the regulators are yet to realise that distorted news from these known houses and their analists are worst than the insider trading phenomena, which, as we all see (thankfully, at last) are sending to jail a few cowboys from the hedge fund industry. Well this peace of news is not distorted, its a plain open lie! Amazing, people still read this.Just a rational idea from an investor to SEC, lawmakers, and regulators out there. Check on all these guys, if we are all to built a mature logical financial system - where madoffs are treated as such - please also regulate and bring some reason to news makers. Its just amazing..think about it
 Loading Report Abuse...
There was a problem reporting abuse for this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Please let us know why you believe this comment is in violation of our community guidelines. Our team will take the appropriate action.
 
14
days
ago
Confused Reader wrote...
This information is different than what was reflected in the 8-K released by AMBAC which stated a gain per share of 7.58. Did Zack, which is suppose to be a trusted source of information, check the data before publishing this article? This article makes me loose faith in Zack's analysts reports
 Loading Report Abuse...
There was a problem reporting abuse for this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Please let us know why you believe this comment is in violation of our community guidelines. Our team will take the appropriate action.
 
<< Previous 5View AllNext 5 >>

More Zacks Resources

Market Summary Nov 21, 2009 07:33 am ET
DJIA 10318.16  -14.28 -0.14%
NASD 2146.04  -10.78 -0.50%
S&P 500 1091.38  -3.52 -0.32%
Sponsored Links