We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
EPD, KMI Showdown: Distribution Stability Stock or LNG Growth Play?
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
Kinder Morgan's LNG-linked projects and $9.3B backlog highlight growth potential.
Enterprise Products' $6B projects due by 2026 strengthen its cash flow outlook.
EPD's stronger balance sheet supports steady distributions, while KMI trades at a premium.
Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI - Free Report) and Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD - Free Report) are two leading midstream energy players, and hence, by virtue of their business model, are mostly insulated to extreme volatility in oil and natural gas prices. Over the past year, KMI has jumped 29.3%, outpacing EPD’s 16.4% gain. But, as we all know, that price movement is not the sole parameter in determining the investment objectives. Let’s examine the underlying fundamentals and the primary drivers of their business models.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Kinder Morgan
Mounting LNG Demand Brightens Long-Term Business Outlook
Kinder Morgan is well-positioned to benefit from the growing demand for natural gas, both in the United States and globally. Notably, LNG exports are increasing in the United States, and with KMI responsible for transporting roughly 40% of all the gas to the liquefaction terminals, the company’s outlook appears promising.
KMI expects LNG demand worldwide to double by the end of this decade. This further brightens its outlook, considering it has a massive network of existing natural gas pipelines which is strategically located along the U.S. Gulf Coast, where the concentration of LNG facilities is high.
Expanding Backlog: Powering the Electricity Boom
The leading midstream energy company experienced a surge in its project backlog during the June quarter of 2025. The backlog grew to $9.3 billion from $8.8 billion, reflecting strong demand for its services and thereby securing incremental fee-based revenues. Thus, KMI will likely generate more cash flows for its shareholders.
In the June quarter, Kinder Morgan took on $1.3 billion in new projects, which is quite encouraging. Key developments include the Trident Phase 2 project and the Louisiana Line Texas Access project, both of which are designed to transport natural gas from Texas to Louisiana, a vital region for LNG (liquefied natural gas) exports. Interestingly, with the rising demand for LNG export, both long-term projects are backed by solid customer commitments, further reassuring incremental and reliable cash flows.
Interestingly, almost half of the backlog’s projects are aided by increasing power demand. With the rising need for electricity from the booming data centers and the growth in population, natural gas transportation and storage have become paramount, thereby enhancing Kinder Morgan’s business outlook.
Enterprise Products Partners
Robust Project Backlog: In-Service by 2026
The partnership has $6 billion worth of key projects under construction, with the maximum in-service date by the end of 2026. These include new gas processing plants in the Permian Basin, a major NGL pipeline (Bahia) and expansions at export terminals. Once all the projects come online, it will generate additional cash flows for the unit holders.
Competitive Advantage in Retaining & Attracting Customers
Enterprise Products’ extensive network of midstream assets handles large volumes of processing and transportation. This includes processing approximately 7.8 billion cubic feet of natural gas daily and transporting more than 1 million barrels of refined products and petrochemicals per day.
The partnership benefits from a strong competitive edge, as its midstream network is linked to all U.S. ethylene plants and nearly 90% of refineries located east of the Rockies, enabling it to attract and retain customers more effectively.
EPD vs. KMI: Which is a Better Stock?
Investors should also recognize that Enterprise Products’ balance sheet is stronger. This is because it will take three years of earnings for EPD to pay off its debt load compared to roughly five years for KMI. For Enterprise Products, the total debt to EBITDA is 3.33x, while for Kinder Morgan, it is 4.89x.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Before concluding the investment analysis of both stocks, let’s have a quick look at the stocks’ fundamentals.
EPD: Steady Income & Investment Safety
Considering the extensive export network, comprising the Neches River terminal, which will be capable of loading up to 360,000 barrels of propane per day soon, Enterprise Products is well-positioned to deliver U.S. energy to global markets.
Along with this, the partnership’s project backlog, all of which will be online by next year-end, the midstream energy giant will continue to generate additional and steady cash flows for unit holders. Consequently, the incremental benefit for unitholders should be realized in the near term.
Also, the partnership, with a stronger balance sheet, will likely continue to generate a handsome distribution yield, which currently is at 6.88%.
Distribution Yield
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
KMI: Growth With Risk
Although Kinder Morgan has a lower dividend yield and more debt, its fate is strongly tied to the LNG boom and U.S. gas demand growth. Thus, the company has a bit more risk as future LNG growth is highly sensitive to uncertainties like global politics and new tariffs.
Valuations
While EPD is currently trading at a trailing 12-month enterprise value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) of 10.21x, KMI is trading at a trailing 12-month EV/EBITDA of 13.68x.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Investment Conclusions
Looking at the valuation, investors appear willing to pay a premium for KMI, likely accepting higher risks to capitalize on the LNG growth embedded in the midstream company’s business model. Those who are willing to have a steady and high income can keep an eye on EPD.
