We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
CVX or CNQ: Which Energy Giant Looks Stronger Right Now?
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
CNQ posts record output and resilient margins while CVX contends with weaker crude and operational pressures.
CVX faces declining liquid realizations, China demand uncertainty, and higher operating costs.
CNQ benefits from low-decline oil sands, lower costs, strong balance sheet, and rising EPS estimates.
Canadian Natural Resources Limited ((CNQ - Free Report) ) and Chevron Corporation ((CVX - Free Report) ) sit on opposite sides of North America, yet both are central players in global oil markets. They share a common identity as large, diversified producers with meaningful exposure to long-lived assets, heavy oil, and large-scale upstream developments. With oil prices under pressure and capital allocation under tighter investor scrutiny, the comparison between the two has become especially relevant. Both companies are leaning on operational efficiency, disciplined spending, and strategic growth initiatives — but their risk profiles and earnings trajectories look very different.
CNQ is benefiting from robust production momentum, record volumes, and a well-insulated asset base. Chevron, meanwhile, is navigating a softer macro backdrop, valuation strain, and a long list of operational and market-driven pressures that continue to influence sentiment. Against this backdrop, investors are trying to understand which company offers the best balance of resilience and upside.
With that context in mind, let’s take a closer look at the fundamentals to determine which one may be a better investment candidate right now.
The Case for CVX Stock
Chevron brings scale, diversification and a high-quality portfolio, but its near-term setup is quite complicated. The biggest headwind stems from weakening commodity prices. Brent is projected to trade around $55 per barrel through 2026 due to oversupply and global demand uncertainty. Historically, Chevron’s profitability has dropped sharply when crude softens, and with oil prices already trending lower, its earnings remain exposed. As it is, the company posted 21.5% production growth in Q3, yet upstream earnings fell 28% year over year as liquid realizations declined.
Chevron’s demand exposure to China adds further uncertainty. Much of China’s recent intake has gone into strategic petroleum reserve storage rather than true consumption. With the country’s underlying demand weakening, any slowdown in its strategic buying could push Brent much lower, which would directly pressure CVX’s margins.
Operationally, the company faces additional hurdles. Tariffs and inflation pressures could lift operating costs. Downstream earnings remain vulnerable to California’s shifting regulatory landscape. Frontier exploration plans introduce capital-allocation risks. The Hess integration, while strategically compelling, comes with near-term transaction costs that already pulled down earnings. Fourth-quarter turnarounds will temporarily suppress production and downstream profits as well.
Chevron still generated strong cash flow — $9.9 billion in operating cash flow and $7 billion in adjusted free cash flow — in Q3. Production exceeded 4 million barrels of oil-equivalent per day (BOE/d). The Hess acquisition is progressing well and should deliver synergies in 2025.
The Case for CNQ Stock
CNQ is firing on all operational cylinders. The company posted a standout third quarter, with corporate production jumping 19% year over year to 1.62 million BOE/d, marking its second record quarter of the year. Liquids and gas volumes both reached all-time highs, supported not only by strong organic execution but also by accretive acquisitions across the Duvernay, Montney and Palliser regions. Lower heavy-oil operating costs — down 12% year over year — further bolstered margins. Management expects production-per-share to climb 16% in 2026, pointing to meaningful scale-driven cash flow growth.
The backbone of CNQ’s stability is its long-life, low-decline oil sands resource. With the second-largest reserves in the global energy sector, CNQ can operate with minimal sustaining capital compared with shale peers. The company’s full ownership of the Albian mining assets added 31,000 barrels per day of zero-decline bitumen, enhancing integration and creating room for further optimization. Third-quarter oil sands mining averaged 581,000 barrels per day of SCO at over 100% utilization, and unit operating costs were held to about $21. This depth of resources — backed by a 47-year reserve life index — anchors predictable cash flows well into future cycles.
Canadian Natural’s Financial strength adds another layer of support. A BBB+ credit rating, debt/EBITDA of 0.9X, ample liquidity above C$4.3 billion, and a conservative debt-to-capital ratio reinforce balance-sheet durability. CNQ’s 5% dividend yield is comfortably covered, and its 25-year streak of dividend increases underscores capital discipline.
That said, Canadian Natural is not immune to the broader macro backdrop. Volatile oil prices, environmental policy pressure, and pipeline constraints remain credible risks. Emission-related regulation could lift compliance costs, while commodity softness could temporarily limit buybacks and free-cash-flow upside. Still, CNQ’s low-decline structure and cost advantages give it an enviable margin cushion.
Price Performance
Canadian Natural is up more than 10% year to date, outpacing Chevron’s 6% gain. CNQ’s stronger operational momentum and less cyclical earnings base have offered a clearer support level.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Valuation Comparison
Chevron is currently valued at a forward P/E of 19.2X — about 60% higher than its five-year average — even though oil prices remain near multi-year lows. If crude weakens further, the stock could face a valuation pullback. In contrast, Canadian Natural Resources trades at a more reasonable 15.1X, giving it a valuation that better matches its growth outlook and position within the sector.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
EPS Estimate Revisions
Over the past month, Chevron’s EPS estimates for 2025 and 2026 have been revised downward.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
However, Canadian Natural’s estimates have moved higher, reinforcing the divergence in earnings visibility and momentum.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Conclusion
Both companies sit at important crossroads within the global energy market, but their trajectories diverge. Canadian Natural carries a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) due to its resilient low-decline assets, disciplined capital returns, cleaner valuation, and upward earnings revisions. Chevron holds a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) as margin pressure, valuation risk, and commodity exposure overshadow its operational strengths. While both remain influential in the sector, CNQ is clearly better positioned right now thanks to its stability, improving fundamentals, and more favorable risk-reward profile.
