We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
B vs. KGC: Which Gold Mining Stock is the Better Pick Now?
Read MoreHide Full Article
Barrick Mining Corporation (B - Free Report) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC - Free Report) are two prominent players in the gold mining space with global operations. While gold prices have fallen from their April 2025 highs amid U.S.-China trade negotiations and easing U.S. inflation, they remain favorable, aided by economic uncertainties, and are currently hovering above the $3,200 per ounce level. Amid this backdrop, comparing these two major gold producers is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to the precious metals sector.
Despite the recent pullback due to easing trade tensions, gold prices have gained roughly 23% this year. The aggressive trade policies, including sweeping new import tariffs announced by President Donald Trump, intensified global trade tensions and heightened investor anxiety, leading to the price rally. Also, central banks worldwide have been accumulating gold reserves, led by risks arising from Trump’s policies. Prices of the yellow metal catapulted to a record high of $3,500 per ounce on April 22 amid President Trump's criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and call for an immediate reduction in interest rates. Increased purchases by central banks, hopes of interest rate cuts, and geopolitical tensions are expected to support gold prices.
Let’s dive deep and closely compare the fundamentals of these two Canada-based gold miners to determine which one is a better investment now.
The Case for Barrick
Barrick is well-placed to benefit from the progress in key growth projects that should significantly contribute to its production. Its major gold and copper growth projects, including Goldrush, the Pueblo Viejo plant expansion and mine life extension, Fourmile, Lumwana Super Pit and Reko Diq, are being executed. These projects are advancing on schedule and within budget, laying the groundwork for the next generation of profitable production.
The Goldrush mine is ramping up to a targeted 400,000 ounces of production per annum by 2028. Bordering Goldrush is the 100% Barrick-owned Fourmile, which is yielding grades double those of Goldrush and is anticipated to become another Tier One mine. The project has progressed to a prefeasibility study on the back of a successful drilling program. The Reko Diq copper-gold project in Pakistan is designed to produce 460,000 tons of copper and 520,000 ounces of gold annually in its second development phase. The first production is expected by the end of 2028.
In October 2024, Barrick announced the commencement of the development of a Super Pit at its Lumwana copper mine in Zambia. The Super Pit Expansion entails doubling the present process circuit's throughput and substantially boosting mining volumes. Upon completion, the $2 billion project has the potential to transform Lumwana into a long-term, high-yielding, top-25 copper producer and Tier One copper mine. The expansion is expected to deliver 240,000 tons of copper production annually over the life of the mine.
Barrick has a solid liquidity position and generates healthy cash flows, positioning it well to take advantage of attractive development, exploration and acquisition opportunities, drive shareholder value and reduce debt. At the end of first-quarter 2025, Barrick’s cash and cash equivalents were around $4.1 billion. It generated strong operating cash flows of roughly $1.2 billion in the quarter, up 59% year over year. Free cash flow surged to around $375 million in the first quarter from $32 million in the prior-year quarter. Barrick returned $1.2 billion to its shareholders in 2024 through dividends and repurchases. Barrick’s board, in February 2025, authorized a new program for the repurchase of up to $1 billion of its outstanding common shares. It repurchased shares worth $143 million under this program during the first quarter.
Barrick offers a healthy dividend yield of 2.2% at the current stock price. Its payout ratio is 28% (a ratio below 60% is a good indicator that the dividend will be sustainable), with a five-year annualized dividend growth rate of roughly 5.1%.
The Case for Kinross
Kinross has a strong production profile and boasts a promising pipeline of exploration and development projects. Its key development projects and exploration programs, including Great Bear in Ontario and Round Mountain Phase X in Nevada, remain on track. These projects are expected to boost production and cash flow and deliver significant value. KGC also completed the commissioning of its Manh Choh project and commenced production during the third quarter of 2024, leading to a substantial increase in cash flow at the Fort Knox operation.
Tasiast and Paracatu, the company’s two biggest assets, remain the key contributors to cash flow generation and production. Tasiast remains the lowest-cost asset within its portfolio, with consistently strong performance. Tasiast achieved record annual production and cash flow in 2024 and is on track to meet its full-year 2025 guidance. Paracatu saw a strong start to the year, with first-quarter production rising on strong grades and improved mill recoveries.
