This is our short term rating system that serves as a timeliness indicator for stocks over the next 1 to 3 months. How good is it? See rankings and related performance below.
|Zacks Rank||Definition||Annualized Return|
Zacks Rank Education - Learn more about the Zacks Rank
Zacks Rank Home - All Zacks Rank resources in one place
Zacks Premium - The only way to get access to the Zacks Rank
This page is temporarily not available. Please check later as it should be available shortly. If you have any questions, please email customer support at firstname.lastname@example.org or call 800-767-3771 ext. 9339.
According to Bloomberg, the U.S. Court of Appeals in Manhattan turned down the dismissal of a lawsuit by a lower court ruling on Friday. The lawsuit was filed by the New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund against The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (RBS), Deutsche Bank AG (DB - Snapshot Report), Wells Fargo & Company (WFC - Analyst Report) and NovaStar Mortgage Inc.
The lodged complaint claims that these banks misrepresented documents as an underwriter in the sale of over $1.3 billion in mortgage-backed securities in 2007. The fund alleged that the banks deceptively sold the mortgage-linked securities that gradually failed and also misrepresented the value of instrument by providing materially misleading statements.
Moreover, the New Jersey pension fund alleges that the banks failed to expose NovaStar’s ignorance in complying with its own underwriting standards and the company’s use of overstated appraisals. The banks have been blamed for overlooking these issues while buying loans from NovaStar and selling them as securities to investors. Eventually, the market showed a downtrend, resulting in huge losses for common investors.
Previously, the pension fund sued a larger group of securities in six offerings worth $7.7 billion. However, in 2011, U.S. District Judge, Deborah Batts dismissed the complaint, claiming that the fund invested in just one offering and therefore a lawsuit cannot be filed for the other five offerings. Moreover, the judge highlighted the absence of supporting documents related to the case.
After the dismissal of the case, the pension fund again filed the lawsuit in 2011 over 2007 securities. Currently, the appeals court approved the allegations and regarded them as adequate for proceeding with the case. Moreover, the lower court has been intimated to analyze whether other offerings can be sued by the fund.
However, spokesmen from the banks refrained from commenting on the issue.
The continuously increasing number of lawsuits is apprehended to dent the reputation of the banks and financials. However, investors who lost their hard-earned money in such investments should get some reprieve.
Among other banks, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM - Analyst Report) and Citigroup have also been legally accused of distorting documents related to mortgage-backed securities and other losses in 2011.
Please login to Zacks.com or register to post a comment.