We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Can lululemon Maintain Its Pricing Power in a Softer Spending Climate?
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
lululemon is navigating softer consumer demand as it tests pricing power in FY25.
U.S. pressure, higher markdowns and tariffs are weighing on margins while prices rise selectively.
Design cycles are accelerating with more newness to revive key franchises and support pricing.
lululemon athletica inc. (LULU - Free Report) enters the back half of fiscal 2025 navigating a far more cautious consumer backdrop, raising the question of whether its long-standing pricing power can withstand the ongoing softer spending environment. The company acknowledges that U.S. shoppers are becoming more selective, spending less on apparel and responding mainly to styles that feel truly new.
Management highlighted that while international regions remain strong, the U.S. business is facing pressure as key casual franchises like Scuba and Softstreme have grown stale, prompting higher markdowns and weighing on product margins.
To partially offset rising costs, including sharply higher tariffs and the loss of the de minimis exemption, lululemon is rolling out modest price increases on select styles. Early reads have been positive, though management noted that the brand is proceeding carefully, assessing elasticity item by item.
Pricing remains just one lever among several. The company is also leaning on vendor negotiations, supply-chain efficiencies and disciplined expense management. However, with tariffs expected to drive a 220-basis-point (bps) hit to the gross margin in fiscal 2025, and an even larger $320-million impact in fiscal 2026, the brand must balance margin protection with safeguarding long-term brand equity.
The ultimate test of pricing power may rest on how quickly lululemon revitalizes its assortment. Management is accelerating design cycles, increasing newness from 23% to 35% next spring, and chasing into winning styles faster thanks to tighter vendor alignment. The company believes that when innovation lands, guests are willing to pay for it, as seen in strong performance categories and positive response to offerings like Align No Line and Daydrift.
Whether this innovation engine can outpace macro softness and justify higher prices will determine how well lululemon defends its premium positioning in fiscal 2026 and beyond.
Is Pricing Power Fueling Gains for LULU’s Competitors: CROX & RL?
As lululemon navigates softer demand and rising costs, rivals Crocs Inc. (CROX - Free Report) and Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL - Free Report) are leaning on pricing power to protect margins and sustain momentum in an increasingly value-driven marketplace.
Crocs’ ability to hold pricing power is being tested as consumers grow more cautious, yet the company is navigating the softer spending backdrop with selective price increases and disciplined promotional pullbacks. Management emphasized that pricing is set based on brand strength and market dynamics, not simply to offset tariffs, while innovation across Clogs and Sandals supports higher ASPs and consumer engagement. These levers help Crocs protect margins despite meaningful tariff headwinds.
Ralph Lauren’s pricing power appears resilient even as consumers grow more cautious, supported by eight consecutive years of AUR gains and strong full-price sell-through across regions. Management highlighted that AUR growth continues to stem from brand elevation, reduced discounting and favorable mix, not just price hikes, allowing RL to maintain margin strength despite tariff pressures. With broad-based momentum and strong value perception, the company remains confident in sustaining pricing leverage even in a softer spending climate.
The Zacks Rundown for LULU
lululemon’s shares have gained 11.7% in the past three months against the industry’s decline of 1.1%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
From a valuation standpoint, LULU trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 14.04X, lower than the industry’s 16.22X.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for lululemon’s fiscal 2025 earnings implies a year-over-year decline of 11.8%, whereas the consensus mark for fiscal 2026 earnings suggests growth of 1.2%. Earnings estimates for fiscal 2025 and 2026 have been northbound in the past seven days. LULU currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
Image: Bigstock
Can lululemon Maintain Its Pricing Power in a Softer Spending Climate?
Key Takeaways
lululemon athletica inc. (LULU - Free Report) enters the back half of fiscal 2025 navigating a far more cautious consumer backdrop, raising the question of whether its long-standing pricing power can withstand the ongoing softer spending environment. The company acknowledges that U.S. shoppers are becoming more selective, spending less on apparel and responding mainly to styles that feel truly new.
Management highlighted that while international regions remain strong, the U.S. business is facing pressure as key casual franchises like Scuba and Softstreme have grown stale, prompting higher markdowns and weighing on product margins.
To partially offset rising costs, including sharply higher tariffs and the loss of the de minimis exemption, lululemon is rolling out modest price increases on select styles. Early reads have been positive, though management noted that the brand is proceeding carefully, assessing elasticity item by item.
Pricing remains just one lever among several. The company is also leaning on vendor negotiations, supply-chain efficiencies and disciplined expense management. However, with tariffs expected to drive a 220-basis-point (bps) hit to the gross margin in fiscal 2025, and an even larger $320-million impact in fiscal 2026, the brand must balance margin protection with safeguarding long-term brand equity.
The ultimate test of pricing power may rest on how quickly lululemon revitalizes its assortment. Management is accelerating design cycles, increasing newness from 23% to 35% next spring, and chasing into winning styles faster thanks to tighter vendor alignment. The company believes that when innovation lands, guests are willing to pay for it, as seen in strong performance categories and positive response to offerings like Align No Line and Daydrift.
Whether this innovation engine can outpace macro softness and justify higher prices will determine how well lululemon defends its premium positioning in fiscal 2026 and beyond.
Is Pricing Power Fueling Gains for LULU’s Competitors: CROX & RL?
As lululemon navigates softer demand and rising costs, rivals Crocs Inc. (CROX - Free Report) and Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL - Free Report) are leaning on pricing power to protect margins and sustain momentum in an increasingly value-driven marketplace.
Crocs’ ability to hold pricing power is being tested as consumers grow more cautious, yet the company is navigating the softer spending backdrop with selective price increases and disciplined promotional pullbacks. Management emphasized that pricing is set based on brand strength and market dynamics, not simply to offset tariffs, while innovation across Clogs and Sandals supports higher ASPs and consumer engagement. These levers help Crocs protect margins despite meaningful tariff headwinds.
Ralph Lauren’s pricing power appears resilient even as consumers grow more cautious, supported by eight consecutive years of AUR gains and strong full-price sell-through across regions. Management highlighted that AUR growth continues to stem from brand elevation, reduced discounting and favorable mix, not just price hikes, allowing RL to maintain margin strength despite tariff pressures. With broad-based momentum and strong value perception, the company remains confident in sustaining pricing leverage even in a softer spending climate.
The Zacks Rundown for LULU
lululemon’s shares have gained 11.7% in the past three months against the industry’s decline of 1.1%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
From a valuation standpoint, LULU trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 14.04X, lower than the industry’s 16.22X.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for lululemon’s fiscal 2025 earnings implies a year-over-year decline of 11.8%, whereas the consensus mark for fiscal 2026 earnings suggests growth of 1.2%. Earnings estimates for fiscal 2025 and 2026 have been northbound in the past seven days. LULU currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.