We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
SEZL vs. DAVE: Which Consumer Fintech Stock Is the Better Bet?
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
Sezzle is expanding beyond BNPL through subscriptions, SezzleCash, Sezzle Send and merchant additions.
Dave's growth is driven by ExtraCash, member gains, larger advances and improving funding flexibility.
Similar valuations put focus on growth quality, monetization durability, credit discipline and execution.
Sezzle Inc. (SEZL - Free Report) and Dave Inc. (DAVE - Free Report) are trying to solve a similar consumer problem: giving financially stretched users faster, simpler access to payments and short-term liquidity through digital platforms. Both are expanding beyond their original products, using underwriting technology to manage credit risk and leaning on engagement to lift revenue per customer. This common ground makes SEZL and DAVE suitable for a fintech face-off.
Their paths, however, are different. Sezzle began with buy-now, pay-later (BNPL) and is building a wider ecosystem around subscriptions, shopping, cash advances and money transfers. Dave is a neobank whose economics remain centered on ExtraCash, with its debit card, subscriptions and developing Flex product widening the relationship.
Sezzle is currently growing faster and has several products that can deepen user frequency, while Dave brings a larger member base, strong acquisition efficiency and improving funding flexibility. The comparison comes down to growth breadth, monetization durability, credit discipline and execution.
The Case for SEZL
Sezzle’s appeal starts with a business that is becoming recurring and engaged. Active subscribers reached 854,000 in the second quarter, up 76.4% from a year earlier, while quarterly purchase frequency climbed to a record 7.2 times. These trends suggest Sezzle is building habits, not simply processing occasional BNPL purchases.
The subscription model also gives Sezzle room to add services without relying only on merchant checkout volume. SezzleCash extends the relationship into short-term liquidity, while Sezzle Send moves the platform into peer-to-peer payments. Early SezzleCash usage was encouraging, and management’s guidance assumes little contribution from the newer products, leaving room for upside if adoption develops well. Sezzle’s August agreement with WebBank expanded its bank program to support SezzleCash and Sezzle Send, giving these newer products a clearer funding framework.
Merchant expansion supports the other side of the network. In September, Sezzle announced Gymshark, Debenhams Group and Follett Higher Education as checkout additions, extending its reach across fashion and campus retail. Compared with Dave, which remains more dependent on ExtraCash monetization, Sezzle has more routes to increase transactions and customer touchpoints.
The economics are also supporting investment. Revenues advanced 51.7% year over year, while adjusted EBITDA reached $58 million, and the adjusted EBITDA margin held at 38.8%. Sezzle’s net transaction margin was 63.5%, near the upper end of its stated target range, even as marketing spending increased sharply.
Execution and credit losses still deserve attention, especially as Sezzle expands beyond BNPL. Yet its combination of subscriber growth, higher purchase frequency, merchant additions and new financial products creates a broader growth runway. The upgraded 2026 outlook reinforces the case that growth and profitability can coexist for investors.
The Case for DAVE
Dave has plenty working in its favor, particularly customer acquisition and ExtraCash engagement. The company added 951,000 new members in the second quarter, up 32% year over year, while customer acquisition cost stayed at $19. Monthly transacting members rose 17% to 3.08 million, showing that acquisition is translating into activity.
ExtraCash remains the core monetization engine. Originations increased 27% to $2.3 billion, while average advance size reached $215. Dave is also removing legacy fee caps and plans to support higher limits, which can lift revenue per user. Compared with Sezzle, however, Dave’s near-term growth remains more concentrated around one credit product.
Credit performance has held up, while originations expanded. The 28-day past-due rate improved to 2.12%, and CashAI V6 is designed to support larger limits while managing losses. The Coastal Community Bank arrangement should also reduce Dave’s direct funding burden and improve capital efficiency as more receivables move through the structure.
There are additional growth options. Subscription revenues are becoming a larger part of the mix, and Dave Flex could eventually deepen card engagement. Still, Flex is in testing, and management does not expect meaningful 2026 revenues from it. This makes the product more optionality than a proven driver today.
Dave’s profitability and guidance remain supportive, with adjusted EBITDA growth outpacing the improvement in revenues. Yet higher ExtraCash limits, pricing changes, increased marketing and an unresolved DOJ matter add execution and regulatory considerations. The business is performing well, but Sezzle currently offers a more diversified set of growth levers for future expansion.
How Do Estimates Compare for SEZL & DAVE?
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Sezzle’s 2026 and 2027 sales calls for year-over-year growth of 35.30% and 24.53%, respectively. The consensus estimates for both 2026 and 2027 EPS have been revised notably upward over the past 60 days, and the figures suggest a year-over-year increase of 45.96% and 27.10%, respectively.
For Sezzle:
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Dave’s 2026 and 2027 sales implies year-over-year growth of 31.73% and 22.48%, respectively. Over the past 60 days, estimates for DAVE’s 2026 and 2027 EPS have been revised northward. The consensus mark for 2026 and 2027 EPS calls for a year-over-year jump of 31.49% and 30.70%, respectively.
