We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Procter & Gamble vs. Church & Dwight: Which Household Stock Outshines?
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
PG posts steady organic sales growth as eight of its 10 daily-use categories hold or expand.
CHD delivers 5% net sales growth with strong gains from THERABREATH, HERO and ARM & HAMMER.
CHD and PG trade below historical P/E medians after year-to-date share price declines.
In the world of household and personal care, two giants stand on opposite ends of a competitive battlefield — The Procter & Gamble Company (PG - Free Report) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD - Free Report) . PG is the category-defining titan with a century-plus legacy of shaping consumer habits, while CHD is the lean, value-driven challenger quietly expanding its footprint one aisle at a time. As shifting consumer preferences, pricing power and retailer dynamics reshape the broader CPG landscape, the rivalry between these two companies has never been more compelling.
At its core, this face-off focuses on the contrasts: PG, armed with blockbuster brands and a dominant market share across multiple categories, leverages scale and global reach to defend its leadership position. CHD, meanwhile, thrives on a focused portfolio, asset-light agility and disciplined execution that enable it to punch well above its weight. With each fighting to preserve and grow their slice of the market, their strategies offer a fascinating look into how business models, brand equity and competitive positioning ultimately determine who wins in the modern consumer marketplace.
The Case for PG
Procter & Gamble’s investment case is underpinned by its scale advantages, category breadth and the durability of its global brand ecosystem. The company delivered its 40th consecutive quarter of organic sales growth, with first-quarter fiscal 2026 revenues rising nearly 3% to $22.39 billion, reinforcing PG’s standing as one of the most dominant players in the consumer products industry.
The company’s portfolio spans 10 strategically selected daily-use categories, eight of which grew or maintained organic sales in the quarter, reflecting the continued strength of flagship brands including Tide, Pampers, Olay, SK-II, Vicks and Gillette. While aggregate global market share declined 30 basis points (bps), PG maintains leadership across major geographies, supported by a well-structured price ladder that effectively serves premium, mid-tier and value-oriented consumers.
Execution remains a central driver of PG’s long-term value proposition. Management is intensifying its integrated superiority strategy, focusing on product performance, innovation, communication, retail execution and packaging enhancements. Initiatives such as the most significant Tide liquid upgrade in two decades, the expansion of Tide evo’s sustainable, plastic-free format, and a multi-tier restage of the Pampers franchise demonstrate PG’s commitment to category-led growth.
The company’s digital evolution, anchored by Supply Chain 3.0, automation and streamlined, data-enabled brand teams, further enhances operational agility and reinforces PG’s competitive position in an increasingly digital-first retail environment.
PG continues to deliver stable, disciplined performance, with core EPS rising 3% and free cash flow productivity reaching 102%. PG expects to return roughly $15 billion to shareholders in fiscal 2026. Although tariff-related costs of approximately $500 million remain a headwind, recent material exclusions and easing retaliatory tariffs have mitigated some pressure, enabling PG to preserve investment in innovation and competitiveness. Together, these elements support a durable long-term outlook grounded in category leadership, financial strength and consistent global demand.
The Case for CHD
Church & Dwight’s investment appeal lies in its steady market-share expansion, balanced portfolio and resilient execution in a challenging consumer environment. In third-quarter 2025, the company delivered 5% net sales growth, with organic sales up 3.4%, driven primarily by 4% volume growth. CHD continues to gain both dollar and volume share across most major brands, led by THERABREATH, HERO, ARM & HAMMER, BATISTE and TROJAN, while maintaining strong international momentum with 7.7% organic growth in its global business.
Though smaller than mega-cap peers, CHD commands an outsized presence in value-led categories, supported by a portfolio that balances household staples and fast-growing personal care brands. With e-commerce now representing 23% of global consumer sales, up from 21% last year, the company is widening its reach among younger, digitally native shoppers seeking performance at accessible price points.
CHD’s brand-building and innovation engine remain central to its competitiveness. The company increased marketing investment by 50 bps to 12.8% of sales to fuel category growth and support recent product expansions, including new THERABREATH toothpastes and TROJAN’s G.O.A.T. non-latex condom platform. The acquisition of TOUCHLAND, a high-growth premium hygiene brand, is already exceeding expectations and strengthens CHD’s access to younger, design-conscious consumers. At the same time, the company is pruning lower-return assets, exiting FLAWLESS, SPINBRUSH and WATERPIK showerheads, and conducting a strategic review of its vitamin business to reinforce a higher-margin, more focused portfolio.
Financially, CHD delivered adjusted EPS growth of 2.5% in the third quarter and strong 19.6% cash flow growth. It also raised its full-year operating cash outlook to $1.2 billion. While tariff-related costs remain a drag, the company has reduced its expected 2025 tariff impact to $25 million from $60 million through targeted pricing and supply-chain mitigation initiatives, easing gross-margin pressure. This combination of disciplined execution, consistent share gains and robust cash generation underscores a durable long-term investment case for Church & Dwight.