KGC has a strong liquidity position and generates substantial cash flows, which allows it to finance its development projects, pay down debt and drive shareholder value. The company ended the first quarter with solid liquidity of roughly $2.3 billion. Kinross also generated record free cash flows of around $1.3 billion in 2024, driven by the strength in gold prices and strong operating margins. Free cash flow also more than doubled year over year to $370.8 million in the first quarter.
KGC repaid $800 million of debt during 2024 and the remaining $200 million of its term loan in the first quarter, reducing its net debt to around $540 million. Its long-term debt-to-capitalization is 14.4% compared with Barrick’s 12.3%. KGC also offers a dividend yield of 0.9% at the current stock price. It has a payout ratio of 14%, with a five-year annualized dividend growth rate of about -0.1%.
Price Performance and Valuation of B & KGC
Year to date, Barrick stock has gained 17.4%, while KGC stock has rallied 50.6% compared with the Zacks Mining – Gold industry’s increase of 36.4%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Barrick is currently trading at a forward 12-month earnings multiple of 9.74, lower than its five-year median. This represents a roughly 28% discount when stacked up with the industry average of 13.57X.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Kinross is trading at a premium to Barrick. The KGC stock is currently trading at a forward 12-month earnings multiple of 12.88, below the industry.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
How Does Zacks Consensus Estimate Compare for B & KGC?
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for B’s 2025 sales and EPS implies a year-over-year rise of 15.2% and 34.9%, respectively. The EPS estimates for 2025 have been trending higher over the past 60 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The consensus estimate for KGC’s 2025 sales and EPS implies year-over-year growth of 13.9% and 52.9%, respectively. The EPS estimates for 2025 have been trending northward over the past 60 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
(Find the latest EPS estimates and surprises on Zacks Earnings Calendar.)
B or KGC: Which Stock Should You Bet on Now?
Both Barrick and Kinross are well-positioned to capitalize on the current gold price environment. Both have a strong pipeline of development projects, solid financial health and strong earnings growth prospects, and are seeing favorable estimate revisions. Barrick appears to have an edge over Kinross due to its more attractive valuation and higher dividend yield. B’s lower leverage also suggests lower financial risks. Investors seeking exposure to the gold space might consider Barrick as the more favorable option at this time.
Image: Bigstock
B vs. KGC: Which Gold Mining Stock is the Better Pick Now?
Barrick Mining Corporation (B - Free Report) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC - Free Report) are two prominent players in the gold mining space with global operations. While gold prices have fallen from their April 2025 highs amid U.S.-China trade negotiations and easing U.S. inflation, they remain favorable, aided by economic uncertainties, and are currently hovering above the $3,200 per ounce level. Amid this backdrop, comparing these two major gold producers is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to the precious metals sector.
Despite the recent pullback due to easing trade tensions, gold prices have gained roughly 23% this year. The aggressive trade policies, including sweeping new import tariffs announced by President Donald Trump, intensified global trade tensions and heightened investor anxiety, leading to the price rally. Also, central banks worldwide have been accumulating gold reserves, led by risks arising from Trump’s policies. Prices of the yellow metal catapulted to a record high of $3,500 per ounce on April 22 amid President Trump's criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and call for an immediate reduction in interest rates. Increased purchases by central banks, hopes of interest rate cuts, and geopolitical tensions are expected to support gold prices.
Let’s dive deep and closely compare the fundamentals of these two Canada-based gold miners to determine which one is a better investment now.
The Case for Barrick
Barrick is well-placed to benefit from the progress in key growth projects that should significantly contribute to its production. Its major gold and copper growth projects, including Goldrush, the Pueblo Viejo plant expansion and mine life extension, Fourmile, Lumwana Super Pit and Reko Diq, are being executed. These projects are advancing on schedule and within budget, laying the groundwork for the next generation of profitable production.
The Goldrush mine is ramping up to a targeted 400,000 ounces of production per annum by 2028. Bordering Goldrush is the 100% Barrick-owned Fourmile, which is yielding grades double those of Goldrush and is anticipated to become another Tier One mine. The project has progressed to a prefeasibility study on the back of a successful drilling program. The Reko Diq copper-gold project in Pakistan is designed to produce 460,000 tons of copper and 520,000 ounces of gold annually in its second development phase. The first production is expected by the end of 2028.
