We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
ZIM vs. FRO: Which Shipping Company is a Stronger Play Now?
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
ZIM's asset-light model and focus on high-margin routes support pricing power and profitability.
FRO faces pressure from high debt, geopolitical risks, and weakening earnings estimate trends.
ZIM trades at a 0.31 forward sales multiple and has a Value Score of A, versus FRO's C.
ZIM Integrated Shipping (ZIM - Free Report) and Frontline Plc (FRO - Free Report) are two well-known names in the Zacks Transportation - Shipping industry. While ZIM is based in Israel, FRO is headquartered in Cyprus. ZIM is a leading container liner shipping company with a presence in more than 100 countries. The company serves approximately 33,000 customers in over 330 ports worldwide. Frontline focuses on the seaborne transportation of crude oil and refined products.
Given this backdrop, let’s take a closer look at which shipping company currently holds the edge, and more importantly, which might be the smarter investment now.
The Case for ZIM
ZIM's asset-light model, which means that the focus is more on leasing rather than owning vessels. The company’s focus on niche markets and high-margin trade routes helps it avoid crowded, low-margin segments, thereby maintaining strong pricing power. This, too, aids profitability. The shipping company’s operational efficiency is being aided by investments in digitalization and innovative technologies.
ZIM’s shareholder-friendly approach throws light on its financial prosperity. The shipping company’s high dividend yield is a huge positive for income-seeking investors. This highlights confidence in its cash flow and prospects. In the December quarter, ZIM’s board declared a regular dividend of approximately $382 million or $3.17 per ordinary share, together with the dividends shelled out in 2024. In the first quarter of 2025, ZIM’s board of directors declared a regular cash dividend of approximately $89 million, or 74 cents per share, reflecting approximately 30% of the quarter’s net income.
ZIM has an excellent track record with respect to earnings surprise, having beaten the Zacks Consensus Estimate in each of the past four quarters, showing resilience despite tough conditions. The average beat is 34.5%.
Due to the above-mentioned tailwinds and signs of easing trade tensions, the second-quarter 2025, third-quarter 2025, and full-year 2025 earnings estimates have been moving northward for ZIM.
Earnings Estimates for ZIM
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Case for FRO
Frontline, which focuses on the seaborne transportation of crude oil and oil products worldwide, is being well-served by its fleet expansion initiatives. FRO’s portfolio is one of the youngest among the tanker operators. The average fleet age is only 6.8 years.
Frontline’s shareholder-friendly attitude is also praiseworthy. The recent air strikes against Iran have lifted freight rates, aiding tanker stocks like FRO. Environmental regulations and shifting global trade patterns, including protectionist policies and sanctions, are, however, hurting Frontline.
Geopolitical tensions could disrupt tanker routes, hurting FRO in turn. Supply-chain disruptions and escalated voyage operating costs are also hurting the company’s bottom-line performance. Mainly due to the geopolitical woes, uncertainty regarding freight rates, and weakening demand from China, the second-quarter 2025, third-quarter 2025, and full-year 2025 earnings estimates have been moving southward for FRO.
Earnings Estimates for FRO
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Unlike ZIM, FRO doesn’t have an impressive earnings surprise history. The shipping company has lagged the Zacks Consensus Estimate twice in the last four quarters and met the consensus mark on the other occasions. The average miss is 4.4%.
Frontline’s high debt burden, primarily due to the elevated capital expenditures on fleet renewal, is also a worry. FRO’s high debt-to-equity ratio indicates that the financing of fleet upgrades is mainly carried out with borrowed funds.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
FRO Appears to be Pricier Than ZIM
ZIM is trading at a forward sales multiple of 0.31 and has a Value Score of A. Meanwhile, FRO has a Value Score of C, with its forward sales multiple at 3.06.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Conclusion
The shipping industry is responsible for transporting goods involved in world trade. The slowdown in trade may disrupt trade routes, bringing down goods transportation, in turn hurting the industry players. Consequently, tariff-related concerns are present for both ZIM and FRO. However, ZIM has an advantage, courtesy of its business model, by virtue of which it can shift capacity to more profitable routes if trade lanes are hit by tariffs.
Apart from the geopolitical risks, FRO’s high debt burden is a concern. The high capital expenditure requirement dents cash flow. FRO’s unfavorable valuation picture is a major deterrent.
Moreover, with spot rates and contracted rates remaining elevated, ZIM is likely to perform well in 2025 despite the tariff-induced uncertainties. Given its better prospects driven by its business model to withstand uncertainties, ZIM seems a better pick than FRO now.
While ZIM carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), FRO currently has a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell).
