We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Core Inflation Just Accelerated. The Fed Is Listening.
September's Consumer Price Index landed Wednesday morning, and the part that mattered was not the headline.
Prices rose 0.6% on the month, matching expectations, and 3.7% from a year ago against a 3.6% forecast — an acceleration from August's 3.4%. With Brent crude above $106 and gasoline running far above year-ago levels in the latest data, a hot headline was the easy call.
Core is where the report became uncomfortable. Stripping out food and energy, prices rose 0.3% on the month against a 0.2% consensus and 2.6% year over year against 2.5% expected. August core was 2.4%. That is two tenths of acceleration in a single month on the one series that cannot be blamed on a shipping lane.
Why the Core Number Carries Weight
The distinction matters more than usual right now. An energy-driven headline is something the Federal Reserve has historically been willing to look through, on the reasoning that oil shocks tend to resolve themselves and that monetary policy is a clumsy instrument against geopolitics.
Core accelerating is a different signal entirely. It suggests the pass-through from energy and tariffs is working its way into the broader basket rather than staying contained at the pump.
The policy context is what gives the print its teeth. New York Fed President John Williams said this week that one more rate hike may be needed this year, while suggesting further tightening likely would not be required in 2027. Ahead of the release, markets put roughly 80% odds on a hold at the October meeting but about 85% odds that the funds rate would be higher by December. Wednesday's data does nothing to shrink that second number.
The Threat Keeps Changing Address
For anyone watching the AI complex over the past week, a pattern deserves naming. Thursday the worry was demand — whether AI revenues arrive to justify all the capital spending. Monday it became supply, after China's ChangXin Memory Technologies announced progress on a denser memory cell design and signaled an intention to bring a server product to market by year-end.
Those are opposite concerns. One says the earnings will not be there. The other says the earnings will be there but the margins will not last. That both produced selling in the same names within three sessions tells you the positioning is crowded enough that any new argument finds willing sellers.
Wednesday supplied a third address, and it has the broadest reach of the three. CXMT's announcement, whatever its eventual merit, is a question about one industry's pricing power. Core inflation at 2.6% with a Fed official openly floating another hike is a question about every multiple in the market — and the AI complex carries the highest ones.
Duration Is the Vulnerability
A company whose value rests on cash flows arriving in the coming years is a long-duration asset, and long-duration assets are sensitive instruments relative to the rate used to discount them. That is why the ten-year note sitting above 5.2% has functioned as a quiet headwind all autumn even while the major indexes were printing highs.
Notice what has actually been happening beneath those highs. The damage has been concentrated and rotational rather than broad. Eight of eleven S&P 500 (SPY - Free Report) sectors finished higher on Monday while the Nasdaq fell and energy led. That is not a market in retreat; it is a market reallocating away from certain exposures while everything else holds up perfectly well. A core print that revives hike expectations accelerates precisely that process.
Bottom Line
Still, one month does not make a trend. Core at 2.6% is uncomfortable, but it is not 2022, and a single hot print arriving the same week as an oil shock and a mixed bank earnings season is at least as likely to be noise as signal. The Fed has been wrong-footed by one-month inflections in both directions over the past few years.
What changed Wednesday morning is not the AI earnings story, which remains intact and is still producing some of the best growth in the market. What changed is the rate at which investors discount that story, and the confidence with which they can assume the Fed is finished.
The Fed's October meeting and the next core reading now belong on the calendar alongside the earnings dates — not because the thesis has broken, but because the discount rate has become the variable with the most leverage over how that thesis gets priced.
View the Zacks #1 Rank List
Image: Shutterstock
Core Inflation Just Accelerated. The Fed Is Listening.
September's Consumer Price Index landed Wednesday morning, and the part that mattered was not the headline.
Prices rose 0.6% on the month, matching expectations, and 3.7% from a year ago against a 3.6% forecast — an acceleration from August's 3.4%. With Brent crude above $106 and gasoline running far above year-ago levels in the latest data, a hot headline was the easy call.
Core is where the report became uncomfortable. Stripping out food and energy, prices rose 0.3% on the month against a 0.2% consensus and 2.6% year over year against 2.5% expected. August core was 2.4%. That is two tenths of acceleration in a single month on the one series that cannot be blamed on a shipping lane.
Why the Core Number Carries Weight
The distinction matters more than usual right now. An energy-driven headline is something the Federal Reserve has historically been willing to look through, on the reasoning that oil shocks tend to resolve themselves and that monetary policy is a clumsy instrument against geopolitics.
Core accelerating is a different signal entirely. It suggests the pass-through from energy and tariffs is working its way into the broader basket rather than staying contained at the pump.
The policy context is what gives the print its teeth. New York Fed President John Williams said this week that one more rate hike may be needed this year, while suggesting further tightening likely would not be required in 2027. Ahead of the release, markets put roughly 80% odds on a hold at the October meeting but about 85% odds that the funds rate would be higher by December. Wednesday's data does nothing to shrink that second number.
The Threat Keeps Changing Address
For anyone watching the AI complex over the past week, a pattern deserves naming. Thursday the worry was demand — whether AI revenues arrive to justify all the capital spending. Monday it became supply, after China's ChangXin Memory Technologies announced progress on a denser memory cell design and signaled an intention to bring a server product to market by year-end.
Those are opposite concerns. One says the earnings will not be there. The other says the earnings will be there but the margins will not last. That both produced selling in the same names within three sessions tells you the positioning is crowded enough that any new argument finds willing sellers.
Wednesday supplied a third address, and it has the broadest reach of the three. CXMT's announcement, whatever its eventual merit, is a question about one industry's pricing power. Core inflation at 2.6% with a Fed official openly floating another hike is a question about every multiple in the market — and the AI complex carries the highest ones.
Duration Is the Vulnerability
A company whose value rests on cash flows arriving in the coming years is a long-duration asset, and long-duration assets are sensitive instruments relative to the rate used to discount them. That is why the ten-year note sitting above 5.2% has functioned as a quiet headwind all autumn even while the major indexes were printing highs.
Notice what has actually been happening beneath those highs. The damage has been concentrated and rotational rather than broad. Eight of eleven S&P 500 (SPY - Free Report) sectors finished higher on Monday while the Nasdaq fell and energy led. That is not a market in retreat; it is a market reallocating away from certain exposures while everything else holds up perfectly well. A core print that revives hike expectations accelerates precisely that process.
Bottom Line
Still, one month does not make a trend. Core at 2.6% is uncomfortable, but it is not 2022, and a single hot print arriving the same week as an oil shock and a mixed bank earnings season is at least as likely to be noise as signal. The Fed has been wrong-footed by one-month inflections in both directions over the past few years.
What changed Wednesday morning is not the AI earnings story, which remains intact and is still producing some of the best growth in the market. What changed is the rate at which investors discount that story, and the confidence with which they can assume the Fed is finished.
The Fed's October meeting and the next core reading now belong on the calendar alongside the earnings dates — not because the thesis has broken, but because the discount rate has become the variable with the most leverage over how that thesis gets priced.