This is our short term rating system that serves as a timeliness indicator for stocks over the next 1 to 3 months. How good is it? See rankings and related performance below.
|Zacks Rank||Definition||Annualized Return|
Zacks Rank Education - Learn more about the Zacks Rank
Zacks Rank Home - All Zacks Rank resources in one place
Zacks Premium - The only way to get access to the Zacks Rank
This page is temporarily not available. Please check later as it should be available shortly. If you have any questions, please email customer support at email@example.com or call 800-767-3771 ext. 9339.
Long-time strategic partners Hewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ - Analyst Report) and Oracle Corp. (ORCL - Analyst Report) could meet in court over a technological dispute. Though lawsuits encircling patent infringements and violation of contract terms are common in the tech sector, we think that the legal battle between these two giants will be a major issue.
In March 2011, Oracle decided to abandon the development of software needed to run itanium chip-based servers. The cessation was based on the assumption that Intel Corp. (INTC - Analyst Report) could stop the manufacture of itanium chips due to its feared obsolescence.
Oracle’s decision came as a major blow to H-P -- the main user of Itanium chips in servers needed to run large corporate databases and other demanding computing tasks. Without Oracle’s support, H-P will have a hard time marketing its host of server offerings.
The announcement miffed Intel, which denied any plan of dumping the itanium processor. Instead, the company informed that it has long-term plans for the itanium-architecture and is developing two itanium chips, namely Paulson and Kittson.
But Oracle stood firm. It maintained that itanium chips were expensive and could specifically be used in only a few applications. Therefore, Intel would scrap the itanium plan and focus on a range of widely accepted processors. It also hit back at Intel, claiming that the chip giant was being dishonest.
Despite repeated requests, Oracle stuck to its decision. Consequently, H-P sued Oracle for breach of contract in June 2011. H-P also alleged that Oracle was persuading customers to replace their itanium-based HP servers with Sun servers (Oracle acquired Sun Systems in January 2010).
The contract in question related to incessant software support from Oracle for H-P’s server systems. However, Oracle has denied the existence of any such contract.
Following Oracle’s announcement that it would withdraw software support for itanium, sales of Hewlett-Packard’s itanium-based Integrity and Superdome machines, which it describes as “business critical systems,” have been falling. Sales of Itanium hardware fell 23% to $421 million in Hewlett-Packard’s fiscal second quarter ended April 30. Oracle’s decision could thus prove to be an irrevocable loss to its server business.
To counter this loss, H-P is now demanding a court order to compel Oracle to restore its software support. H-P is also demanding damage charges of $500.0 million for the loss suffered in the interim period.
In case this ruling is not passed, H-P has plans to seek $4.0 billion from Oracle in damages.
What Lies Ahead?
We believe the prime consideration would be whether any material contract existed at all between the two. This could be a grey area given Oracle’s outright denial. On the other hand, H-P remains a leading player despite recent pressures. Therefore, it is unlikely to make a false claim.
Whatever the outcome, it is sure that both Oracle and H-P will be more aggressive in grabbing server market share. It isn’t just the companies that will be affected, the end-users will also be in deep water. Customers using H-P’s itanium chip-based server will have to search for better alternatives or restructure their IT systems.
The technology was jointly developed by Intel and H-P way back in 1994. But the high-performance, high-end chip was tailor-made for high-end servers. The product was slow to ramp up and was suppressed by the wide acceptance of Advanced Micro Devices Inc.’s (AMD - Analyst Report) 64-bit x-86 chip. Notably, in 2009, Unisys Corp. (UIS - Analyst Report), an Intel customer shifted from itanium to the x86-based Xeon server chip family.
Considering the above situation, we think that it might be difficult for H-P to carry on its itanium-based server business profitably. For the time being, we have to take a “wait and see” approach as H-P’s fate is now tied to the court’s decision.
Currently, H-P has a Zacks Rank #3, implying a short-term Hold recommendation. Oracle, despite the case that it recently lost to Google Inc. (GOOG - Analyst Report), has been assigned a Zacks Rank #2, implying a short-term Buy recommendation.
Please login to Zacks.com or register to post a comment.