We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
What PJM's Decision Means for OKLO's Ohio Project Timeline
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
PJM removed Oklo's 750-MW Ohio project from its current grid-connection review over application issues.
Oklo says losing its current review position could delay the project at least 14 months and raise costs.
FERC could restore Oklo's place in PJM's process; otherwise, a later review cycle may add uncertainty.
Oklo Inc. (OKLO - Free Report) is facing a new hurdle for its planned Ohio energy project after PJM Interconnection, the regional organization that manages the power grid across parts of the eastern United States, removed the project from its current grid-connection review process. The 750-megawatt project combines 150 MW of advanced nuclear power, 300 MW of fuel cells and 300 MW of natural gas generation. PJM cited several shortcomings in OKLO’s application, including technical questions about how the project would perform during sudden grid-voltage problems.
The bigger concern for OKLO is not that the project will be canceled, but that it could face a lengthy delay. OKLO believes the issues raised by PJM can be fixed and has challenged how the grid operator handled the review. The company estimates that losing its current place in PJM’s study process could delay the project by at least 14 months and push up development costs. This matters because power projects generally must secure approval to connect to the regional electricity grid before commencing supply. OKLO had already been working on grid studies and transmission planning for its Ohio development.
For investors following advanced nuclear names such as NuScale Power (SMR - Free Report) and NANO Nuclear Energy (NNE - Free Report) , the dispute also highlights an important point: developing a reactor is only part of the challenge; projects must also secure timely access to the electricity grid.
What It Could Mean for SMR and NNE
Although NuScale Power and NANO Nuclear are not involved in this dispute, OKLO’s experience shows why grid access can become an important execution issue for emerging nuclear projects.
OKLO has asked FERC, or the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission — the federal agency that oversees interstate electricity markets and transmission — to restore the project to its original place in PJM’s review process. If that happens, the impact on the development schedule could be limited. If not, OKLO may have to enter a later review cycle, creating greater uncertainty around the Ohio project’s timing and costs. The dispute therefore puts the timing of OKLO’s Ohio project at risk until the grid-connection issue is resolved.
Investors watching NuScale Power and NANO Nuclear may therefore increasingly consider grid-connection progress alongside licensing, construction and other project milestones.
The Zacks Rundown on OKLO
Shares of OKLO have lost 43.5% so far this year, underperforming the industry's essentially flat performance.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
OKLO currently has an average brokerage recommendation of 1.96 on a scale of 1 to 5 (Strong Buy to Strong Sell), calculated based on the actual recommendations (Buy, Hold, Sell, etc.) made by 23 brokerage firms.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
See how the Zacks Consensus Estimate for OKLO’s earnings has been revised over the past month.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell).
View the Zacks #1 Rank List
Image: Bigstock
What PJM's Decision Means for OKLO's Ohio Project Timeline
Key Takeaways
Oklo Inc. (OKLO - Free Report) is facing a new hurdle for its planned Ohio energy project after PJM Interconnection, the regional organization that manages the power grid across parts of the eastern United States, removed the project from its current grid-connection review process. The 750-megawatt project combines 150 MW of advanced nuclear power, 300 MW of fuel cells and 300 MW of natural gas generation. PJM cited several shortcomings in OKLO’s application, including technical questions about how the project would perform during sudden grid-voltage problems.
The bigger concern for OKLO is not that the project will be canceled, but that it could face a lengthy delay. OKLO believes the issues raised by PJM can be fixed and has challenged how the grid operator handled the review. The company estimates that losing its current place in PJM’s study process could delay the project by at least 14 months and push up development costs. This matters because power projects generally must secure approval to connect to the regional electricity grid before commencing supply. OKLO had already been working on grid studies and transmission planning for its Ohio development.
For investors following advanced nuclear names such as NuScale Power (SMR - Free Report) and NANO Nuclear Energy (NNE - Free Report) , the dispute also highlights an important point: developing a reactor is only part of the challenge; projects must also secure timely access to the electricity grid.
What It Could Mean for SMR and NNE
Although NuScale Power and NANO Nuclear are not involved in this dispute, OKLO’s experience shows why grid access can become an important execution issue for emerging nuclear projects.
OKLO has asked FERC, or the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission — the federal agency that oversees interstate electricity markets and transmission — to restore the project to its original place in PJM’s review process. If that happens, the impact on the development schedule could be limited. If not, OKLO may have to enter a later review cycle, creating greater uncertainty around the Ohio project’s timing and costs. The dispute therefore puts the timing of OKLO’s Ohio project at risk until the grid-connection issue is resolved.
Investors watching NuScale Power and NANO Nuclear may therefore increasingly consider grid-connection progress alongside licensing, construction and other project milestones.
The Zacks Rundown on OKLO
Shares of OKLO have lost 43.5% so far this year, underperforming the industry's essentially flat performance.
OKLO currently has an average brokerage recommendation of 1.96 on a scale of 1 to 5 (Strong Buy to Strong Sell), calculated based on the actual recommendations (Buy, Hold, Sell, etc.) made by 23 brokerage firms.
See how the Zacks Consensus Estimate for OKLO’s earnings has been revised over the past month.
The stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell).
You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.