How Do Estimates Compare for PG & CHD?
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Procter & Gamble’s fiscal 2026 sales and EPS implies year-over-year growth of 3.2% and 2.6%, respectively. EPS estimates for fiscal 2026 have moved up 0.3% in the past 30 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Church & Dwight’s 2025 sales and EPS suggests year-over-year growth of 1.6% and 1.2%, respectively. EPS estimates for 2025 have moved up 0.6% in the past 30 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Price Performance & Valuation of PG and CHD
Year to date, Procter & Gamble stock has lost 11.4% and Church & Dwight stock has declined 19.6%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Procter & Gamble is trading at a forward 12-month price-to-earnings multiple of 20.7, below its median of 23.49 in the last five years. Church & Dwight’s forward 12-month P/E multiple sits at 22.38, below its median of 27.93 in the last five years. Church & Dwight continues to command a premium valuation compared with Procter & Gamble, reflecting its consistent share gains, resilient niche positioning and higher long-term growth profile.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Both PG and CHD have faced share price pressure this year, reflecting broader challenges in the consumer staples sector. However, each is now trading at a discount to its historical valuation levels, suggesting a more attractive entry point for long-term investors.
Despite its smaller scale, CHD carries a premium valuation versus PG, an acknowledgment of the company’s steady market-share growth, diversified value-oriented portfolio and strong cash-flow momentum.
Conclusion
Both PG & CHD stocks have struggled to find momentum this year, weighed down by shifting consumer trends, cost pressure and a broader rotation away from defensive names. Yet the degree of weakness has not been equal. CHD’s slide has been noticeably steeper, reflecting its higher sensitivity to category volatility and its premium valuation relative to peers. PG, while also under pressure, has demonstrated steadier performance, supported by the depth of its global brands, mature category leadership and a broader consumer reach.
Looking ahead, the decision between the two comes down to investor preference. Procter & Gamble offers stability, scale and a valuation discount relative to CHD, an appealing combination for those seeking defensive strength with long-term cash-flow reliability. Church & Dwight, by contrast, remains positioned as the higher-growth, higher-multiple contender whose future upside depends on continued share gains and disciplined portfolio sharpening. Both have credible long-term narratives, but they cater to distinctly different risk appetites.
Image: Bigstock
Procter & Gamble vs. Church & Dwight: Which Household Stock Outshines?
Key Takeaways
In the world of household and personal care, two giants stand on opposite ends of a competitive battlefield — The Procter & Gamble Company (PG - Free Report) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD - Free Report) . PG is the category-defining titan with a century-plus legacy of shaping consumer habits, while CHD is the lean, value-driven challenger quietly expanding its footprint one aisle at a time. As shifting consumer preferences, pricing power and retailer dynamics reshape the broader CPG landscape, the rivalry between these two companies has never been more compelling.
At its core, this face-off focuses on the contrasts: PG, armed with blockbuster brands and a dominant market share across multiple categories, leverages scale and global reach to defend its leadership position. CHD, meanwhile, thrives on a focused portfolio, asset-light agility and disciplined execution that enable it to punch well above its weight. With each fighting to preserve and grow their slice of the market, their strategies offer a fascinating look into how business models, brand equity and competitive positioning ultimately determine who wins in the modern consumer marketplace.
The Case for PG
Procter & Gamble’s investment case is underpinned by its scale advantages, category breadth and the durability of its global brand ecosystem. The company delivered its 40th consecutive quarter of organic sales growth, with first-quarter fiscal 2026 revenues rising nearly 3% to $22.39 billion, reinforcing PG’s standing as one of the most dominant players in the consumer products industry.
The company’s portfolio spans 10 strategically selected daily-use categories, eight of which grew or maintained organic sales in the quarter, reflecting the continued strength of flagship brands including Tide, Pampers, Olay, SK-II, Vicks and Gillette. While aggregate global market share declined 30 basis points (bps), PG maintains leadership across major geographies, supported by a well-structured price ladder that effectively serves premium, mid-tier and value-oriented consumers.
Execution remains a central driver of PG’s long-term value proposition. Management is intensifying its integrated superiority strategy, focusing on product performance, innovation, communication, retail execution and packaging enhancements. Initiatives such as the most significant Tide liquid upgrade in two decades, the expansion of Tide evo’s sustainable, plastic-free format, and a multi-tier restage of the Pampers franchise demonstrate PG’s commitment to category-led growth.
The company’s digital evolution, anchored by Supply Chain 3.0, automation and streamlined, data-enabled brand teams, further enhances operational agility and reinforces PG’s competitive position in an increasingly digital-first retail environment.
