We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
GS Q2 net revenues rose 15% y/y to $14.6B, beating estimates by 8.1% on strong IB and trading performance.
Investment banking fees grew 26.6% to $2.19B, led by a 71% spike in advisory revenues.
Financing revenues hit record highs and equities trading jumped 36% amid market turmoil.
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS - Free Report) share rose nearly 1% during yesterday’s trading session as second-quarter 2025 adjusted earnings per share of $10.91 topped the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 15.7% and jumped 26.6% from the year-ago quarter.
GS net revenues increased 15% to $14.6 billion for the quarter from the year-ago quarter. Also, the top line surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 8.1%.
The primary reason for Goldman’s better-than-expected performance was solid investment banking (IB) business. Global mergers and acquisitions in the second quarter of 2025 were impressive than previously expected. Markets plunged at the start of the second quarter as Trump announced sweeping tariffs. However, deal-making activities resumed in the last month of the quarter. This benefited the company’s quarterly performance.
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise
Net revenues in the Global Banking & Markets division (which houses the IB business) were impressive in the second quarter of 2025. The segment witnessed a 24% year-over-year jump in revenues to $10.1 billion.
Specifically, advisory revenues rose a whopping 71% year over year to $1.2 billion. Revenues in Debt underwriting increased 1.5%, and net revenues in Equity underwriting grew nearly 1%. Hence, overall, IB fees rose 26.6% to $2.19 billion in the second quarter.
Likewise, JPMorgan’s (JPM - Free Report) total IB fees (in the Commercial & Investment Bank segment) were up 7% from the prior-year quarter to $2.51 billion in the second quarter of 2025. JPM’s advisory and debt underwriting fees rose 8% and 12% year over year, respectively. On the contrary, equity underwriting fees fell 6%.
In contrast, Morgan Stanley’s (MS - Free Report) IB business performance was subdued. Its total IB fees (in the Institutional Securities division) fell 5% year over year to $1.54 billion. MS’s fixed income underwriting fees decreased 21%, while equity underwriting income jumped 42% year over year.
Other Factors That Supported Goldman’s Q2 Earnings
GS’s trading business performance was robust in the second quarter of 2025, driven by massive market turmoil. Net revenues in Equities increased 36% year over year, whereas fixed income, currency and commodities (FICC) trading revenues rose 9% year over year. Financing revenues in both equities and FICC reached record highs.
However, net revenues in Asset & Wealth Management were down 3% year over year. Despite this, the company touched a record asset under supervision of $3.3 trillion in the second quarter.
Overall, the company’s non-interest revenues rose 7% year over year, while net interest income jumped 56%, as funding/deposit costs stabilized.
Goldman’s total operating expenses increased 8% year over year to $9.2 billion. The uptick was mainly due to higher compensation and benefits expenses, and higher transaction-based expenses.
Given robust top-line growth, Goldman’s net income improved 22% from the prior-year quarter to $3.7 billion. (See the Zacks Earnings Calendar to stay ahead of market-making news.)
Image: Bigstock
Goldman Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates on Solid IB Business, Shares Rise
Key Takeaways
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS - Free Report) share rose nearly 1% during yesterday’s trading session as second-quarter 2025 adjusted earnings per share of $10.91 topped the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 15.7% and jumped 26.6% from the year-ago quarter.
GS net revenues increased 15% to $14.6 billion for the quarter from the year-ago quarter. Also, the top line surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 8.1%.
The primary reason for Goldman’s better-than-expected performance was solid investment banking (IB) business. Global mergers and acquisitions in the second quarter of 2025 were impressive than previously expected. Markets plunged at the start of the second quarter as Trump announced sweeping tariffs. However, deal-making activities resumed in the last month of the quarter. This benefited the company’s quarterly performance.
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Quote
IB Majorly Supports GS’s Revenues
Net revenues in the Global Banking & Markets division (which houses the IB business) were impressive in the second quarter of 2025. The segment witnessed a 24% year-over-year jump in revenues to $10.1 billion.
Specifically, advisory revenues rose a whopping 71% year over year to $1.2 billion. Revenues in Debt underwriting increased 1.5%, and net revenues in Equity underwriting grew nearly 1%. Hence, overall, IB fees rose 26.6% to $2.19 billion in the second quarter.
Likewise, JPMorgan’s (JPM - Free Report) total IB fees (in the Commercial & Investment Bank segment) were up 7% from the prior-year quarter to $2.51 billion in the second quarter of 2025. JPM’s advisory and debt underwriting fees rose 8% and 12% year over year, respectively. On the contrary, equity underwriting fees fell 6%.
In contrast, Morgan Stanley’s (MS - Free Report) IB business performance was subdued. Its total IB fees (in the Institutional Securities division) fell 5% year over year to $1.54 billion. MS’s fixed income underwriting fees decreased 21%, while equity underwriting income jumped 42% year over year.
Other Factors That Supported Goldman’s Q2 Earnings
GS’s trading business performance was robust in the second quarter of 2025, driven by massive market turmoil. Net revenues in Equities increased 36% year over year, whereas fixed income, currency and commodities (FICC) trading revenues rose 9% year over year. Financing revenues in both equities and FICC reached record highs.
However, net revenues in Asset & Wealth Management were down 3% year over year. Despite this, the company touched a record asset under supervision of $3.3 trillion in the second quarter.
Overall, the company’s non-interest revenues rose 7% year over year, while net interest income jumped 56%, as funding/deposit costs stabilized.
Goldman’s total operating expenses increased 8% year over year to $9.2 billion. The uptick was mainly due to higher compensation and benefits expenses, and higher transaction-based expenses.
Given robust top-line growth, Goldman’s net income improved 22% from the prior-year quarter to $3.7 billion. (See the Zacks Earnings Calendar to stay ahead of market-making news.)
Currently, Goldman carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.