We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, revised Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Facebook has agreed to pay $40 million to settle a case with advertisers that it maintains is “without merit.”
Advertisers claim that Facebook moderated viewing metrics that made them spend more on the platform. But as it turns out, the problem related to the way viewing metrics were recorded in the first place, and that was actually known to everyone. Facebook has added that it related to videos advertisers were providing free, on which Facebook didn’t directly earn anything.
Facebook’s system recorded a view only when it was longer than 3 seconds. While this left out some views, it appeared that average viewing times were longer than they actually were. Advertisers claimed that this led then to misread the popularity of their content, which made them increase their spending on the platform. And naturally, when they increased spending, Facebook benefited.
Facebook says that although it was not at fault, settling was a better way to finally put this thing behind it (the case related to what happened between 2015 and 2016, Facebook announced that this thing was happening in 2016 and was sued in October of that year). The company maintains that it was not aware of the happening a year before its public announcement, as claimed by some based on the fact that the watch time increased by up to 900% in some cases.
Whether at fault or not, the matter increased awareness about the need for independent auditing of ad metrics and led Facebook and other industry players like Alphabet (GOOGL - Free Report) -owned YouTube and Twitter , to get their metrics audited by the Media Rating Council.
Would you like to see the updated picks from our best market-beating strategies? From 2017 through 2018, while the S&P 500 gained +15.8%, five of our screens returned +38.0%, +61.3%, +61.6%, +68.1% and +98.3%.
This outperformance has not just been a recent phenomenon. From 2000 – 2018, while the S&P averaged +4.8% per year, our top strategies averaged up to +56.2% per year.
Image: Bigstock
Facebook Settles with Advertisers
Facebook has agreed to pay $40 million to settle a case with advertisers that it maintains is “without merit.”
Advertisers claim that Facebook moderated viewing metrics that made them spend more on the platform. But as it turns out, the problem related to the way viewing metrics were recorded in the first place, and that was actually known to everyone. Facebook has added that it related to videos advertisers were providing free, on which Facebook didn’t directly earn anything.
Facebook’s system recorded a view only when it was longer than 3 seconds. While this left out some views, it appeared that average viewing times were longer than they actually were. Advertisers claimed that this led then to misread the popularity of their content, which made them increase their spending on the platform. And naturally, when they increased spending, Facebook benefited.
Facebook says that although it was not at fault, settling was a better way to finally put this thing behind it (the case related to what happened between 2015 and 2016, Facebook announced that this thing was happening in 2016 and was sued in October of that year). The company maintains that it was not aware of the happening a year before its public announcement, as claimed by some based on the fact that the watch time increased by up to 900% in some cases.
Whether at fault or not, the matter increased awareness about the need for independent auditing of ad metrics and led Facebook and other industry players like Alphabet (GOOGL - Free Report) -owned YouTube and Twitter , to get their metrics audited by the Media Rating Council.
Recommendation
Facebook shares carry a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). Buy-ranked stocks worth investing in instead are Sohu (SOHU - Free Report) , Akamai Technologies (AKAM - Free Report) and Dropbox (DBX - Free Report) . Also see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Today's Best Stocks from Zacks
Would you like to see the updated picks from our best market-beating strategies? From 2017 through 2018, while the S&P 500 gained +15.8%, five of our screens returned +38.0%, +61.3%, +61.6%, +68.1% and +98.3%.
This outperformance has not just been a recent phenomenon. From 2000 – 2018, while the S&P averaged +4.8% per year, our top strategies averaged up to +56.2% per year.
See their latest picks free >>