HOME ZACKS RESEARCH FUNDS PORTFOLIO BROKER RESEARCH MARKETS SCREENING EDUCATION SERVICES
Zacks Rank    Equity Research    Premium Home    My Account    Help    

PeopleandPicks.com is Zacks' Community Website
Find great stocks and great stock pickers in our online community. It's social, it's profitable and it's Free! Join the fun at PeopleandPicks.com
Quote:
Login Free Membership
Search:

 
Analyst Blog  

Glaxo Reports Higher Revenues

By: Zacks Equity Research
November 12, 2009 | Comments: 1
Recommended this article (1)
GSK | PFE | BMY | RDY
Print    Share

GlaxoSmithKline, plc (GSK - Analyst Report) reported third quarter income of 92 cents per American Depository Share (ADS), 3 cents below the Zacks Consensus Estimate. The company reported earnings of 94 cents in the year-ago period.

Third quarter 2009 revenue increased 3%, with growth being driven by strong performances in emerging markets (up 25%), Japan (up 19%) and Consumer Healthcare (up 8%). We were pleased to see growth in Consumer Healthcare revenue despite the global slowdown.

Meanwhile, US sales continued to be impacted by generic competition with revenue declining 12%. Sales of products like Imigran (down 74%), Lamictal (down 21%) and Requip (down 30%) and Wellbutrin XL (down 81%) kept declining.

Pharmaceutical product revenue increased 2% with sales being driven by Advair/Seretide (up 5%) and Relenza. Relenza benefited from continued orders from several governments for stockpiling.

Although vaccine sales were lower in the third quarter due to phasing of shipments, we expect strong vaccine segment revenue in the fourth quarter of 2009. In addition to strong influenza product sales, the company has made significant progress in expanding its vaccine product portfolio. The approval of cervical cancer vaccine Cervarix in the US and Japan, H1N1 vaccine Pandemrix in Europe, and the H1N1 vaccine in the US should all help drive vaccine segment revenue.

GlaxoSmithKline continued to make progress with its cost-cutting initiative, which should help offset the impact of increasing generic competition in the next few years and help earnings grow faster than revenues. The company’s restructuring program is expected to deliver £1.7 billion in annual savings. GlaxoSmithKline announced that it has achieved annualized cost savings of about £1 billion.

In our view, GlaxoSmithKline possesses one of the strongest late-stage pipelines in large-cap pharma. We believe that the company remains interested in accelerating growth through acquisitions and partnering arrangements.

The company’s HIV partnership with Pfizer (GSK - Analyst Report) and the Stiefel acquisition are the beginning of a trend which we expect to continue. GlaxoSmithKline has also been active in expanding its presence in emerging markets as evident by its recent deals with companies like Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY - Analyst Report) and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories (RDY - Analyst Report), among others.

Email

Print

Share

RSS

Rate Pos

Rate Neg

Comment
Free Stock Analysis From Zacks
  Includes Zacks Long-Term Recommendation and Target Price
Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommended this article (1)
 Posting Comment...
There was a problem posting this this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Comments (Limit 1000 Characters - Used: 0)
Display Name: Email Address:  
 Loading Comments...
70
days
ago
e wall wrote...
S sales continued to be impacted by generic competition with revenue declining 12%. Sales of products like Imigran (down 74%), Lamictal (down 21%) and Requip (down 30%). I just found out today that my company will not pay for brand Medicine i.e., Lamictal. In September, I paid 58.60 for 30 day supply. Now, 3 months later, I have to pay 456.00 for 3 months supply. This is a far cry from the 161.xx figure. No one can tell me when this company increased their price. I did find out that my company will only pay for generic and I have to pay the co pay plus the difference between generic and brand. It's not just me, but this is happening to a lot of people across the board. A big push for generic. The ones that need medically prescribed meds, are screwed, because Medco has priced it out of reach for the consumer (5.33 a pill.) So, it appears to me that the customer who needs lacmital deemed medically necessary can't afford it. The manufacturer will lose because no one can buy it.
 Loading Report Abuse...
There was a problem reporting abuse for this comment. Please try back later.
[CLICK TO CLOSE X]
Please let us know why you believe this comment is in violation of our community guidelines. Our team will take the appropriate action.
 
<< Previous 5View AllNext 5 >>
Best Stocks. Best Insight. Join Now...it's FREE!
Over 550,000 investors look forward to the timely insights in our email newsletter; Zacks Profit from the Pros. In each daily issue you will find:
  • Free  Four Zacks #1 Rank "Strong Buy" Stocks
  • Free  Timely Market Commentary
  • Free  Wealth Management Tips
  • Free  Profitable Strategy Screens
  • Free  Bull and Bear Stocks of the Day
Zacks FREE Registration

More Zacks Resources

Market Summary Feb 10, 2010 08:48 am ET
DJIA 10058.64  0.00 0.00%
NASD 2151.33  0.46 0.02%
S&P 500 1070  -0.52 -0.05%