We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Big Banks Sue the Fed Over Lack of Transparency in Annual Stress Test
Read MoreHide Full Article
The Bank Policy Institute (“BPI”), consisting of major banks like JPMorgan (JPM - Free Report) , Citigroup, Inc. (C - Free Report) , and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS - Free Report) , has filed a lawsuit against the Federal Reserve over the annual stress testing framework and its transparency.
These major banks have joined the American Bankers Association, the Ohio Bankers League, the Ohio Chamber of Commerce and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to file a combined lawsuit.
Details of the Lawsuit
The Fed’s stress test is an annual examination to assess the impact of a series of catastrophic economic scenarios on big banks such as JPM, C and GS. The results are used for the calculation of overall capital buffer requirements to provide a cushion against such losses. It further dictates the size of share repurchases and dividends.
The lawsuit claims that the Fed’s stress test procedure doesn’t follow adequate administrative procedure.
Specifically, the plaintiff parties want the Fed to publish its stress test models and scenarios and allow public comments and notifications on future models.
In the lawsuit, the banking groups stated that they don’t oppose annual stress. However, the existing process falls short and “produces vacillating and unexplained requirements and restrictions on bank capital.”
Further, the banks complained that uncertainties surrounding the test results and future regulations make it difficult for banks to plan and manage capital effectively, leading to higher borrowing costs for customers. Also, these weaken banks’ market-making and capital markets capabilities, essential for economic growth.
Are the Proposed Fed Changes Enough?
On Monday, the Fed announced that it is considering proposing changes to the stress tests and will be seeking public comment on what it calls “significant changes to improve the transparency of its bank stress tests and to reduce the volatility of resulting capital buffer requirements.”
The central bank, determined to modify the tests amid an evolving legal landscape, aims to reduce the volatility of the results and improve model transparency. The public comment process on stress test is likely to begin in early 2025.
Though JPM, C, GS and other major banks will likely perceive the changes as a win, the alterations may not go far enough to address the banks’ concerns regarding strenuous capital requirements. The Fed stated, “These proposed changes are not designed to materially affect overall capital requirements.”
See More Zacks Research for These Tickers
Normally $25 each - click below to receive one report FREE:
Image: Bigstock
Big Banks Sue the Fed Over Lack of Transparency in Annual Stress Test
The Bank Policy Institute (“BPI”), consisting of major banks like JPMorgan (JPM - Free Report) , Citigroup, Inc. (C - Free Report) , and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS - Free Report) , has filed a lawsuit against the Federal Reserve over the annual stress testing framework and its transparency.
These major banks have joined the American Bankers Association, the Ohio Bankers League, the Ohio Chamber of Commerce and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to file a combined lawsuit.
Details of the Lawsuit
The Fed’s stress test is an annual examination to assess the impact of a series of catastrophic economic scenarios on big banks such as JPM, C and GS. The results are used for the calculation of overall capital buffer requirements to provide a cushion against such losses. It further dictates the size of share repurchases and dividends.
The lawsuit claims that the Fed’s stress test procedure doesn’t follow adequate administrative procedure.
Specifically, the plaintiff parties want the Fed to publish its stress test models and scenarios and allow public comments and notifications on future models.
In the lawsuit, the banking groups stated that they don’t oppose annual stress. However, the existing process falls short and “produces vacillating and unexplained requirements and restrictions on bank capital.”
Further, the banks complained that uncertainties surrounding the test results and future regulations make it difficult for banks to plan and manage capital effectively, leading to higher borrowing costs for customers. Also, these weaken banks’ market-making and capital markets capabilities, essential for economic growth.
Are the Proposed Fed Changes Enough?
On Monday, the Fed announced that it is considering proposing changes to the stress tests and will be seeking public comment on what it calls “significant changes to improve the transparency of its bank stress tests and to reduce the volatility of resulting capital buffer requirements.”
The central bank, determined to modify the tests amid an evolving legal landscape, aims to reduce the volatility of the results and improve model transparency. The public comment process on stress test is likely to begin in early 2025.
Though JPM, C, GS and other major banks will likely perceive the changes as a win, the alterations may not go far enough to address the banks’ concerns regarding strenuous capital requirements. The Fed stated, “These proposed changes are not designed to materially affect overall capital requirements.”