Image: Bigstock
CVX or CNQ: Which Energy Giant Looks Stronger Right Now?
Key Takeaways
Canadian Natural Resources Limited ((CNQ - Free Report) ) and Chevron Corporation ((CVX - Free Report) ) sit on opposite sides of North America, yet both are central players in global oil markets. They share a common identity as large, diversified producers with meaningful exposure to long-lived assets, heavy oil, and large-scale upstream developments. With oil prices under pressure and capital allocation under tighter investor scrutiny, the comparison between the two has become especially relevant. Both companies are leaning on operational efficiency, disciplined spending, and strategic growth initiatives — but their risk profiles and earnings trajectories look very different.
CNQ is benefiting from robust production momentum, record volumes, and a well-insulated asset base. Chevron, meanwhile, is navigating a softer macro backdrop, valuation strain, and a long list of operational and market-driven pressures that continue to influence sentiment. Against this backdrop, investors are trying to understand which company offers the best balance of resilience and upside.
With that context in mind, let’s take a closer look at the fundamentals to determine which one may be a better investment candidate right now.
The Case for CVX Stock
Chevron brings scale, diversification and a high-quality portfolio, but its near-term setup is quite complicated. The biggest headwind stems from weakening commodity prices. Brent is projected to trade around $55 per barrel through 2026 due to oversupply and global demand uncertainty. Historically, Chevron’s profitability has dropped sharply when crude softens, and with oil prices already trending lower, its earnings remain exposed. As it is, the company posted 21.5% production growth in Q3, yet upstream earnings fell 28% year over year as liquid realizations declined.
Chevron’s demand exposure to China adds further uncertainty. Much of China’s recent intake has gone into strategic petroleum reserve storage rather than true consumption. With the country’s underlying demand weakening, any slowdown in its strategic buying could push Brent much lower, which would directly pressure CVX’s margins.
Operationally, the company faces additional hurdles. Tariffs and inflation pressures could lift operating costs. Downstream earnings remain vulnerable to California’s shifting regulatory landscape. Frontier exploration plans introduce capital-allocation risks. The Hess integration, while strategically compelling, comes with near-term transaction costs that already pulled down earnings. Fourth-quarter turnarounds will temporarily suppress production and downstream profits as well.
Chevron still generated strong cash flow — $9.9 billion in operating cash flow and $7 billion in adjusted free cash flow — in Q3. Production exceeded 4 million barrels of oil-equivalent per day (BOE/d). The Hess acquisition is progressing well and should deliver synergies in 2025.
The Case for CNQ Stock
CNQ is firing on all operational cylinders. The company posted a standout third quarter, with corporate production jumping 19% year over year to 1.62 million BOE/d, marking its second record quarter of the year. Liquids and gas volumes both reached all-time highs, supported not only by strong organic execution but also by accretive acquisitions across the Duvernay, Montney and Palliser regions. Lower heavy-oil operating costs — down 12% year over year — further bolstered margins. Management expects production-per-share to climb 16% in 2026, pointing to meaningful scale-driven cash flow growth.
The backbone of CNQ’s stability is its long-life, low-decline oil sands resource. With the second-largest reserves in the global energy sector, CNQ can operate with minimal sustaining capital compared with shale peers. The company’s full ownership of the Albian mining assets added 31,000 barrels per day of zero-decline bitumen, enhancing integration and creating room for further optimization. Third-quarter oil sands mining averaged 581,000 barrels per day of SCO at over 100% utilization, and unit operating costs were held to about $21. This depth of resources — backed by a 47-year reserve life index — anchors predictable cash flows well into future cycles.
Canadian Natural’s Financial strength adds another layer of support. A BBB+ credit rating, debt/EBITDA of 0.9X, ample liquidity above C$4.3 billion, and a conservative debt-to-capital ratio reinforce balance-sheet durability. CNQ’s 5% dividend yield is comfortably covered, and its 25-year streak of dividend increases underscores capital discipline.
That said, Canadian Natural is not immune to the broader macro backdrop. Volatile oil prices, environmental policy pressure, and pipeline constraints remain credible risks. Emission-related regulation could lift compliance costs, while commodity softness could temporarily limit buybacks and free-cash-flow upside. Still, CNQ’s low-decline structure and cost advantages give it an enviable margin cushion.
Price Performance
Canadian Natural is up more than 10% year to date, outpacing Chevron’s 6% gain. CNQ’s stronger operational momentum and less cyclical earnings base have offered a clearer support level.
Valuation Comparison
Chevron is currently valued at a forward P/E of 19.2X — about 60% higher than its five-year average — even though oil prices remain near multi-year lows. If crude weakens further, the stock could face a valuation pullback. In contrast, Canadian Natural Resources trades at a more reasonable 15.1X, giving it a valuation that better matches its growth outlook and position within the sector.
EPS Estimate Revisions
Over the past month, Chevron’s EPS estimates for 2025 and 2026 have been revised downward.
However, Canadian Natural’s estimates have moved higher, reinforcing the divergence in earnings visibility and momentum.
Conclusion
Both companies sit at important crossroads within the global energy market, but their trajectories diverge. Canadian Natural carries a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) due to its resilient low-decline assets, disciplined capital returns, cleaner valuation, and upward earnings revisions. Chevron holds a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) as margin pressure, valuation risk, and commodity exposure overshadow its operational strengths. While both remain influential in the sector, CNQ is clearly better positioned right now thanks to its stability, improving fundamentals, and more favorable risk-reward profile.
You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.