Back to top

DIREXION DAILY SMALL CAP BEAR 3X SHARES: (AMEX : TZA)

(U.S : AMEX) As of Apr 17, 2014 03:59 PM ET

 Add to portfolio

$16.83 USD

-0.26 (-1.52%)

Volume: 19,848,505

Zacks ETF Rank: 0 - Not Rated [?]          

This is our ETF rating system that serves as a timeliness indicator for ETFs over the next 6 months:

Zacks Rank Definition
1 Strong Buy
2 Buy
3 Hold
4 Sell
5 Strong Sell

Zacks Premium - The only way to get access to the Zacks Rank

ETF Quote Details

Previous Close 17.09
Open 17.21
Bid 16.74
Ask 16.82
Day Low-High 16.60-17.35
52wk Low-High 14.31-42.95
Volume 19,848,505
NAV (month end) 15.60
Premium (+)/Discount (-) (month end)+1.49

Zacks Premium Research for TZA

Zacks ETF Rank [?] Not rated 0
ETF Risk [?] NA
ETF Research Report

Learn to Profit from the Zacks Rank

Zacks proprietary quantitative models divide each set of ETFs following a similar investment strategy (style box/industry/asset class) into three risk categories- High, Medium, and Low. The aim of our models is to select the best ETFs within each risk category, so that investors can pick an ETF that matches their particular risk preference in order to better achieve their investment goals.

This is our ETF rating system that serves as a timeliness indicator for ETFs over the next 6 months:

Zacks Rank Definition
1 Strong Buy
2 Buy
3 Hold
4 Sell
5 Strong Sell

Zacks Premium - The only way to get access to the Zacks Rank

ETF Expense Ratio

Expense Ratio 0.95%
Dividend (Yield) $0.00 (0.00%)
Issuer DIREXION

Benchmark for TZA

RUSSELL 2000

The Russell 2000 Index measures the performance of the small-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe and is comprised of the smallest 2000 companies in the Russell 3000 Index, representing approximately 10% of the total market capitalization of that index. It includes approximately 2000 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership.

Fund Summary for TZA

DIREXION DAILY SMALL CAP BEAR 3X SHARES

The Small Cap Bear 3X ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the inverse (or opposite) of the performance of the Russell 2000.