We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, revised Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
BofA (BAC) Under CFPB Investigation for Unauthorized Accounts
Read MoreHide Full Article
Bank of America Corporation (BAC - Free Report) is under investigation by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) to find out if it opened unauthorized customer accounts to meet sales goals back in 2014.
In March 2019, the CFPB demanded that BofA provide documents concerning “unlawful acts or practices in connection with unauthorized consumer bank, credit card, and other accounts.”
The CFPB’s probe came to light recently when on Tuesday the regulatory body posted the documents that it sought from the bank. The documents showed legal disputes between the CFPB and BofA over the past six months.
Notably, after Wells Fargo & Company’s (WFC - Free Report) fake account scandal came to light, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) already investigated more than 40 banks, including BofA, for similar wrongdoing.
Hence, in a March petition, BofA requested that the CFPB dismisses its demand. This is because the bank felt that the OCC’s investigation was suitable, but now the probe that the CFPB is conducting is “unnecessary, redundant and unduly burdensome.”
In fact, BofA said that the evidence that it provided earlier to the agency were proof that the bank did not have any systemic sales misconduct issues. It was established that there were certain instances of “potentially unauthorized credit card accounts” but the number was identified as “vanishingly small.”
Hence, in its petition to dismiss CFPB’s probe, BofA argued that the CFPB should modify its investigation and keep certain information confidential.
BofA mentioned that before March 2017, customers that opened accounts with the bank were not required to provide signatures to serve as evidence of their intent. Instead, their authorization was captured via a digital interface.
While the bank has changed this practice, it said that no evidence suggests that the practice it followed in the pre-2017 period promoted the opening of customer accounts without their authorization.
Andy Aldridge, a spokesman for BofA stated, “In previous reviews, we have worked with regulators to confirm we have the right processes and controls in place to govern our sales practices, and that we have not experienced any systemic issues. We will continue to cooperate with the CFPB, and look forward to wrapping up this investigation and demonstrating what prior reviews confirmed.”
In July 2019, Kathleen Kraninger, the CFPB’s director denied BofA’s request to modify its investigation. However, recently, even though in part, she granted its request for keeping the information confidential.
Conclusion
Many finance companies across the globe have been facing increasing scrutiny for their business practices. Many of these firms have paid billions of dollars as fines and compensation to settle lawsuits and probes.
Recently, Deutsche Bank AG (DB - Free Report) agreed to pay $15 million in penalty to settle allegations that it exploited its market presence by overcharging clients for unsecured bonds issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac between 2009 and 2016.
In June 2019, State Street Corporation (STT - Free Report) agreed to pay $94.3 million for consistently overcharging mutual fund customers and other clients through concealed markups on back-office expenses for around 17 years.
Our Take
While improved digital offerings, decent loan growth and efforts to control costs are likely to continue to support BofA’s profitability; litigation issues related to its business misconducts in the pre-crisis period will likely lead to higher legal expenses.
Shares of BofA have gained 5.9% over the past six months, underperforming 7.8% growth recorded by the industry.
Experts extracted 7 stocks from the list of 220 Zacks Rank #1 Strong Buys that has beaten the market more than 2X over with a stunning average gain of +24.6% per year.
These 7 were selected because of their superior potential for immediate breakout.
Image: Bigstock
BofA (BAC) Under CFPB Investigation for Unauthorized Accounts
Bank of America Corporation (BAC - Free Report) is under investigation by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) to find out if it opened unauthorized customer accounts to meet sales goals back in 2014.
In March 2019, the CFPB demanded that BofA provide documents concerning “unlawful acts or practices in connection with unauthorized consumer bank, credit card, and other accounts.”
The CFPB’s probe came to light recently when on Tuesday the regulatory body posted the documents that it sought from the bank. The documents showed legal disputes between the CFPB and BofA over the past six months.
Notably, after Wells Fargo & Company’s (WFC - Free Report) fake account scandal came to light, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) already investigated more than 40 banks, including BofA, for similar wrongdoing.
Hence, in a March petition, BofA requested that the CFPB dismisses its demand. This is because the bank felt that the OCC’s investigation was suitable, but now the probe that the CFPB is conducting is “unnecessary, redundant and unduly burdensome.”
In fact, BofA said that the evidence that it provided earlier to the agency were proof that the bank did not have any systemic sales misconduct issues. It was established that there were certain instances of “potentially unauthorized credit card accounts” but the number was identified as “vanishingly small.”
Hence, in its petition to dismiss CFPB’s probe, BofA argued that the CFPB should modify its investigation and keep certain information confidential.
BofA mentioned that before March 2017, customers that opened accounts with the bank were not required to provide signatures to serve as evidence of their intent. Instead, their authorization was captured via a digital interface.
While the bank has changed this practice, it said that no evidence suggests that the practice it followed in the pre-2017 period promoted the opening of customer accounts without their authorization.
Andy Aldridge, a spokesman for BofA stated, “In previous reviews, we have worked with regulators to confirm we have the right processes and controls in place to govern our sales practices, and that we have not experienced any systemic issues. We will continue to cooperate with the CFPB, and look forward to wrapping up this investigation and demonstrating what prior reviews confirmed.”
In July 2019, Kathleen Kraninger, the CFPB’s director denied BofA’s request to modify its investigation. However, recently, even though in part, she granted its request for keeping the information confidential.
Conclusion
Many finance companies across the globe have been facing increasing scrutiny for their business practices. Many of these firms have paid billions of dollars as fines and compensation to settle lawsuits and probes.
Recently, Deutsche Bank AG (DB - Free Report) agreed to pay $15 million in penalty to settle allegations that it exploited its market presence by overcharging clients for unsecured bonds issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac between 2009 and 2016.
In June 2019, State Street Corporation (STT - Free Report) agreed to pay $94.3 million for consistently overcharging mutual fund customers and other clients through concealed markups on back-office expenses for around 17 years.
Our Take
While improved digital offerings, decent loan growth and efforts to control costs are likely to continue to support BofA’s profitability; litigation issues related to its business misconducts in the pre-crisis period will likely lead to higher legal expenses.
Shares of BofA have gained 5.9% over the past six months, underperforming 7.8% growth recorded by the industry.
Currently, the stock carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Just Released: Zacks’ 7 Best Stocks for Today
Experts extracted 7 stocks from the list of 220 Zacks Rank #1 Strong Buys that has beaten the market more than 2X over with a stunning average gain of +24.6% per year.
These 7 were selected because of their superior potential for immediate breakout.
See these time-sensitive tickers now >>