We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, revised Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
It was bound to happen. Stocks that soar high as the sky will end up bringing out the naysayers and of course the shorts. Their reports are filled with promises of a demise. They are filled with charts about how we have seen this before when people overpaid for tulips or some other type of flower. At the end of the day, their reports almost always are focused on one main thing, the valuation of the target.
The valuation argument is one that investors actual already had when they chose to buy the stock, or not buy the stock or short the stock. When an investor chooses to buy the stock they do so with the expectation that the company will be worth in the future. How much more it will be worth and when is up to the individual investor. When the investor chooses to not buy the stock (and not short it) as most investors do, they are making the statement that they don't believe in the prospects for the stock or would rather a better price. Finally, those that short the stock believe that prospects are not to be believed and that investors are paying too much for what is to be expected down the road
Shorts are an important part of the market. They give us a reality check when euphoria takes over and they often do a little more homework than most as they accept unlimited upside risk when taking a short position against a stock.
Citron Research came out with a short call on Nvida(NVDA - Free Report) as they see a 20% downside to the current price. Andrew Left noted that he has been a fan of the company but the last few days have seen the market cap increase by the amount of a competitor (AMD - Free Report) . The short seller says that the company is not a fraud or a scam but the stock simply got ahead of itself.
One of the reasons the stock became overvalued is that Citi put out an "irresponsibly bullish" target price of $180 on the stock. The stock was trading below $150 the day before the target price increase from Citi and it rallied as high as $168.50 today. Left noted that volumes were also extremely high suggesting that day traders and investors were using the stock as a "casino stock" and asked does the stock need to go up every day to be a great company.
While the short-term impact is hurting the stock, the reality is that the stock might have gotten ahead of itself. Does this mean that the shorts and their target of $130 is next for the stock? I sincerely doubt it, but a pause for the cause will be a great thing. The thing that got me was that on a recent TV appearance, Left suggested that the stock price for Intel told him how the business was performing and that is simply not correct. As noted on the segment, the stock price and the performance of the company are not linked at the hip.
Prices tend to move based on supply and demand, but emotions play a role as does overall sentiment in a particular stock. At the end of the day, a professional investor focuses on the earnings and future cash flows of a company more than the movement of the stock on a minute to minute basis. Right now NVDA is a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) as analysts have not adjusted estimates (up or down) over the last seven days. You can see the movement in earnings estimates on the detailed estimates page at this link (https://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/NVDA/detailed-estimates).
My take is that NVDA has a long road ahead and AI is only just getting started. Investors that have a long term focus should consider adding NVDA to their portfolios. In a recent podcast I discussed the prospects for NVDA here (https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/263279/game-changing-stocks-you-must-own).
You can add independent research firm Hedgeye to the list of market participants that believe that Tesla (TSLA - Free Report) is a short. It was reported earlier today that the firm known for making snap calls and taking quick gains called the stock their best short idea. Sellers quickly overwhelmed buyers with shares after the call was made public but it appears to have found a bottom.
David Einhorn, a noted short seller, has been short the stock for some time but was feeling the pain again today as the stock reached another new 52 week high of $376.87 before word of the Hedgeye call slammed the stock. Einhorn and Hedgeye are not alone in saying that the shares of the automaker are overvalued. Just as the analyst at Barclays who has been unwaveringly wrong on the stock and even noted that the recent earnings from TSLA (which were disappointing by most measures) would still be a catalyst for another leg higher in price.
My view on TSLA, despite it being a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) is that shares will reach $450 and probably more. Let's go back in time, when the stock was far below the recent highs. April 12 saw the stock trade in a range from $296-$308 -- and it closed that day at $296.84, but that was the day that I published why I believed that it was headed to $450 (https://www.zacks.com/commentary/110024/ride-tesla-to-450-and-beyond) in my article "Ride Tesla to $450 and Beyond."
Following a poor quarter, analysts dialed back some estimates and that caused the Zacks Rank for this stock to slide to a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell). With fresh auto sales numbers coming out around the start of July, I would not want to be short the stock. Keep in mind that the Model 3, which is primary demand driver for the stock is also set to begin production in that month and those two factors alone should send the stock higher.
Finally, there was a short piece on a Radiant Logistics (RLGT - Free Report) the other day penned by a group that also saw huge problems with Burlington Stores and Wix. I am not going to detail this one out much more to say that the prior missives on BURL and WIX were disastrous to investors if you followed their lead, so why is anything going to be different this time around with RLGT? These "short and distort" type publications often scare investors out a perfectly good stock like RLGT. At the same time, they offer wonderful buying opportunities for informed investors who realize the surge that all the transportation and transportation dependent stocks have been seeing of late.
Radiant Logistics is a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) and a steal at current prices of just over $5. The company sports a growth style score of "B" and is among my favorites.
Image: Bigstock
Shorts Attack NVDA, TSLA and RLGT
It was bound to happen. Stocks that soar high as the sky will end up bringing out the naysayers and of course the shorts. Their reports are filled with promises of a demise. They are filled with charts about how we have seen this before when people overpaid for tulips or some other type of flower. At the end of the day, their reports almost always are focused on one main thing, the valuation of the target.