Most importantly, investors should not rush to bet on either stock, as both midstream players have significant ongoing and planned capital projects that could face delays or cost overruns. However, those who have already invested either in EPD or KMI should retain the stocks. Currently, both EPD and KMI carry a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
See More Zacks Research for These Tickers
Normally $25 each - click below to receive one report FREE:
Image: Bigstock
EPD, KMI Showdown: Distribution Stability Stock or LNG Growth Play?
Key Takeaways
Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI - Free Report) and Enterprise Products Partners LP (EPD - Free Report) are two leading midstream energy players, and hence, by virtue of their business model, are mostly insulated to extreme volatility in oil and natural gas prices. Over the past year, KMI has jumped 29.3%, outpacing EPD’s 16.4% gain. But, as we all know, that price movement is not the sole parameter in determining the investment objectives. Let’s examine the underlying fundamentals and the primary drivers of their business models.
Kinder Morgan
Mounting LNG Demand Brightens Long-Term Business Outlook
Kinder Morgan is well-positioned to benefit from the growing demand for natural gas, both in the United States and globally. Notably, LNG exports are increasing in the United States, and with KMI responsible for transporting roughly 40% of all the gas to the liquefaction terminals, the company’s outlook appears promising.
KMI expects LNG demand worldwide to double by the end of this decade. This further brightens its outlook, considering it has a massive network of existing natural gas pipelines which is strategically located along the U.S. Gulf Coast, where the concentration of LNG facilities is high.
Expanding Backlog: Powering the Electricity Boom
The leading midstream energy company experienced a surge in its project backlog during the June quarter of 2025. The backlog grew to $9.3 billion from $8.8 billion, reflecting strong demand for its services and thereby securing incremental fee-based revenues. Thus, KMI will likely generate more cash flows for its shareholders.
In the June quarter, Kinder Morgan took on $1.3 billion in new projects, which is quite encouraging. Key developments include the Trident Phase 2 project and the Louisiana Line Texas Access project, both of which are designed to transport natural gas from Texas to Louisiana, a vital region for LNG (liquefied natural gas) exports. Interestingly, with the rising demand for LNG export, both long-term projects are backed by solid customer commitments, further reassuring incremental and reliable cash flows.
Interestingly, almost half of the backlog’s projects are aided by increasing power demand. With the rising need for electricity from the booming data centers and the growth in population, natural gas transportation and storage have become paramount, thereby enhancing Kinder Morgan’s business outlook.
Enterprise Products Partners
Robust Project Backlog: In-Service by 2026
The partnership has $6 billion worth of key projects under construction, with the maximum in-service date by the end of 2026. These include new gas processing plants in the Permian Basin, a major NGL pipeline (Bahia) and expansions at export terminals. Once all the projects come online, it will generate additional cash flows for the unit holders.
Competitive Advantage in Retaining & Attracting Customers
Enterprise Products’ extensive network of midstream assets handles large volumes of processing and transportation. This includes processing approximately 7.8 billion cubic feet of natural gas daily and transporting more than 1 million barrels of refined products and petrochemicals per day.
The partnership benefits from a strong competitive edge, as its midstream network is linked to all U.S. ethylene plants and nearly 90% of refineries located east of the Rockies, enabling it to attract and retain customers more effectively.
EPD vs. KMI: Which is a Better Stock?
Investors should also recognize that Enterprise Products’ balance sheet is stronger. This is because it will take three years of earnings for EPD to pay off its debt load compared to roughly five years for KMI. For Enterprise Products, the total debt to EBITDA is 3.33x, while for Kinder Morgan, it is 4.89x.
Before concluding the investment analysis of both stocks, let’s have a quick look at the stocks’ fundamentals.
EPD: Steady Income & Investment Safety
Considering the extensive export network, comprising the Neches River terminal, which will be capable of loading up to 360,000 barrels of propane per day soon, Enterprise Products is well-positioned to deliver U.S. energy to global markets.
Along with this, the partnership’s project backlog, all of which will be online by next year-end, the midstream energy giant will continue to generate additional and steady cash flows for unit holders. Consequently, the incremental benefit for unitholders should be realized in the near term.
Also, the partnership, with a stronger balance sheet, will likely continue to generate a handsome distribution yield, which currently is at 6.88%.
Distribution Yield
KMI: Growth With Risk
Although Kinder Morgan has a lower dividend yield and more debt, its fate is strongly tied to the LNG boom and U.S. gas demand growth. Thus, the company has a bit more risk as future LNG growth is highly sensitive to uncertainties like global politics and new tariffs.
Valuations
While EPD is currently trading at a trailing 12-month enterprise value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) of 10.21x, KMI is trading at a trailing 12-month EV/EBITDA of 13.68x.
Investment Conclusions
Looking at the valuation, investors appear willing to pay a premium for KMI, likely accepting higher risks to capitalize on the LNG growth embedded in the midstream company’s business model. Those who are willing to have a steady and high income can keep an eye on EPD.
Most importantly, investors should not rush to bet on either stock, as both midstream players have significant ongoing and planned capital projects that could face delays or cost overruns. However, those who have already invested either in EPD or KMI should retain the stocks. Currently, both EPD and KMI carry a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.