We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
A judge ruled that COF must face claims of unjust enrichment and violation of a federal fraud law.
COF denies wrongdoing, stating merchants and not the bank control affiliate commission decisions.
Capital One (COF - Free Report) will have to face a lawsuit by social media creators who claim that the bank’s free browser extension deprived them of commissions on sales generated through their content.
Details of the Lawsuit Against Capital One
In a ruling issued Monday night, Anthony Trenga, U.S. District Judge in Alexandria, VA, stated that influencers presented a plausible case, alleging Capital One knew or should have been aware that the extension redirected their commissions by overriding tracking codes, such as cookies, which verify consumers had seen their content.
The lawsuit concerns affiliate marketing, a system in which creators promote content on their platforms and social media channels in exchange for commission-based earnings from online retailers and third-party marketers.
According to the creators, the Capital One Shopping browser extension, which has more than 10 million users, is used to discover discounts. It erroneously reflected Capital One as the source of referral traffic at checkout, making it appear as if consumers had clicked the bank’s referral links before making purchases.
The creators alleged that this enabled Capital One to collect millions of dollars in commissions that rightfully belonged to bloggers, influencers, YouTubers and other content creators.
Judge Trenga ruled that the creators can proceed with their claims that Capital One was unjustly enriched, interfered with their contracts and earning potential, and violated the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. However, he dismissed a conversion claim along with four other state-level claims.
Capital One’s Response to Allegations
Capital One stated in a response, "Capital One Shopping does not replace affiliate marketer cookies or unlawfully take credit for commissions. We disagree with the allegations in the complaint and look forward to defending ourselves in court."
The bank requested dismissal, arguing that merchants determine how to distribute commissions. The bank also suggested the lawsuit reflected creators' frustration that merchants "do not always share their view that they did all the work."
Capital One has been dealing with regulatory issues recently. In May 2025, it agreed to pay $425 million to settle nationwide litigation that accused it of deceiving its online savings account customers to avoid paying millions of dollars in interest payments.
In March 2024, Reuters reported that a lawsuit filed against COF claiming that the company overcharged its credit and debit card customers on foreign currency-related transactions had been dismissed.
Capital One’s Price Performance & Zacks Rank
In the past six months, COF shares have risen 5.4% compared with the industry’s growth of 3.7%.
Regulatory Probes Faced by Other Financial Services Firms
Last month, UBS Group AG (UBS - Free Report) agreed to pay $511 million to resolve a tax probe by the U.S. Department of Justice against Credit Suisse for preparing false income tax returns and tax evasion. UBS Group AG acquired Credit Suisse in 2023.
UBS Group has agreed to the probe settlement as part of its inherited legal liabilities from Credit Suisse. The company will record the charge in its second-quarter 2025 results, while aiming to reduce the future legal cost reserves related to Credit Suisse.
Similarly, in April, a federal judge ordered Bank of America (BAC - Free Report) to pay $540.3 million in a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) lawsuit accusing the bank of paying less than what it owed for deposit insurance.
The FDIC sued Bank of America for $1.12 billion in 2017, accusing it of lowering its deposit insurance contributions by failing to honor a rule implemented in 2011 that changed how banks report risk exposure to counterparties.
See More Zacks Research for These Tickers
Normally $25 each - click below to receive one report FREE:
Image: Bigstock
COF to Face Lawsuit Over Alleged Theft of Influencer Commissions
Key Takeaways
Capital One (COF - Free Report) will have to face a lawsuit by social media creators who claim that the bank’s free browser extension deprived them of commissions on sales generated through their content.
Details of the Lawsuit Against Capital One
In a ruling issued Monday night, Anthony Trenga, U.S. District Judge in Alexandria, VA, stated that influencers presented a plausible case, alleging Capital One knew or should have been aware that the extension redirected their commissions by overriding tracking codes, such as cookies, which verify consumers had seen their content.
The lawsuit concerns affiliate marketing, a system in which creators promote content on their platforms and social media channels in exchange for commission-based earnings from online retailers and third-party marketers.
According to the creators, the Capital One Shopping browser extension, which has more than 10 million users, is used to discover discounts. It erroneously reflected Capital One as the source of referral traffic at checkout, making it appear as if consumers had clicked the bank’s referral links before making purchases.
The creators alleged that this enabled Capital One to collect millions of dollars in commissions that rightfully belonged to bloggers, influencers, YouTubers and other content creators.
Judge Trenga ruled that the creators can proceed with their claims that Capital One was unjustly enriched, interfered with their contracts and earning potential, and violated the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. However, he dismissed a conversion claim along with four other state-level claims.
Capital One’s Response to Allegations
Capital One stated in a response, "Capital One Shopping does not replace affiliate marketer cookies or unlawfully take credit for commissions. We disagree with the allegations in the complaint and look forward to defending ourselves in court."
The bank requested dismissal, arguing that merchants determine how to distribute commissions.
The bank also suggested the lawsuit reflected creators' frustration that merchants "do not always share their view that they did all the work."
Capital One has been dealing with regulatory issues recently. In May 2025, it agreed to pay $425 million to settle nationwide litigation that accused it of deceiving its online savings account customers to avoid paying millions of dollars in interest payments.
In March 2024, Reuters reported that a lawsuit filed against COF claiming that the company overcharged its credit and debit card customers on foreign currency-related transactions had been dismissed.
Capital One’s Price Performance & Zacks Rank
In the past six months, COF shares have risen 5.4% compared with the industry’s growth of 3.7%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Currently, Capital One carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Regulatory Probes Faced by Other Financial Services Firms
Last month, UBS Group AG (UBS - Free Report) agreed to pay $511 million to resolve a tax probe by the U.S. Department of Justice against Credit Suisse for preparing false income tax returns and tax evasion. UBS Group AG acquired Credit Suisse in 2023.
UBS Group has agreed to the probe settlement as part of its inherited legal liabilities from Credit Suisse. The company will record the charge in its second-quarter 2025 results, while aiming to reduce the future legal cost reserves related to Credit Suisse.
Similarly, in April, a federal judge ordered Bank of America (BAC - Free Report) to pay $540.3 million in a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) lawsuit accusing the bank of paying less than what it owed for deposit insurance.
The FDIC sued Bank of America for $1.12 billion in 2017, accusing it of lowering its deposit insurance contributions by failing to honor a rule implemented in 2011 that changed how banks report risk exposure to counterparties.