We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Constellium vs. Ryerson: Which Aluminum Stock Should You Bet On?
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
Constellium posted 28% revenue growth in Q4 2025, driven by strong packaging and aerospace demand.
Ryerson saw aluminum revenues rise 10.4%, but manufacturing weakness and pricing declines hurt performance.
Constellium's lower valuation and rising estimates contrast with RYZ's higher debt and cautious outlook.
Constellium SE (CSTM - Free Report) and Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYZ - Free Report) are two prominent players in the aluminum sector with global operations and diversified portfolios. With aluminum prices remaining high, driven by global economic uncertainties and trade tensions, comparing these two industry participants is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to the Zacks Metal Products - Distribution industry.
Aluminum has become an attractive investment over the past few years with growing popularity for lighter and energy-efficient electric vehicles, recycled aluminum and rechargeable batteries. Demand for the metal has grown significantly as industries proceed toward the goal of sustainability and efficiency. Driven by robust air travel activities, healthy production rate for aircraft has spurred demand for aluminum alloys for fuselages and wings.
Amid such a backdrop, let’s take a closer look at both the companies’ fundamentals, growth prospects and challenges to find out which one is a better investment today.
The Case for Constellium
Constellium is witnessing strong momentum in its Packaging & Automotive Rolled Products segment. Significant orders for packaging rolled products in North America and Europe, as well as automotive rolled products in North America, are driving the segment’s performance.
The segment’s shipments increased 11% year over year to 265,000 metric tons in fourth-quarter 2025, buoyed by a robust demand environment. Revenues from the segment increased 34% to $1.35 billion, supported by higher metal prices.
Also, strength in the Aerospace & Transportation segment holds positive for CSTM. Healthy orders for transportation, industry and defense rolled products are driving the segment’s performance. The segment’s shipments increased 21% year over year to 53,000 metric tons in the fourth quarter. Revenues from the segment increased 23% to $527 million, supported by higher shipments and metal prices.
Driven by strength across operating segments and higher metal prices, the company’s total revenues increased 28% to $2.2 billion compared with the prior-year quarter.
Constellium remains focused on rewarding its shareholders through share repurchases. For instance, the company generated a solid free cash flow of $110 million in fourth-quarter 2025 and returned approximately $40 million to shareholders through share repurchases. CSTM also focuses on cost-control measures and successfully lowered leverage to 2.5x at 2025-end.
The Case for Ryerson
Ryerson’s diversified business structure allows it to mitigate the weakness in one end market with strength across others. The company is benefiting from higher infrastructure spending, reshoring and increased fabrication outsourcing, as well as restructuring of the manufacturing supply chain. Also, its investments in the non-ferrous polishing, buffing and grinding processes are likely to enhance its competency in the long run.
The strongest driver of Ryerson’s business at the moment is strength in the aluminum product line. Shipments from the aluminum product line remained relatively stable year over year at 185,000 tons in 2025. Revenues from the product line increased 10.4% to $1,150 million, supported by higher metal prices.
In the year, shipments from both the carbon steel and stainless steel product lines increased year over year. However, revenues from these product lines declined 5% and 1.4%, respectively, due to a decline in average selling prices. Also, demand in the manufacturing sector is likely to remain muted in the near term, which might continue to affect its overall performance.
High debt levels have also been a concern for Ryerson. It exited 2025 with a long-term debt of $461.2 million. Its current liabilities were $668.1 million, higher than the cash equivalents of about $26.9 million. Also, interest expenses in 2025 remained high at $38.9 million and the metric is projected to be $12 million in first-quarter 2026.
How Does the Zacks Consensus Estimate Compare for CSTM & RYZ?
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for CSTM’s 2026 sales and EPS implies year-over-year growth of 15.6% and 6.8%, respectively. The company’s EPS estimates for 2026 have increased over the past 60 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The consensus estimate for RYZ’s 2026 sales and EPS implies year-over-year growth of 11.7% and 180.1%, respectively. The company’s EPS estimates for 2026 have been stable over the past 60 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Price Performance and Valuation of CSTM & RYZ
In the past six months, Constellium’s shares have surged 60.8%, while Ryerson stock has declined 6.6%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Constellium is trading at a forward 12-month price-to-earnings ratio of 11.59X compared with its median of 9.78X over the last three years. Ryerson’s forward earnings multiple sits at 13.12X above its median of 12.07X over the same time frame.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Final Take
Constellium’s strength in the packaging and aerospace segments, along with its growth investments and shareholder-friendly policies, bodes well for strong growth in the quarters ahead. Additionally, CSTM’s upward earnings estimates appear to be appealing and instill investor confidence.
In contrast, Ryerson’s strength in the aluminum product line has been diluted by the weakness in the manufacturing sector and high debt level. Also, RYZ’s expensive valuation warrants a cautious approach for existing investors.
