This page is temporarily not available. Please check later as it should be available shortly. If you have any questions, please email customer support at email@example.com or call 800-767-3771 ext. 9339.
According to a new survey from market research and global information company The NPD Group, the effectiveness of deals in driving traffic to restaurants has declined considerably. NPD’s foodservice market research says that compared to a year earlier, restaurants visits using a “meal deal” had declined by 3% in 2012.
Some examples of deals which are currently on offer include the $1 menu from McDonald's Corp. (MCD - Analyst Report) and the $10 dinner box from Pizza Hut, which is part of Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM - Analyst Report). Also, two-medium, two-topping pizzas are being offered by Domino's Pizza, Inc. (DPZ - Analyst Report) for $5.99 each. One example from sit-down casual dining is Red Lobster, owned by Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI - Analyst Report), which offers a $7.99 lunch special.
Traditionally the most frequently used types of restaurant deals -- combo meals and value menu item offers -- were primarily responsible for the decline in traffic. However, visits based on coupons, "buy one, get one free" and discounted prices have increased.
These figures were captured by NPD’s CREST from more than 4,000,000 consumer restaurant visits every year. That said, this data in no way undermines the importance of deals in the restaurant business. Deals were the force driving visits during the peak of the recession when restaurant traffic had otherwise declined. Non-deal traffic had fallen by 1% while deal traffic gained 5% in 2008.
In comparison, deal traffic had increased by 3% in 2009 whereas non-deal traffic had declined by 4%. Deal traffic was nearly flat in 2010, non-deal traffic had declined by 1%. Both deal and non-deal traffic were unchanged in 2011.
By 2012, the picture had changed completely. Non-deal traffic had gone up by 2% whereas restaurant visits on deals had fallen by 3%. This is particularly significant because the trend had changed even though deal traffic made up 23% of all traffic. Of course, by this time many of the deals that were offered first during the recession had been in place for quite a few years.
On the other hand, deal checks have gone up since the recession. In 2012, the average deal meal could be purchased at $5.97 compared to $7.04 for non-deal meals. Therefore, the price differential between deal and non-deal meals has declined sharply, reducing their draw significantly.
But the major issue is that of the comparative value of the deal itself, even if the price is significantly lower. NPD is of the view that if a deal remains in place for too long then customers believe that the deal price is the regular price of those items. For instance, “two for $20” lunch deals have been offered at casual dining restaurants for quite some time now. This is applicable in every case, particularly for combo meals and value menu items as shown by the study.
Harry Balzar, chief industry analyst at NPD, is of the view that there is a need to get creative and make sweeping changes to the way these offers are conceived. Restaurants, retailers and food service departments should all alter these deals to attract higher traffic.
One of the major issues to be highlighted by the report is the behavior of younger customers. As far as this group is concerned, deal visits have clearly declined, almost drastically in the case of deals related to combo meals and value menus. This trend has been particularly strong over the last few years.
NPD’s restaurant industry analyst believes that deals must reflect the tastes and needs of this younger segment. Relying on existing value items and bundled meals may no longer be a choice. This is significant across customer segments given the prevailing customer sentiment and economization. Clearly, deals have to undergo radical retooling to drive traffic for the industry in the future.