We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Mitsubishi (MUFG) Units Get Business Improvement Order by FSA
Read MoreHide Full Article
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG - Free Report) provided an update regarding administrative action against MUFG Bank and Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co., Ltd. (MUMSS) by Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA). The action was taken for breaching the regulations governing client confidentiality.
The FSA issued business improvement orders to MUFG Bank and MUMSS under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and orders to submit reports to MUFG and MUFG Bank under the Banking Act (Articles 52, paragraph 31-1 and 24, paragraph 1).
The FSA move came after the Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC) recommended administrative action for sharing client confidential data on at least 26 occasions between MUFG Bank and one of its two securities firms — Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities and Morgan Stanley MUFG Securities.
MUFG management stated, “We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience and concern this is causing our customers and other stakeholders.”
To prevent a recurrence, MUFG, MUFG Bank and MUMSS will have to take this administrative action seriously. Accordingly, the three will have to fortify their frameworks and implement more sensible procedures for legal compliance, among other things, on the cooperative operation between banking and securities.
To thoroughly disseminate information internally as quickly as possible, the companies plan to use training and study sessions. In the medium- to long-term, they intend to strengthen monitoring systems, including system development. At the same time, they will formulate and disseminate procedures and rules suited to actual cases and conditions in the short term.
MUFG, MUFG Bank and MUMSS plan to submit business improvement strategies and reports related to this issue to the FSA based on these business improvement orders.
In light of these administrative proceedings, MUFG Bank will clarify where responsibility resides, including with management. Based on an examination of the underlying reasons for these accidents, it will swiftly create and progressively carry out an efficient company improvement plan.
The companies will reinforce internal control systems, including management systems, legal compliance systems related to banking-securities collaboration and customer information management systems.
To comply with Article 12 of the Banking Act's prohibition on engaging in other business and Article 12 paragraph 2-2 of the Banking Act's regulation of management of customer information, MUFG will verify the facts of the incidents at MUFG Bank, its subsidiary. As MUFG Bank's parent company, MUFG will then analyze the incidents' causes, including any underlying reasons and identify any issues based on these analyses.
In the past six months, shares of MUFG have appreciated 16.7% compared with the industry’s 2.9% growth.
In the past six months, many other banks, including JPMorgan (JPM - Free Report) and Barclays PLC (BCS - Free Report) , have been subject to legal action.
In February 2024, a class-action lawsuit was filed by five customers against JPMorgan, claiming that the bank charged unconscionable fees for unintentionally depositing checks that bounced.
Per the suit filed in the White Plains, New York federal court, JPM charged customers up to $30 for a “deposited item return fee” after checks they tried to deposit bounced for no fault of theirs.
Likewise, as part of an industry-wide investigation into lenders’ exposure to the private equity industry, Britain’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) asked Barclays to review its exposure to leveraged finance. The news was first reported by Bloomberg, citing a source familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified.
Per the people with knowledge of the matter, the PRA asked Barclays to commission a section 166 review of the business. Such a review forces a firm to bring in an outside expert to examine their practices and produce an independent report for the authorities, which can then prompt further action if necessary.
See More Zacks Research for These Tickers
Normally $25 each - click below to receive one report FREE:
Image: Bigstock
Mitsubishi (MUFG) Units Get Business Improvement Order by FSA
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG - Free Report) provided an update regarding administrative action against MUFG Bank and Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co., Ltd. (MUMSS) by Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA). The action was taken for breaching the regulations governing client confidentiality.
The FSA issued business improvement orders to MUFG Bank and MUMSS under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and orders to submit reports to MUFG and MUFG Bank under the Banking Act (Articles 52, paragraph 31-1 and 24, paragraph 1).
The FSA move came after the Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC) recommended administrative action for sharing client confidential data on at least 26 occasions between MUFG Bank and one of its two securities firms — Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities and Morgan Stanley MUFG Securities.
The FSA has penalized MUFG units on account of this client data breach.
MUFG management stated, “We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience and concern this is causing our customers and other stakeholders.”
To prevent a recurrence, MUFG, MUFG Bank and MUMSS will have to take this administrative action seriously. Accordingly, the three will have to fortify their frameworks and implement more sensible procedures for legal compliance, among other things, on the cooperative operation between banking and securities.
To thoroughly disseminate information internally as quickly as possible, the companies plan to use training and study sessions. In the medium- to long-term, they intend to strengthen monitoring systems, including system development. At the same time, they will formulate and disseminate procedures and rules suited to actual cases and conditions in the short term.
MUFG, MUFG Bank and MUMSS plan to submit business improvement strategies and reports related to this issue to the FSA based on these business improvement orders.
In light of these administrative proceedings, MUFG Bank will clarify where responsibility resides, including with management. Based on an examination of the underlying reasons for these accidents, it will swiftly create and progressively carry out an efficient company improvement plan.
The companies will reinforce internal control systems, including management systems, legal compliance systems related to banking-securities collaboration and customer information management systems.
To comply with Article 12 of the Banking Act's prohibition on engaging in other business and Article 12 paragraph 2-2 of the Banking Act's regulation of management of customer information, MUFG will verify the facts of the incidents at MUFG Bank, its subsidiary. As MUFG Bank's parent company, MUFG will then analyze the incidents' causes, including any underlying reasons and identify any issues based on these analyses.
In the past six months, shares of MUFG have appreciated 16.7% compared with the industry’s 2.9% growth.
Currently, MUFG carries a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell).
You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
In the past six months, many other banks, including JPMorgan (JPM - Free Report) and Barclays PLC (BCS - Free Report) , have been subject to legal action.
In February 2024, a class-action lawsuit was filed by five customers against JPMorgan, claiming that the bank charged unconscionable fees for unintentionally depositing checks that bounced.
Per the suit filed in the White Plains, New York federal court, JPM charged customers up to $30 for a “deposited item return fee” after checks they tried to deposit bounced for no fault of theirs.
Likewise, as part of an industry-wide investigation into lenders’ exposure to the private equity industry, Britain’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) asked Barclays to review its exposure to leveraged finance. The news was first reported by Bloomberg, citing a source familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified.
Per the people with knowledge of the matter, the PRA asked Barclays to commission a section 166 review of the business. Such a review forces a firm to bring in an outside expert to examine their practices and produce an independent report for the authorities, which can then prompt further action if necessary.