The valuation argument is one that investors actual already had when they chose to buy the stock, or not buy the stock or short the stock. When an investor chooses to buy the stock they do so with the expectation that the company will be worth in the future. How much more it will be worth and when is up to the individual investor. When the investor chooses to not buy the stock (and not short it) as most investors do, they are making the statement that they don't believe in the prospects for the stock or would rather a better price. Finally, those that short the stock believe that prospects are not to be believed and that investors are paying too much for what is to be expected down the road
Shorts are an important part of the market. They give us a reality check when euphoria takes over and they often do a little more homework than most as they accept unlimited upside risk when taking a short position against a stock.
Follow Brian Bolan on Twitter: @BBolan1
Recent Short Call
Citron Research came out with a short call on Nvida (NVDA - Free Report) as they see a 20% downside to the current price. Andrew Left noted that he has been a fan of the company but the last few days have seen the market cap increase by the amount of a competitor (AMD - Free Report) . The short seller says that the company is not a fraud or a scam but the stock simply got ahead of itself.
One of the reasons the stock became overvalued is that Citi put out an "irresponsibly bullish" target price of $180 on the stock. The stock was trading below $150 the day before the target price increase from Citi and it rallied as high as $168.50 today. Left noted that volumes were also extremely high suggesting that day traders and investors were using the stock as a "casino stock" and asked does the stock need to go up every day to be a great company.
While the short-term impact is hurting the stock, the reality is that the stock might have gotten ahead of itself. Does this mean that the shorts and their target of $130 is next for the stock? I sincerely doubt it, but a pause for the cause will be a great thing. The thing that got me was that on a recent TV appearance, Left suggested that the stock price for Intel told him how the business was performing and that is simply not correct. As noted on the segment, the stock price and the performance of the company are not linked at the hip.
Prices tend to move based on supply and demand, but emotions play a role as does overall sentiment in a particular stock. At the end of the day, a professional investor focuses on the earnings and future cash flows of a company more than the movement of the stock on a minute to minute basis. Right now NVDA is a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) as analysts have not adjusted estimates (up or down) over the last seven days. You can see the movement in earnings estimates on the detailed estimates page at this link (https://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/NVDA/detailed-estimates).
My take is that NVDA has a long road ahead and AI is only just getting started. Investors that have a long term focus should consider adding NVDA to their portfolios. In a recent podcast I discussed the prospects for NVDA here (https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/263279/game-changing-stocks-you-must-own).
Follow Brian Bolan on Twitter: @BBolan1
NVIDIA Corporation Price and Consensus
NVIDIA Corporation Price and Consensus | NVIDIA Corporation Quote
Tesla Shares Jolted
You can add independent research firm Hedgeye to the list of market participants that believe that Tesla (TSLA - Free Report) is a short. It was reported earlier today that the firm known for making snap calls and taking quick gains called the stock their best short idea. Sellers quickly overwhelmed buyers with shares after the call was made public but it appears to have found a bottom.
David Einhorn, a noted short seller, has been short the stock for some time but was feeling the pain again today as the stock reached another new 52 week high of $376.87 before word of the Hedgeye call slammed the stock. Einhorn and Hedgeye are not alone in saying that the shares of the automaker are overvalued. Just as the analyst at Barclays who has been unwaveringly wrong on the stock and even noted that the recent earnings from TSLA (which were disappointing by most measures) would still be a catalyst for another leg higher in price.
My view on TSLA, despite it being a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) is that shares will reach $450 and probably more. Let's go back in time, when the stock was far below the recent highs. April 12 saw the stock trade in a range from $296-$308 -- and it closed that day at $296.84, but that was the day that I published why I believed that it was headed to $450 (https://www.zacks.com/commentary/110024/ride-tesla-to-450-and-beyond) in my article "Ride Tesla to $450 and Beyond."
Following a poor quarter, analysts dialed back some estimates and that caused the Zacks Rank for this stock to slide to a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell). With fresh auto sales numbers coming out around the start of July, I would not want to be short the stock. Keep in mind that the Model 3, which is primary demand driver for the stock is also set to begin production in that month and those two factors alone should send the stock higher.
Follow Brian Bolan on Twitter: @BBolan1
Tesla Inc. Price and Consensus
Tesla Inc. Price and Consensus | Tesla Inc. Quote
Shorts Of All Sizes
Finally, there was a short piece on a Radiant Logistics (RLGT - Free Report) the other day penned by a group that also saw huge problems with Burlington Stores and Wix. I am not going to detail this one out much more to say that the prior missives on BURL and WIX were disastrous to investors if you followed their lead, so why is anything going to be different this time around with RLGT? These "short and distort" type publications often scare investors out a perfectly good stock like RLGT. At the same time, they offer wonderful buying opportunities for informed investors who realize the surge that all the transportation and transportation dependent stocks have been seeing of late.
Radiant Logistics is a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) and a steal at current prices of just over $5. The company sports a growth style score of "B" and is among my favorites.
Radiant Logistics, Inc. Price and Consensus
Radiant Logistics, Inc. Price and Consensus | Radiant Logistics, Inc. Quote