Back to top

Analyst Blog

Sejuti Banerjea

Google Wins Big Against Oracle

ORCL

 ZacksTrade Now

This page is temporarily not available.  Please check later as it should be available shortly. If you have any questions, please email customer support at support@zacks.com or call 800-767-3771 ext.  9339.

Google Inc. won the second phase of its trial against Oracle Corp (ORCL - Analyst Report) when a jury voted unanimously in its favor on all eight considerations before it.

The second phase of the trial was about patent infringements, which according to intellectual property experts, constituted the less important part. In fact, patents have shorter lives (owners can cash in on them for 20-odd years) compared to copyrights, which could generate revenue for 95 years or more.

The patents in question related to memory management, computer stacks, compilation and binary objects, to name a few.

The judge dismissed the jury immediately after the verdict, implying that the third phase of the trial, constituting the amount of damages that Google would be called upon to pay would be decided by him alone.

Since Oracle would not receive any damages for patent infringements, the only damages it could be granted would be for copyright infringement, which was determined in the first phase of the trial. 

In the first phase, the jury found that Google had in fact copied 9 lines out of 15 million lines of Java code, or 0.0000%. While they unanimously found Google guilty of doing this, they could not come to a consensus regarding its fair use.

The jury foreman told Bloomberg that he was the only one believing in Google’s guilt from the beginning, but by the end of the trial he managed to convince two others.

The doctrine of fair use dictates that if anyone uses copyrighted work without the consent of the owner for teaching, news reporting or for the creation of something new in the interest of the public, such person would be protected by law.

The fact that Google copied the 9 lines for the purpose of creating a free OS seems to indicate that Google’s actions did serve the public interest. Google had the intention of profiting out of the deal, but the doctrine does not say that the person so using copyrighted material may not indirectly profit from it.

A teacher would get wages, a news agency would get viewership and they would earn dollars out of the exercise. Just because Google would earn more dollars, it does not seem logical to penalize it.

Oracle had previously asked the judge for infringer’s profits (a percentage for each product Google has sold), something that the judge threw out the window. This makes perfect sense since it would be a practically incalculable amount, given the percentage of code copied by Google.

Even then, we have to consider what exactly Google copied. It seems that they copied application programming interfaces (APIs), commonly referred to as source code. But this basically describes a pretty complex thing comprising software, instructions, best practices and techniques.

The developer community is comfortable with the idea of sharing APIs because it promotes the development of open source software (think Linux). It is also the foundation of cloud computing and responsible for the proliferation of the Internet. The thing that needs to be protected is the software itself.

Even leaving these technicalities aside, the jury found in the particular case that Sun Microsystems, which was the owner of the Java platform when Google used the code, gave Google reason to believe that certain parts of Java could be used without license. Therefore, Oracle’s claim lost its legs in the first phase of the trial.

A further argument in Google’s favor is the fact that there is a precedent to the case (although not in the U.S). Earlier this month, a European court ruled that APIs are not copyrightable. Therefore, a U.S. decision going against the principle would be a hindrance to software development in the country.

At any rate, the maximum Google could be called upon to pay would be around a million dollars in statutory damages, and given the arguments in Google’s favor, this too could be waived.

Google shares are currently ranked #3 by Zacks (Hold rating over the next 1-3 months), compared to Oracle’s #2 (Buy).

Please login to Zacks.com or register to post a comment.

New to Zacks?

Start Here

Zacks Investment Research

Close

Are you a new Zacks Member or a visitor to Zacks.com?

Top Zacks Features

Learn more

Start for as little as $4.50 per trade.

My Portfolio Tracker

Is it Time to Sell?

One of the most important steps you can take today is to set up your portfolio tracker on Zacks.com. Once you do, you'll be notified of major events affecting your stocks and/or funds with daily email alerts.

More Zacks Resources

Zacks Rank Home - Evaluate your stocks and use the Zacks Rank to eliminate the losers and keep the winners.

Mutual Fund Rank Home - Evaluate your funds with the Mutual Fund Rank for both your personal and retirement funds.

Stock/Mutual Fund Screening - Find better stocks and mutual funds. The ones most likely to beat the market and provide a positive return.

My Portfolio - Track your Portfolio and find out where your stocks/mutual funds stack up with the Zacks Rank.

Zacks #1 Rank Top Movers for Zacks #1 Rank Top Movers

Company Symbol Price %Chg
LAKE SHORE G LSG 0.77 +6.05%
QUESTCOR PHA QCOR 80.07 +2.47%
VIPSHOP HOLD VIPS 156.35 +1.82%
ENLINK MIDST ENLC 36.29 +1.60%
BNC BANCORP BNCN 17.33 +1.58%