We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, revised Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Forget Active, Passive EM Bond ETF Hits $10 Billion in Assets
Read MoreHide Full Article
Gone are the days when emerging bond ETFs required the fund manager’s active technique. These markets were believed to highly volatile and crammed with political upheavals. But the latest trading pattern and investors’ outlook say a different story.
An article published on Seeking Alpha revealed that iShares JPMorgan USD Emerging Market Bond ETF (EMB - Free Report) beat its active counterparts by an average 74 basis points over the last five years, according to Morningstar.
Bloomberg compares the success of EMB with “the largest actively managed fund in the category, the far more expensive Pictet-Global Emerging Debt fund.” Notably, the Pictet fund is a Societe D’investissement A Capital Variable, or SICAV, which is an open-ended investment product that’s prevalent in Western Europe and similar to a mutual fund.
Let’s take a look what led EMB to outperform all.
Low Expense ratio
BlackRock charges 40 basis points (net) for EMB compared with 143 basis points for Pictet’s active fund. Bloomberg went on to point out that the average fee for U.S. mutual funds that track emerging markets is about 90 bps, or double BlackRock’s pricing, as per data from the Investment Company Institute and Lipper.
In any case, BlackRock has been pretty proactive lately in slashing expense ratios. It reduced fees for core ETFs, six multifactor ETFs and a short-term bond ETF in recent times (read: BlackRock Slashes Fees, ETF Price War Intensifies).
On the other hand, active funds are always known for high costs. These involve research expenses associated with the manager’s due diligence and additional cost in the form of a wide bid/ask spread beyond the expense ratio.
Wind is in Favor of Emerging Market Bonds
EM economies are a lot more protected from Fed tightening shocks this time than they were in 2013, which is remembered for the taper-tantrum. As a result, strong fundamentals have lately called for EM investing. And since fixed-income securities are less risky than equities and offer solid yield, investors are all the more keen on these products (read: Dollar Denominated EM Bond ETFs: A Good Play for 2017?).
Since volatility in the EM space has ebbed lately, currency issues have somewhat stabilized, and fundamentals have strengthened, the need for active investing (paying a high cost) is likely to diminish. Moreover, the clip of credit rating downgrades in EMs slowed (as per the source) in the second half of 2016, though worries remain.
Notably, emerging market companies and governments sold $178.5 billion of dollar-denominated debt in Q1, marking the highest quarterly amount ever. EMB has gathered about $2.14 billion in assets so far this year (as of April 17, 2017). EMB, which gives exposure to U.S. dollar-denominated government bonds issued by emerging market countries, yields about 4.70% annually.
Yields Are U.S. Treasury-Beating
The Fed is on the policy tightening mode, thanks to which U.S. Treasury bond yield should rise ahead. But investors should note that EM bond ETFs’ yields are generally pretty higher than U.S. Treasury yields in a rising rate environment. Going beyond the U.S., several developed economies are practicing an ultra-low monetary policy, which pushed investors to flock to EM debt ETFs (read: ETF Strategies for a Rising Rate Environment).
ETFs in Focus
Given below are some other EM bond ETFs that could be on investors’ radar in the coming days thanks to their low cost and high yields (see all Emerging Market Bond ETFs here).
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets Aggregate Bond ETF
Net expense ratio – 0.49%; Yield – 4.35%
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB - Free Report)
Image: Bigstock
Forget Active, Passive EM Bond ETF Hits $10 Billion in Assets
Gone are the days when emerging bond ETFs required the fund manager’s active technique. These markets were believed to highly volatile and crammed with political upheavals. But the latest trading pattern and investors’ outlook say a different story.
An article published on Seeking Alpha revealed that iShares JPMorgan USD Emerging Market Bond ETF (EMB - Free Report) beat its active counterparts by an average 74 basis points over the last five years, according to Morningstar.
As a result, investors gathered happily around the fund and allowed EMB – the largest emerging market debt fund – to double its asset base to over $10 billion in the last one year (read: What Bond ETF Inflows are Saying About Fixed Income Trade).
Bloomberg compares the success of EMB with “the largest actively managed fund in the category, the far more expensive Pictet-Global Emerging Debt fund.” Notably, the Pictet fund is a Societe D’investissement A Capital Variable, or SICAV, which is an open-ended investment product that’s prevalent in Western Europe and similar to a mutual fund.
Let’s take a look what led EMB to outperform all.
Low Expense ratio
BlackRock charges 40 basis points (net) for EMB compared with 143 basis points for Pictet’s active fund. Bloomberg went on to point out that the average fee for U.S. mutual funds that track emerging markets is about 90 bps, or double BlackRock’s pricing, as per data from the Investment Company Institute and Lipper.
In any case, BlackRock has been pretty proactive lately in slashing expense ratios. It reduced fees for core ETFs, six multifactor ETFs and a short-term bond ETF in recent times (read: BlackRock Slashes Fees, ETF Price War Intensifies).
On the other hand, active funds are always known for high costs. These involve research expenses associated with the manager’s due diligence and additional cost in the form of a wide bid/ask spread beyond the expense ratio.
Wind is in Favor of Emerging Market Bonds
EM economies are a lot more protected from Fed tightening shocks this time than they were in 2013, which is remembered for the taper-tantrum. As a result, strong fundamentals have lately called for EM investing. And since fixed-income securities are less risky than equities and offer solid yield, investors are all the more keen on these products (read: Dollar Denominated EM Bond ETFs: A Good Play for 2017?).
Since volatility in the EM space has ebbed lately, currency issues have somewhat stabilized, and fundamentals have strengthened, the need for active investing (paying a high cost) is likely to diminish. Moreover, the clip of credit rating downgrades in EMs slowed (as per the source) in the second half of 2016, though worries remain.
Notably, emerging market companies and governments sold $178.5 billion of dollar-denominated debt in Q1, marking the highest quarterly amount ever. EMB has gathered about $2.14 billion in assets so far this year (as of April 17, 2017). EMB, which gives exposure to U.S. dollar-denominated government bonds issued by emerging market countries, yields about 4.70% annually.
Yields Are U.S. Treasury-Beating
The Fed is on the policy tightening mode, thanks to which U.S. Treasury bond yield should rise ahead. But investors should note that EM bond ETFs’ yields are generally pretty higher than U.S. Treasury yields in a rising rate environment. Going beyond the U.S., several developed economies are practicing an ultra-low monetary policy, which pushed investors to flock to EM debt ETFs (read: ETF Strategies for a Rising Rate Environment).
ETFs in Focus
Given below are some other EM bond ETFs that could be on investors’ radar in the coming days thanks to their low cost and high yields (see all Emerging Market Bond ETFs here).
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets Aggregate Bond ETF
Net expense ratio – 0.49%; Yield – 4.35%
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB - Free Report)
Net expense ratio – 0.32%; Yield – 5.02%
PowerShares Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt Portfolio ETF (PCY - Free Report)
Net expense ratio – 0.50%; Yield – 5.47%
Want key ETF info delivered straight to your inbox?
Zacks’ free Fund Newsletter will brief you on top news and analysis, as well as top-performing ETFs, each week. Get it free >>