Given these factors, CSTM seems a better pick for investors than RYZ currently. While CSTM sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), Ryerson currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
Zacks' 7 Best Strong Buy Stocks (New Research Report)
Valued at $99, click below to receive our just-released report
predicting the 7 stocks that will soar highest in the coming month.
View the Zacks #1 Rank List
Image: Bigstock
Constellium vs. Ryerson: Which Aluminum Stock Should You Bet On?
Key Takeaways
Constellium SE (CSTM - Free Report) and Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYZ - Free Report) are two prominent players in the aluminum sector with global operations and diversified portfolios. With aluminum prices remaining high, driven by global economic uncertainties and trade tensions, comparing these two industry participants is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to the Zacks Metal Products - Distribution industry.
Aluminum has become an attractive investment over the past few years with growing popularity for lighter and energy-efficient electric vehicles, recycled aluminum and rechargeable batteries. Demand for the metal has grown significantly as industries proceed toward the goal of sustainability and efficiency. Driven by robust air travel activities, healthy production rate for aircraft has spurred demand for aluminum alloys for fuselages and wings.
Amid such a backdrop, let’s take a closer look at both the companies’ fundamentals, growth prospects and challenges to find out which one is a better investment today.
The Case for Constellium
Constellium is witnessing strong momentum in its Packaging & Automotive Rolled Products segment. Significant orders for packaging rolled products in North America and Europe, as well as automotive rolled products in North America, are driving the segment’s performance.
The segment’s shipments increased 11% year over year to 265,000 metric tons in fourth-quarter 2025, buoyed by a robust demand environment. Revenues from the segment increased 34% to $1.35 billion, supported by higher metal prices.
Also, strength in the Aerospace & Transportation segment holds positive for CSTM. Healthy orders for transportation, industry and defense rolled products are driving the segment’s performance. The segment’s shipments increased 21% year over year to 53,000 metric tons in the fourth quarter. Revenues from the segment increased 23% to $527 million, supported by higher shipments and metal prices.
Driven by strength across operating segments and higher metal prices, the company’s total revenues increased 28% to $2.2 billion compared with the prior-year quarter.
Constellium remains focused on rewarding its shareholders through share repurchases. For instance, the company generated a solid free cash flow of $110 million in fourth-quarter 2025 and returned approximately $40 million to shareholders through share repurchases. CSTM also focuses on cost-control measures and successfully lowered leverage to 2.5x at 2025-end.
The Case for Ryerson
Ryerson’s diversified business structure allows it to mitigate the weakness in one end market with strength across others. The company is benefiting from higher infrastructure spending, reshoring and increased fabrication outsourcing, as well as restructuring of the manufacturing supply chain. Also, its investments in the non-ferrous polishing, buffing and grinding processes are likely to enhance its competency in the long run.
The strongest driver of Ryerson’s business at the moment is strength in the aluminum product line. Shipments from the aluminum product line remained relatively stable year over year at 185,000 tons in 2025. Revenues from the product line increased 10.4% to $1,150 million, supported by higher metal prices.
In the year, shipments from both the carbon steel and stainless steel product lines increased year over year. However, revenues from these product lines declined 5% and 1.4%, respectively, due to a decline in average selling prices. Also, demand in the manufacturing sector is likely to remain muted in the near term, which might continue to affect its overall performance.
High debt levels have also been a concern for Ryerson. It exited 2025 with a long-term debt of $461.2 million. Its current liabilities were $668.1 million, higher than the cash equivalents of about $26.9 million. Also, interest expenses in 2025 remained high at $38.9 million and the metric is projected to be $12 million in first-quarter 2026.
How Does the Zacks Consensus Estimate Compare for CSTM & RYZ?
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for CSTM’s 2026 sales and EPS implies year-over-year growth of 15.6% and 6.8%, respectively. The company’s EPS estimates for 2026 have increased over the past 60 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The consensus estimate for RYZ’s 2026 sales and EPS implies year-over-year growth of 11.7% and 180.1%, respectively. The company’s EPS estimates for 2026 have been stable over the past 60 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Price Performance and Valuation of CSTM & RYZ
In the past six months, Constellium’s shares have surged 60.8%, while Ryerson stock has declined 6.6%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Constellium is trading at a forward 12-month price-to-earnings ratio of 11.59X compared with its median of 9.78X over the last three years. Ryerson’s forward earnings multiple sits at 13.12X above its median of 12.07X over the same time frame.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Final Take
Constellium’s strength in the packaging and aerospace segments, along with its growth investments and shareholder-friendly policies, bodes well for strong growth in the quarters ahead. Additionally, CSTM’s upward earnings estimates appear to be appealing and instill investor confidence.
In contrast, Ryerson’s strength in the aluminum product line has been diluted by the weakness in the manufacturing sector and high debt level. Also, RYZ’s expensive valuation warrants a cautious approach for existing investors.
Given these factors, CSTM seems a better pick for investors than RYZ currently. While CSTM sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), Ryerson currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.