They're hand-picked from the list of Zacks Rank #1 Strong Buys. Our experts predict that their prices will jump the soonest. Today, you can see them free.
Please login to Zacks.com or register to post a comment.
They're hand-picked from the list of Zacks Rank #1 Strong Buys. Our experts predict that their prices will jump the soonest.
Today, you can see them free.
| No Recent Quote currently available |
|
My Portfolio Tracker One of the most important steps you can take today is to set up your portfolio tracker on Zacks.com. Once you do, you'll be notified of major events affecting your stocks and/or funds with daily email alerts. Set yours up today. |
Zacks Rank Home - Evaluate your stocks and use the Zacks Rank to eliminate the losers and keep the winners.
Mutual Fund Rank Home - Evaluate your funds with the Mutual Fund Rank for both your personal and retirement funds.
Stock/Mutual Fund Screening - Find better stocks and mutual funds. The ones most likely to beat the market and provide a positive return.
My Portfolio - Track your Portfolio and find out where your stocks/mutual funds stack up with the Zacks Rank.
| Company Name | Symbol | %Change |
|---|---|---|
| SONIC FOUNDR | SOFO | 4.69% |
| SUMITOMO MIT | SMFG | 3.61% |
| VANTIV INC | VNTV | 3.21% |
| NIPPON TELEG | NTT | 3.03% |
| TOKIO MARINE | TKOMY | 2.99% |
They're hand-picked from the list of Zacks Rank #1 Strong Buys. Our experts predict that their prices will jump the soonest. Today, you can see them free.
Please login to Zacks.com or register to post a comment.
Resources
Client Support
Zacks Research is Reported On:
Zacks Investment Research
is an A+ Rated BBB
Accredited Business.
Copyright 2013 Zacks Investment Research
At the center of everything we do is a strong commitment to independent research and sharing its profitable discoveries with investors. This dedication to giving investors a trading advantage led to the creation of our proven Zacks Rank stock-rating system. Since 1986 it has nearly tripled the S&P 500 with an average gain of +26% per year. These returns cover a period from 1986-2011 and were examined and attested by Baker Tilly, an independent accounting firm.
Visit performance for information about the performance numbers displayed above.
NYSE and AMEX data is at least 20 minutes delayed. NASDAQ data is at least 15 minutes delayed.
This page is temporarily not available. Please check later as it should be available shortly. If you have any questions, please email customer support at support@zacks.com or call 800-767-3771 ext. 9339.
The big issue the latest FOMC members debated in today’s minutes was a move to “specific threshold values” for unemployment and inflation.
Specific targets for these two variables would provide “forward guidance regarding the timing of the initial increase in the Fed Funds rate”. Currently, the Fed relies solely on a mid-2015 calendar date to communicate when the Fed Funds rate is to move off its zero level.
This new approach would be some version of a plan offered by Chicago Fed President Charles Evans. He wants the Fed to tell financial markets that it will keep Fed Fund rates low -- until the unemployment rate falls below 7%, and as long as inflation remains below 3%.
FOMC minutes showed three issues needed to be resolved, before officials would use "economic thresholds."
The three issues:
(1) Whether to specify such thresholds in terms of realized or projected values of inflation and the unemployment rate. And, in either case, what values for those thresholds would best balance the Committee’s objectives of promoting maximum employment and price stability?
(2) Whether to supplement thresholds expressed in terms of the unemployment rate and inflation with additional indicators of economic and financial conditions that might signal a need either to raise the federal funds rate before a threshold is crossed, or to delay until well afterward.
(3) Whether the statement should also provide forward guidance about the likely path of the federal funds rate after the initial increase. It was noted that such guidance could have significant effects on financial conditions and the economy.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Chairman Bernanke asked the staff present to provide additional background material, taking into account the range of participants’ views.
What do you think?
Would using “specific threshold values”, i.e. an unemployment below 7% and inflation below 3%, better communicate an upward change in the Fed Funds rate from zero?
Or would adding these two variables just add confusion?
Get the full ETF report on SPY - FREE
Get the full ETF report on QQQ - FREE
Get the full ETF report on DIA - FREE
Get the full ETF report on GLD - FREE