In October 2024, Barrick announced the commencement of the development of a Super Pit at its Lumwana copper mine in Zambia. The Super Pit Expansion entails doubling the present process circuit's throughput and substantially boosting mining volumes. Upon completion, the $2 billion project has the potential to transform Lumwana into a long-term, high-yielding, top-25 copper producer and Tier One copper mine. The expansion is expected to deliver 240,000 tons of copper production annually over the life of the mine.
Barrick has a solid liquidity position and generates healthy cash flows, positioning it well to take advantage of attractive development, exploration and acquisition opportunities, drive shareholder value and reduce debt. At the end of first-quarter 2025, Barrick’s cash and cash equivalents were around $4.1 billion. It generated strong operating cash flows of roughly $1.2 billion in the quarter, up 59% year over year. Free cash flow surged to around $375 million in the first quarter from $32 million in the prior-year quarter. Barrick returned $1.2 billion to its shareholders in 2024 through dividends and repurchases. Barrick’s board, in February 2025, authorized a new program for the repurchase of up to $1 billion of its outstanding common shares. It repurchased shares worth $143 million under this program during the first quarter.
Barrick offers a healthy dividend yield of 2.2% at the current stock price. Its payout ratio is 28% (a ratio below 60% is a good indicator that the dividend will be sustainable), with a five-year annualized dividend growth rate of roughly 5.1%.
The Case for Kinross
Kinross has a strong production profile and boasts a promising pipeline of exploration and development projects. Its key development projects and exploration programs, including Great Bear in Ontario and Round Mountain Phase X in Nevada, remain on track. These projects are expected to boost production and cash flow and deliver significant value. KGC also completed the commissioning of its Manh Choh project and commenced production during the third quarter of 2024, leading to a substantial increase in cash flow at the Fort Knox operation.
Tasiast and Paracatu, the company’s two biggest assets, remain the key contributors to cash flow generation and production. Tasiast remains the lowest-cost asset within its portfolio, with consistently strong performance. Tasiast achieved record annual production and cash flow in 2024 and is on track to meet its full-year 2025 guidance. Paracatu saw a strong start to the year, with first-quarter production rising on strong grades and improved mill recoveries.
KGC has a strong liquidity position and generates substantial cash flows, which allows it to finance its development projects, pay down debt and drive shareholder value. The company ended the first quarter with solid liquidity of roughly $2.3 billion. Kinross also generated record free cash flows of around $1.3 billion in 2024, driven by the strength in gold prices and strong operating margins. Free cash flow also more than doubled year over year to $370.8 million in the first quarter.
KGC repaid $800 million of debt during 2024 and the remaining $200 million of its term loan in the first quarter, reducing its net debt to around $540 million. Its long-term debt-to-capitalization is 14.4% compared with Barrick’s 12.3%. KGC also offers a dividend yield of 0.9% at the current stock price. It has a payout ratio of 14%, with a five-year annualized dividend growth rate of about -0.1%.
Price Performance and Valuation of B & KGC
Year to date, Barrick stock has gained 17.4%, while KGC stock has rallied 50.6% compared with the Zacks Mining – Gold industry’s increase of 36.4%.
Barrick is currently trading at a forward 12-month earnings multiple of 9.74, lower than its five-year median. This represents a roughly 28% discount when stacked up with the industry average of 13.57X.
Kinross is trading at a premium to Barrick. The KGC stock is currently trading at a forward 12-month earnings multiple of 12.88, below the industry.
How Does Zacks Consensus Estimate Compare for B & KGC?
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for B’s 2025 sales and EPS implies a year-over-year rise of 15.2% and 34.9%, respectively. The EPS estimates for 2025 have been trending higher over the past 60 days.
The consensus estimate for KGC’s 2025 sales and EPS implies year-over-year growth of 13.9% and 52.9%, respectively. The EPS estimates for 2025 have been trending northward over the past 60 days.
(Find the latest EPS estimates and surprises on Zacks Earnings Calendar.)
B or KGC: Which Stock Should You Bet on Now?
Both Barrick and Kinross are well-positioned to capitalize on the current gold price environment. Both have a strong pipeline of development projects, solid financial health and strong earnings growth prospects, and are seeing favorable estimate revisions. Barrick appears to have an edge over Kinross due to its more attractive valuation and higher dividend yield. B’s lower leverage also suggests lower financial risks. Investors seeking exposure to the gold space might consider Barrick as the more favorable option at this time.
B currently sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), whereas KGC has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.