We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, revised Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
UBS Group (UBS) Fined by MAS Over Bond Price Malpractice
Read MoreHide Full Article
UBS Group AG (UBS - Free Report) has been fined S$11.2 million ($8 million) by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (“MAS”) for deceiving clients over prices of bonds and other structured products.
In 2016, UBS Group had reported misconduct by its client advisors, particularly in Singapore and Hong Kong, to the MAS. The MAS conducted investigations post that.
The MAS recently said that the investigation revealed that the Swiss banks’ advisers had deceived clients or engaged in acts that were likely to deceive them.
The MAS stated in a news release yesterday that the misconduct relates to “the spreads and/or interbank prices for transactions in over-the-counter (OTC) bonds and structured products.”
It added, “When UBS executed OTC transactions requested by its clients, it did so with interbank counterparties and its practice was to charge a spread over the interbank price that it obtained from the counterparty.”
The investigation showed that the client advisers of UBS Group in Singapore either did not stick to the spread or interbank price, which was agreed by the clients, or overcharged them in excess of the fees sent out in the fee disclosure documents.
The MAS added, “The client advisers’ actions were possible because OTC product prices were not readily accessible to clients for them to verify against the transacted prices advised by UBS. In addition, internal system weaknesses enabled the client advisers to increase the spread post-trade in the order management system.”
Ong Chong Tee, the deputy managing director, financial supervision at MAS, said, “The conduct of UBS through its representatives is unacceptable and has no place in the financial services industry where trust and integrity are paramount.”
Nevertheless, the MAS stated that UBS Group fully cooperated with the investigation. Also, the bank has paid the fine and has taken measures to compensate all clients affected by the malpractice, which took place between 2008 and 2017.
UBS Group stated, “The behavior of the individuals involved is unacceptable and in strong contrast to the behavioral principles of our firm.”
As a Swiss systemically relevant bank, UBS Group is subject to heightened regulatory supervision. Because of rise in regulatory costs, its bottom line is expected to remain under pressure.
Notably, UBS Group is also required to pay about HK$400 million to the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”) for having overcharged up to 5,000 clients between 2008 and 2015.
Shares of the bank have lost 1.8% so far this year against 3.9% growth of the industry it belongs to.
Increased scrutiny on global banks for their business practices has caused many of these firms to pay billions of dollars as fines and compensation to settle lawsuits and probes. Many investors lost their hard-earned money due to such business malpractices.
Last month, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) said that two advisory units of Bank of Montreal (BMO - Free Report) agreed to pay a penalty of nearly $38 million for overcharging clients.
Deutsche Bank AG (DB - Free Report) recently agreed to pay $15 million in penalty to settle allegations that it exploited its market presence by overcharging clients for unsecured bonds issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac between 2009 and 2016.
In June 2019, State Street Corporation (STT - Free Report) agreed to pay $94.3 million for consistently overcharging mutual fund customers and other clients through concealed markups on back-office expenses for around 17 years.
Free: Zacks’ Single Best Stock Set to Double
Today you are invited to download our just-released Special Report that reveals 5 stocks with the most potential to gain +100% or more in 2020. From those 5, Zacks Director of Research, Sheraz Mian hand-picks one to have the most explosive upside of all.
This pioneering tech ticker had soared to all-time highs and then subsided to a price that is irresistible. Now a pending acquisition could super-charge the company’s drive past competitors in the development of true Artificial Intelligence. The earlier you get in to this stock, the greater your potential gain.
Image: Bigstock
UBS Group (UBS) Fined by MAS Over Bond Price Malpractice
UBS Group AG (UBS - Free Report) has been fined S$11.2 million ($8 million) by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (“MAS”) for deceiving clients over prices of bonds and other structured products.
In 2016, UBS Group had reported misconduct by its client advisors, particularly in Singapore and Hong Kong, to the MAS. The MAS conducted investigations post that.
The MAS recently said that the investigation revealed that the Swiss banks’ advisers had deceived clients or engaged in acts that were likely to deceive them.
The MAS stated in a news release yesterday that the misconduct relates to “the spreads and/or interbank prices for transactions in over-the-counter (OTC) bonds and structured products.”
It added, “When UBS executed OTC transactions requested by its clients, it did so with interbank counterparties and its practice was to charge a spread over the interbank price that it obtained from the counterparty.”
The investigation showed that the client advisers of UBS Group in Singapore either did not stick to the spread or interbank price, which was agreed by the clients, or overcharged them in excess of the fees sent out in the fee disclosure documents.
The MAS added, “The client advisers’ actions were possible because OTC product prices were not readily accessible to clients for them to verify against the transacted prices advised by UBS. In addition, internal system weaknesses enabled the client advisers to increase the spread post-trade in the order management system.”
Ong Chong Tee, the deputy managing director, financial supervision at MAS, said, “The conduct of UBS through its representatives is unacceptable and has no place in the financial services industry where trust and integrity are paramount.”
Nevertheless, the MAS stated that UBS Group fully cooperated with the investigation. Also, the bank has paid the fine and has taken measures to compensate all clients affected by the malpractice, which took place between 2008 and 2017.
UBS Group stated, “The behavior of the individuals involved is unacceptable and in strong contrast to the behavioral principles of our firm.”
As a Swiss systemically relevant bank, UBS Group is subject to heightened regulatory supervision. Because of rise in regulatory costs, its bottom line is expected to remain under pressure.
Notably, UBS Group is also required to pay about HK$400 million to the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”) for having overcharged up to 5,000 clients between 2008 and 2015.
Shares of the bank have lost 1.8% so far this year against 3.9% growth of the industry it belongs to.
Currently, UBS Group carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Conclusion
Increased scrutiny on global banks for their business practices has caused many of these firms to pay billions of dollars as fines and compensation to settle lawsuits and probes. Many investors lost their hard-earned money due to such business malpractices.
Last month, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) said that two advisory units of Bank of Montreal (BMO - Free Report) agreed to pay a penalty of nearly $38 million for overcharging clients.
Deutsche Bank AG (DB - Free Report) recently agreed to pay $15 million in penalty to settle allegations that it exploited its market presence by overcharging clients for unsecured bonds issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac between 2009 and 2016.
In June 2019, State Street Corporation (STT - Free Report) agreed to pay $94.3 million for consistently overcharging mutual fund customers and other clients through concealed markups on back-office expenses for around 17 years.
Free: Zacks’ Single Best Stock Set to Double
Today you are invited to download our just-released Special Report that reveals 5 stocks with the most potential to gain +100% or more in 2020. From those 5, Zacks Director of Research, Sheraz Mian hand-picks one to have the most explosive upside of all.
This pioneering tech ticker had soared to all-time highs and then subsided to a price that is irresistible. Now a pending acquisition could super-charge the company’s drive past competitors in the development of true Artificial Intelligence. The earlier you get in to this stock, the greater your potential gain.
Download Free Report Now >>