We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, revised Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
The spike in oil tanker prices started after the Trump administration imposed sanctions on certain Chinese tanker companies, including Cosco (Dalian), on Sep 25, 2019. The U.S. Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) has informed that the COSCO parent company has not been sanctioned. It added that those that are included in the sanction list are COSCO Shipping Tanker (Dalian), COSCO Shipping Tanker (Dalian) Seaman & Ship Management, Kunlun Holding Co., China Concord Petroleum, Kunlun Shipping Co. and Pegasus 88. Notably, these sanctions were levied for carrying crude to China from Iran.
The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) 2020 rules requiring shippers to limit sulfur emissions to 0.5% will make it necessary for tankers to be either fitted with the proper equipment or use the compliant fuel. This is adding to the concern of limited supply of tankers in comparison to the demand and is playing a role in bumping up tanker prices, per a Bloomberg report.
In fact, no mechanism to put a check on tanker prices seems to be in sight. With the Middle-East tensions expected to flare-up, imposition of the IMO 2020 rule and lack of significant supply of oil tankers, the surge in oil tanker prices is expected to continue.
SEA ETF in Spotlight
Invesco Shipping ETF (SEA - Free Report) follows the Dow Jones Global Shipping Index, which measures the performance of high dividend-paying companies in the global shipping industry. It comprises 25 stocks with heavy concentration on the top firm. The fund has AUM of $49.5 million and charges 65 bps in annual fees. It trades in average daily volumes of 35,000 shares (read: Beyond Biotech, 5 ETFs Up At Least 10% in Q4).
Want key ETF info delivered straight to your inbox?
Zacks’ free Fund Newsletter will brief you on top news and analysis, as well as top-performing ETFs, each week. Get it free >>
See More Zacks Research for These Tickers
Normally $25 each - click below to receive one report FREE:
Image: Bigstock
SEA ETF a Buy on Rising Freight Costs Due to Mid-East Crisis
Rising Middle-East tensions have been bumping up freight charges and shipping costs for crude on key routes like from the Middle East to China, India, United States and Europe. In fact, the world’s largest oil-importing region— Asia — is still largely dependent on the Middle East for crude. The rates quoted for the supertankers shipping crude from the Persian Gulf to China vary between 165 and 180 in Worldscale terms (per a Bloomberg article). Before rising to this point, the rates were between 140 and 150 Worldscale points in the earlier part of this week. These rates compare with 122 before the U.S. airstrikes on Jan 3 (read: ETFs to Buy as Flare-up in Middle-East Tensions Spurs Volatility).
Let’s look at the major reason driving freight charges.
Iran Retaliates
In retaliation to the killing of their top Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani, Tehran fired more than a dozen ballistic missiles at least two Iraqi military bases holding U.S.-led coalition personnel. Moreover, Iran has announced plans of not following the limits on its enrichment of uranium, as under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) (read: Country ETFs to Top/Flop on US Air Raid at Baghdad).
Other Factors Driving Freight Charges
The spike in oil tanker prices started after the Trump administration imposed sanctions on certain Chinese tanker companies, including Cosco (Dalian), on Sep 25, 2019. The U.S. Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) has informed that the COSCO parent company has not been sanctioned. It added that those that are included in the sanction list are COSCO Shipping Tanker (Dalian), COSCO Shipping Tanker (Dalian) Seaman & Ship Management, Kunlun Holding Co., China Concord Petroleum, Kunlun Shipping Co. and Pegasus 88. Notably, these sanctions were levied for carrying crude to China from Iran.
The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) 2020 rules requiring shippers to limit sulfur emissions to 0.5% will make it necessary for tankers to be either fitted with the proper equipment or use the compliant fuel. This is adding to the concern of limited supply of tankers in comparison to the demand and is playing a role in bumping up tanker prices, per a Bloomberg report.
In fact, no mechanism to put a check on tanker prices seems to be in sight. With the Middle-East tensions expected to flare-up, imposition of the IMO 2020 rule and lack of significant supply of oil tankers, the surge in oil tanker prices is expected to continue.
SEA ETF in Spotlight
Invesco Shipping ETF (SEA - Free Report) follows the Dow Jones Global Shipping Index, which measures the performance of high dividend-paying companies in the global shipping industry. It comprises 25 stocks with heavy concentration on the top firm. The fund has AUM of $49.5 million and charges 65 bps in annual fees. It trades in average daily volumes of 35,000 shares (read: Beyond Biotech, 5 ETFs Up At Least 10% in Q4).
Want key ETF info delivered straight to your inbox?
Zacks’ free Fund Newsletter will brief you on top news and analysis, as well as top-performing ETFs, each week. Get it free >>