We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
The fear is setting up a buy opportunity for tech investors.
DeepSeek Shakes Markets in 2025
On January 27, 2025, a relatively unknown Chinese-based artificial intelligence company shook up Wall Street. At the time, the AI buildout was in the early innings, and the majority of leading U.S-based technology stocks were at or near all-time highs. However, DeepSeek changed the narrative overnight when it launched its R1 AI model. The company claimed that, unlike leading AI companies like OpenAI and Alphabet ((GOOGL - Free Report) ), which require hundreds of billions of dollars in hardware, power, and data centers, it was able to build a rival model for a mere $5.6 million. Meanwhile, according to DeepSeek, it was able to bypass U.S. government controls on NVIDIA’s ((NVDA - Free Report) ) top chips and get similar results using fewer and older GPUs (A100s & H800s).
If DeepSeek’s claims were true, it would mean that hyperscalers like Meta Platforms ((META - Free Report) ) and Amazon ((AMZN - Free Report) ) were undercut after spending hundreds of billions of dollars on expensive AI infrastructure. In late January 2025, investors didn’t wait for an answer and instead sold first, and asked questions later. Wall Street would lose roughly $1 trillion in a single day while chip leader NVDA would plunge 17% on massive volume turnover.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
DeepSeek Fallout: Cooler Heads Prevailed
After the DeepSeek carnage, AI stocks slumped for a few months before fully recovering their losses (and then some). Below were the reasons for the recovery:
· “Jevons Paradox”: The main reason for the vicious recovery was that investors realized that efficiency does not equal demand. In fact, Jevons Paradox suggests exactly the opposite. That is, when costs come down, consumption explodes.
· CapEX Spending Stayed Steady: Despite the fear reverberating through Wall Street, big tech CEOs continued to commit billions to AI infrastructure, suggesting that they did not view the DeepSeek breakthrough as a reason to stop committing capital. Later, corporate earnings would suggest that the fundamentals of AI companies continued to grow despite the DeepSeek threat.
· Debunking Spending Claims: Following the knee-jerk reaction to DeepSeek, tech experts investigated and found that the $5.6 million in spending suggested by the company was misleading at best. The $5.6 million was instead an iteration on top of pre-existing hardware and multiple years of research and development.
Kimi K3: DeepSeek Déjà vu?
Currently, the Nasdaq 100 Index (QQQ) is having its worst July in over two decades. The reason for the sell-off is that a Beijing-based start-up named Moonshot AI released a flagship named Kimi K3. The open-source model is one of the most efficient AI models ever released, and its performance is said to be near or on par with top U.S AI models. Once again, investors are selling first and asking questions later amid CAPEX ROI anxiety and hardware demand concerns.
Atreides Management’s Gavin S. Baker is one of the top tech investors on Wall Street and worth listening to. In January 2025, Baker was one of the first on Wall Street to suggest that, contrary to popular belief, DeepSeek’s rise would be a buying opportunity and highly bullish for physical infrastructure and hardware providers. He was absolutely correct.
Gavin Baker’s Kimi K3 Take
In his latest comments, Baker argues that Kimi K3 may threaten the dominance of closed-source giants like OpenAI and Anthropic. Nevertheless, Baker notes that Kimi K3 may level the playing field and create healthier economics across the “AI cake.” Meanwhile, Baker’s July 16th social media post was more direct, writing:
“Risk reward seems attractive again. Lots of cheap stocks with durable competitive advantages that are going to crush numbers for the next 6-12 quarters. Time will tell!”
In other words, Baker seems to believe that, just like DeepSeek, the Kimi K3 fear, uncertainty, and doubt will create a buying opportunity.
Bottom Line
Kimi K3 has reignited AI cost fears and has decimated tech stocks. However, the current carnage is eerily similar to the DeepSeek disruption of early 2025.
View the Zacks #1 Rank List
Image: Bigstock
Kimi K3: DeepSeek 2.0, or is this Time Different?
Key Takeaways
DeepSeek Shakes Markets in 2025
On January 27, 2025, a relatively unknown Chinese-based artificial intelligence company shook up Wall Street. At the time, the AI buildout was in the early innings, and the majority of leading U.S-based technology stocks were at or near all-time highs. However, DeepSeek changed the narrative overnight when it launched its R1 AI model. The company claimed that, unlike leading AI companies like OpenAI and Alphabet ((GOOGL - Free Report) ), which require hundreds of billions of dollars in hardware, power, and data centers, it was able to build a rival model for a mere $5.6 million. Meanwhile, according to DeepSeek, it was able to bypass U.S. government controls on NVIDIA’s ((NVDA - Free Report) ) top chips and get similar results using fewer and older GPUs (A100s & H800s).
If DeepSeek’s claims were true, it would mean that hyperscalers like Meta Platforms ((META - Free Report) ) and Amazon ((AMZN - Free Report) ) were undercut after spending hundreds of billions of dollars on expensive AI infrastructure. In late January 2025, investors didn’t wait for an answer and instead sold first, and asked questions later. Wall Street would lose roughly $1 trillion in a single day while chip leader NVDA would plunge 17% on massive volume turnover.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
DeepSeek Fallout: Cooler Heads Prevailed
After the DeepSeek carnage, AI stocks slumped for a few months before fully recovering their losses (and then some). Below were the reasons for the recovery:
· “Jevons Paradox”: The main reason for the vicious recovery was that investors realized that efficiency does not equal demand. In fact, Jevons Paradox suggests exactly the opposite. That is, when costs come down, consumption explodes.
· CapEX Spending Stayed Steady: Despite the fear reverberating through Wall Street, big tech CEOs continued to commit billions to AI infrastructure, suggesting that they did not view the DeepSeek breakthrough as a reason to stop committing capital. Later, corporate earnings would suggest that the fundamentals of AI companies continued to grow despite the DeepSeek threat.
· Debunking Spending Claims: Following the knee-jerk reaction to DeepSeek, tech experts investigated and found that the $5.6 million in spending suggested by the company was misleading at best. The $5.6 million was instead an iteration on top of pre-existing hardware and multiple years of research and development.
Kimi K3: DeepSeek Déjà vu?
Currently, the Nasdaq 100 Index (QQQ) is having its worst July in over two decades. The reason for the sell-off is that a Beijing-based start-up named Moonshot AI released a flagship named Kimi K3. The open-source model is one of the most efficient AI models ever released, and its performance is said to be near or on par with top U.S AI models. Once again, investors are selling first and asking questions later amid CAPEX ROI anxiety and hardware demand concerns.
Atreides Management’s Gavin S. Baker is one of the top tech investors on Wall Street and worth listening to. In January 2025, Baker was one of the first on Wall Street to suggest that, contrary to popular belief, DeepSeek’s rise would be a buying opportunity and highly bullish for physical infrastructure and hardware providers. He was absolutely correct.
Gavin Baker’s Kimi K3 Take
In his latest comments, Baker argues that Kimi K3 may threaten the dominance of closed-source giants like OpenAI and Anthropic. Nevertheless, Baker notes that Kimi K3 may level the playing field and create healthier economics across the “AI cake.” Meanwhile, Baker’s July 16th social media post was more direct, writing:
“Risk reward seems attractive again. Lots of cheap stocks with durable competitive advantages that are going to crush numbers for the next 6-12 quarters. Time will tell!”
In other words, Baker seems to believe that, just like DeepSeek, the Kimi K3 fear, uncertainty, and doubt will create a buying opportunity.
Bottom Line
Kimi K3 has reignited AI cost fears and has decimated tech stocks. However, the current carnage is eerily similar to the DeepSeek disruption of early 2025.