Image: Bigstock
ZIM vs. FRO: Which Shipping Company is a Stronger Play Now?
Key Takeaways
ZIM Integrated Shipping (ZIM - Free Report) and Frontline Plc (FRO - Free Report) are two well-known names in the Zacks Transportation - Shipping industry. While ZIM is based in Israel, FRO is headquartered in Cyprus. ZIM is a leading container liner shipping company with a presence in more than 100 countries. The company serves approximately 33,000 customers in over 330 ports worldwide. Frontline focuses on the seaborne transportation of crude oil and refined products.
Given this backdrop, let’s take a closer look at which shipping company currently holds the edge, and more importantly, which might be the smarter investment now.
The Case for ZIM
ZIM's asset-light model, which means that the focus is more on leasing rather than owning vessels. The company’s focus on niche markets and high-margin trade routes helps it avoid crowded, low-margin segments, thereby maintaining strong pricing power. This, too, aids profitability. The shipping company’s operational efficiency is being aided by investments in digitalization and innovative technologies.
ZIM’s shareholder-friendly approach throws light on its financial prosperity. The shipping company’s high dividend yield is a huge positive for income-seeking investors. This highlights confidence in its cash flow and prospects. In the December quarter, ZIM’s board declared a regular dividend of approximately $382 million or $3.17 per ordinary share, together with the dividends shelled out in 2024. In the first quarter of 2025, ZIM’s board of directors declared a regular cash dividend of approximately $89 million, or 74 cents per share, reflecting approximately 30% of the quarter’s net income.
ZIM has an excellent track record with respect to earnings surprise, having beaten the Zacks Consensus Estimate in each of the past four quarters, showing resilience despite tough conditions. The average beat is 34.5%.
ZIM Price and EPS Surprise
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services price-eps-surprise | ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Quote
Due to the above-mentioned tailwinds and signs of easing trade tensions, the second-quarter 2025, third-quarter 2025, and full-year 2025 earnings estimates have been moving northward for ZIM.
Earnings Estimates for ZIM
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Case for FRO
Frontline, which focuses on the seaborne transportation of crude oil and oil products worldwide, is being well-served by its fleet expansion initiatives. FRO’s portfolio is one of the youngest among the tanker operators. The average fleet age is only 6.8 years.
Frontline’s shareholder-friendly attitude is also praiseworthy. The recent air strikes against Iran have lifted freight rates, aiding tanker stocks like FRO. Environmental regulations and shifting global trade patterns, including protectionist policies and sanctions, are, however, hurting Frontline.
Geopolitical tensions could disrupt tanker routes, hurting FRO in turn. Supply-chain disruptions and escalated voyage operating costs are also hurting the company’s bottom-line performance. Mainly due to the geopolitical woes, uncertainty regarding freight rates, and weakening demand from China, the second-quarter 2025, third-quarter 2025, and full-year 2025 earnings estimates have been moving southward for FRO.
Earnings Estimates for FRO
Unlike ZIM, FRO doesn’t have an impressive earnings surprise history. The shipping company has lagged the Zacks Consensus Estimate twice in the last four quarters and met the consensus mark on the other occasions. The average miss is 4.4%.
Frontline Price and EPS Surprise
Frontline PLC price-eps-surprise | Frontline PLC Quote
Frontline’s high debt burden, primarily due to the elevated capital expenditures on fleet renewal, is also a worry. FRO’s high debt-to-equity ratio indicates that the financing of fleet upgrades is mainly carried out with borrowed funds.
FRO Appears to be Pricier Than ZIM
ZIM is trading at a forward sales multiple of 0.31 and has a Value Score of A. Meanwhile, FRO has a Value Score of C, with its forward sales multiple at 3.06.
Conclusion
The shipping industry is responsible for transporting goods involved in world trade. The slowdown in trade may disrupt trade routes, bringing down goods transportation, in turn hurting the industry players. Consequently, tariff-related concerns are present for both ZIM and FRO. However, ZIM has an advantage, courtesy of its business model, by virtue of which it can shift capacity to more profitable routes if trade lanes are hit by tariffs.
Apart from the geopolitical risks, FRO’s high debt burden is a concern. The high capital expenditure requirement dents cash flow. FRO’s unfavorable valuation picture is a major deterrent.
Moreover, with spot rates and contracted rates remaining elevated, ZIM is likely to perform well in 2025 despite the tariff-induced uncertainties. Given its better prospects driven by its business model to withstand uncertainties, ZIM seems a better pick than FRO now.
While ZIM carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), FRO currently has a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell).
You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here