PG continues to deliver stable, disciplined performance, with core EPS rising 3% and free cash flow productivity reaching 102%. PG expects to return roughly $15 billion to shareholders in fiscal 2026. Although tariff-related costs of approximately $500 million remain a headwind, recent material exclusions and easing retaliatory tariffs have mitigated some pressure, enabling PG to preserve investment in innovation and competitiveness. Together, these elements support a durable long-term outlook grounded in category leadership, financial strength and consistent global demand.
The Case for CHD
Church & Dwight’s investment appeal lies in its steady market-share expansion, balanced portfolio and resilient execution in a challenging consumer environment. In third-quarter 2025, the company delivered 5% net sales growth, with organic sales up 3.4%, driven primarily by 4% volume growth. CHD continues to gain both dollar and volume share across most major brands, led by THERABREATH, HERO, ARM & HAMMER, BATISTE and TROJAN, while maintaining strong international momentum with 7.7% organic growth in its global business.
Though smaller than mega-cap peers, CHD commands an outsized presence in value-led categories, supported by a portfolio that balances household staples and fast-growing personal care brands. With e-commerce now representing 23% of global consumer sales, up from 21% last year, the company is widening its reach among younger, digitally native shoppers seeking performance at accessible price points.
CHD’s brand-building and innovation engine remain central to its competitiveness. The company increased marketing investment by 50 bps to 12.8% of sales to fuel category growth and support recent product expansions, including new THERABREATH toothpastes and TROJAN’s G.O.A.T. non-latex condom platform. The acquisition of TOUCHLAND, a high-growth premium hygiene brand, is already exceeding expectations and strengthens CHD’s access to younger, design-conscious consumers. At the same time, the company is pruning lower-return assets, exiting FLAWLESS, SPINBRUSH and WATERPIK showerheads, and conducting a strategic review of its vitamin business to reinforce a higher-margin, more focused portfolio.
Financially, CHD delivered adjusted EPS growth of 2.5% in the third quarter and strong 19.6% cash flow growth. It also raised its full-year operating cash outlook to $1.2 billion. While tariff-related costs remain a drag, the company has reduced its expected 2025 tariff impact to $25 million from $60 million through targeted pricing and supply-chain mitigation initiatives, easing gross-margin pressure. This combination of disciplined execution, consistent share gains and robust cash generation underscores a durable long-term investment case for Church & Dwight.
How Do Estimates Compare for PG & CHD?
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Procter & Gamble’s fiscal 2026 sales and EPS implies year-over-year growth of 3.2% and 2.6%, respectively. EPS estimates for fiscal 2026 have moved up 0.3% in the past 30 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Church & Dwight’s 2025 sales and EPS suggests year-over-year growth of 1.6% and 1.2%, respectively. EPS estimates for 2025 have moved up 0.6% in the past 30 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Price Performance & Valuation of PG and CHD
Year to date, Procter & Gamble stock has lost 11.4% and Church & Dwight stock has declined 19.6%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Procter & Gamble is trading at a forward 12-month price-to-earnings multiple of 20.7, below its median of 23.49 in the last five years. Church & Dwight’s forward 12-month P/E multiple sits at 22.38, below its median of 27.93 in the last five years. Church & Dwight continues to command a premium valuation compared with Procter & Gamble, reflecting its consistent share gains, resilient niche positioning and higher long-term growth profile.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Both PG and CHD have faced share price pressure this year, reflecting broader challenges in the consumer staples sector. However, each is now trading at a discount to its historical valuation levels, suggesting a more attractive entry point for long-term investors.
Despite its smaller scale, CHD carries a premium valuation versus PG, an acknowledgment of the company’s steady market-share growth, diversified value-oriented portfolio and strong cash-flow momentum.
Conclusion
Both PG & CHD stocks have struggled to find momentum this year, weighed down by shifting consumer trends, cost pressure and a broader rotation away from defensive names. Yet the degree of weakness has not been equal. CHD’s slide has been noticeably steeper, reflecting its higher sensitivity to category volatility and its premium valuation relative to peers. PG, while also under pressure, has demonstrated steadier performance, supported by the depth of its global brands, mature category leadership and a broader consumer reach.
Looking ahead, the decision between the two comes down to investor preference. Procter & Gamble offers stability, scale and a valuation discount relative to CHD, an appealing combination for those seeking defensive strength with long-term cash-flow reliability. Church & Dwight, by contrast, remains positioned as the higher-growth, higher-multiple contender whose future upside depends on continued share gains and disciplined portfolio sharpening. Both have credible long-term narratives, but they cater to distinctly different risk appetites.
Both Procter & Gamble and Church & Dwight currently carry a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.