We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Who Will Win Guyana's Oil? Chevron and ExxonMobil Face Off
Read MoreHide Full Article
A high-stakes corporate clash is unfolding between Chevron (CVX - Free Report) and ExxonMobil (XOM - Free Report) — two of the world’s largest oil companies. At the heart of the dispute is Guyana’s offshore Stabroek Block, a massive oil field with over 11 billion barrels of recoverable reserves. Chevron’s planned $53 billion acquisition of Hess Corporation (HES - Free Report) , which owns a 30% stake in the block, is now facing fierce resistance from ExxonMobil, the project’s operator and 45% stakeholder. ExxonMobil, along with its Chinese partner CNOOC (25% stake), claims it has a contractual right of first refusal (ROFR) that would allow it to either block or match Chevron’s bid.
Chevron and Hess argue that the clause doesn’t apply in this case. They maintain the ROFR is triggered only in direct asset sales, not in full corporate mergers like theirs. ExxonMobil, meanwhile, contends that because Hess’s value is overwhelmingly tied to its Guyana interest — reportedly around 70% — the distinction between an asset and entity sale is largely irrelevant. With both sides unwilling to back down, the issue has landed in arbitration under the International Chamber of Commerce. The confidential hearing is set to begin today, with a final ruling expected by the end of the third quarter.
Why Chevron Needs Hess
For Chevron, the stakes are enormous. Its oil and gas reserves fell to 9.8 billion barrels at the end of 2024, the lowest level in over a decade. Adding Hess’s Guyana stake is seen as vital to reversing that trend and improving its reserve replacement ratio. A win in arbitration would give Chevron access to one of the few remaining high-growth, low-cost basins, helping to secure its long-term production outlook. A loss, however, would leave it scrambling for another transformative acquisition at a time when large-scale opportunities are limited.
The transaction has already been approved by Chevron’s shareholders and cleared by U.S. regulators, but its fate now rests on the tribunal’s interpretation of a joint operating agreement drafted more than a decade ago. In anticipation of a positive outcome, Chevron has bought roughly 5% of Hess’s outstanding shares in the open market. Traders and hedge funds are also heavily invested, with more than $10 billion worth of Hess stock purchased by merger-arbitrage funds betting on a favorable ruling.
Exxon’s Stand and Broader Implications
ExxonMobil views Hess’ exit to Chevron as a disruption of a long-standing partnership and a threat to its control of the Guyana project. Exxon CEO Darren Woods has defended the Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) company’s position, arguing that it took early development risks when few others would and that its rights under the operating agreement must be upheld. Behind the legal battle lies a strategic concern. Letting Chevron in could weaken Exxon’s influence in what is quickly becoming the most important oil basin in the Western Hemisphere.
The dispute has cooled what was once a cordial relationship between Woods and Chevron CEO Mike Wirth. Legal observers believe the case may come down to how a few key terms are interpreted in the joint operating agreement. The ruling, expected by Q3, could set a precedent for how future pre-emption rights are applied in corporate acquisitions, especially in high-value energy ventures.
No matter how the arbitration ends, the case will have a lasting effect. Whether Chevron gains a critical growth engine or Exxon consolidates control, the outcome will shape strategic decisions across the Oil/Energy sector for years to come.
See More Zacks Research for These Tickers
Normally $25 each - click below to receive one report FREE:
Image: Bigstock
Who Will Win Guyana's Oil? Chevron and ExxonMobil Face Off
A high-stakes corporate clash is unfolding between Chevron (CVX - Free Report) and ExxonMobil (XOM - Free Report) — two of the world’s largest oil companies. At the heart of the dispute is Guyana’s offshore Stabroek Block, a massive oil field with over 11 billion barrels of recoverable reserves. Chevron’s planned $53 billion acquisition of Hess Corporation (HES - Free Report) , which owns a 30% stake in the block, is now facing fierce resistance from ExxonMobil, the project’s operator and 45% stakeholder. ExxonMobil, along with its Chinese partner CNOOC (25% stake), claims it has a contractual right of first refusal (ROFR) that would allow it to either block or match Chevron’s bid.
Chevron and Hess argue that the clause doesn’t apply in this case. They maintain the ROFR is triggered only in direct asset sales, not in full corporate mergers like theirs. ExxonMobil, meanwhile, contends that because Hess’s value is overwhelmingly tied to its Guyana interest — reportedly around 70% — the distinction between an asset and entity sale is largely irrelevant. With both sides unwilling to back down, the issue has landed in arbitration under the International Chamber of Commerce. The confidential hearing is set to begin today, with a final ruling expected by the end of the third quarter.
Why Chevron Needs Hess
For Chevron, the stakes are enormous. Its oil and gas reserves fell to 9.8 billion barrels at the end of 2024, the lowest level in over a decade. Adding Hess’s Guyana stake is seen as vital to reversing that trend and improving its reserve replacement ratio. A win in arbitration would give Chevron access to one of the few remaining high-growth, low-cost basins, helping to secure its long-term production outlook. A loss, however, would leave it scrambling for another transformative acquisition at a time when large-scale opportunities are limited.
The transaction has already been approved by Chevron’s shareholders and cleared by U.S. regulators, but its fate now rests on the tribunal’s interpretation of a joint operating agreement drafted more than a decade ago. In anticipation of a positive outcome, Chevron has bought roughly 5% of Hess’s outstanding shares in the open market. Traders and hedge funds are also heavily invested, with more than $10 billion worth of Hess stock purchased by merger-arbitrage funds betting on a favorable ruling.
Exxon’s Stand and Broader Implications
ExxonMobil views Hess’ exit to Chevron as a disruption of a long-standing partnership and a threat to its control of the Guyana project. Exxon CEO Darren Woods has defended the Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) company’s position, arguing that it took early development risks when few others would and that its rights under the operating agreement must be upheld. Behind the legal battle lies a strategic concern. Letting Chevron in could weaken Exxon’s influence in what is quickly becoming the most important oil basin in the Western Hemisphere.
You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
The dispute has cooled what was once a cordial relationship between Woods and Chevron CEO Mike Wirth. Legal observers believe the case may come down to how a few key terms are interpreted in the joint operating agreement. The ruling, expected by Q3, could set a precedent for how future pre-emption rights are applied in corporate acquisitions, especially in high-value energy ventures.
No matter how the arbitration ends, the case will have a lasting effect. Whether Chevron gains a critical growth engine or Exxon consolidates control, the outcome will shape strategic decisions across the Oil/Energy sector for years to come.