For Dave:
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Price Performance and Valuation of SEZL & DAVE
So far in the year, Sezzle shares have surged 72.9%, while Dave shares have risen 49.7%. In comparison, the S&P 500 composite has advanced 12% in the same time frame.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
On a forward 12-month price-to-sales basis, SEZL and DAVE now trade at broadly similar valuations. SEZL is valued at 5.14 times forward sales, while DAVE is at 4.97 times. With little valuation gap between them, the comparison shifts toward growth quality. Sezzle’s faster revenue expansion, rising subscriber base and broader product rollout provide stronger support for its multiple. Dave’s growth and improving margins remain attractive, but greater dependence on ExtraCash makes execution and credit trends more important.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Conclusion
Both SEZL and DAVE have credible growth paths, improving economics and clear consumer demand, but their risk-reward profiles are starting to separate. Sezzle combines faster top-line growth with subscriber gains, rising purchase frequency, merchant expansion and a product roadmap that is widening beyond BNPL without sacrificing profitability.
Dave is executing well, particularly in acquisition, credit performance and capital efficiency, yet its next leg relies more heavily on higher ExtraCash monetization, larger advances and products still being tested. For investors choosing between the two today, SEZL offers the more compelling setup for fresh capital, while DAVE looks better suited to patient existing shareholders.
View the Zacks #1 Rank List
Image: Shutterstock
SEZL vs. DAVE: Which Consumer Fintech Stock Is the Better Bet?
Key Takeaways
Sezzle Inc. (SEZL - Free Report) and Dave Inc. (DAVE - Free Report) are trying to solve a similar consumer problem: giving financially stretched users faster, simpler access to payments and short-term liquidity through digital platforms. Both are expanding beyond their original products, using underwriting technology to manage credit risk and leaning on engagement to lift revenue per customer. This common ground makes SEZL and DAVE suitable for a fintech face-off.
Their paths, however, are different. Sezzle began with buy-now, pay-later (BNPL) and is building a wider ecosystem around subscriptions, shopping, cash advances and money transfers. Dave is a neobank whose economics remain centered on ExtraCash, with its debit card, subscriptions and developing Flex product widening the relationship.
Sezzle is currently growing faster and has several products that can deepen user frequency, while Dave brings a larger member base, strong acquisition efficiency and improving funding flexibility. The comparison comes down to growth breadth, monetization durability, credit discipline and execution.
The Case for SEZL
Sezzle’s appeal starts with a business that is becoming recurring and engaged. Active subscribers reached 854,000 in the second quarter, up 76.4% from a year earlier, while quarterly purchase frequency climbed to a record 7.2 times. These trends suggest Sezzle is building habits, not simply processing occasional BNPL purchases.
The subscription model also gives Sezzle room to add services without relying only on merchant checkout volume. SezzleCash extends the relationship into short-term liquidity, while Sezzle Send moves the platform into peer-to-peer payments. Early SezzleCash usage was encouraging, and management’s guidance assumes little contribution from the newer products, leaving room for upside if adoption develops well. Sezzle’s August agreement with WebBank expanded its bank program to support SezzleCash and Sezzle Send, giving these newer products a clearer funding framework.
Merchant expansion supports the other side of the network. In September, Sezzle announced Gymshark, Debenhams Group and Follett Higher Education as checkout additions, extending its reach across fashion and campus retail. Compared with Dave, which remains more dependent on ExtraCash monetization, Sezzle has more routes to increase transactions and customer touchpoints.
The economics are also supporting investment. Revenues advanced 51.7% year over year, while adjusted EBITDA reached $58 million, and the adjusted EBITDA margin held at 38.8%. Sezzle’s net transaction margin was 63.5%, near the upper end of its stated target range, even as marketing spending increased sharply.
Execution and credit losses still deserve attention, especially as Sezzle expands beyond BNPL. Yet its combination of subscriber growth, higher purchase frequency, merchant additions and new financial products creates a broader growth runway. The upgraded 2026 outlook reinforces the case that growth and profitability can coexist for investors.
The Case for DAVE
Dave has plenty working in its favor, particularly customer acquisition and ExtraCash engagement. The company added 951,000 new members in the second quarter, up 32% year over year, while customer acquisition cost stayed at $19. Monthly transacting members rose 17% to 3.08 million, showing that acquisition is translating into activity.
ExtraCash remains the core monetization engine. Originations increased 27% to $2.3 billion, while average advance size reached $215. Dave is also removing legacy fee caps and plans to support higher limits, which can lift revenue per user. Compared with Sezzle, however, Dave’s near-term growth remains more concentrated around one credit product.
Credit performance has held up, while originations expanded. The 28-day past-due rate improved to 2.12%, and CashAI V6 is designed to support larger limits while managing losses. The Coastal Community Bank arrangement should also reduce Dave’s direct funding burden and improve capital efficiency as more receivables move through the structure.
There are additional growth options. Subscription revenues are becoming a larger part of the mix, and Dave Flex could eventually deepen card engagement. Still, Flex is in testing, and management does not expect meaningful 2026 revenues from it. This makes the product more optionality than a proven driver today.
Dave’s profitability and guidance remain supportive, with adjusted EBITDA growth outpacing the improvement in revenues. Yet higher ExtraCash limits, pricing changes, increased marketing and an unresolved DOJ matter add execution and regulatory considerations. The business is performing well, but Sezzle currently offers a more diversified set of growth levers for future expansion.
How Do Estimates Compare for SEZL & DAVE?
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Sezzle’s 2026 and 2027 sales calls for year-over-year growth of 35.30% and 24.53%, respectively. The consensus estimates for both 2026 and 2027 EPS have been revised notably upward over the past 60 days, and the figures suggest a year-over-year increase of 45.96% and 27.10%, respectively.
For Sezzle:
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Dave’s 2026 and 2027 sales implies year-over-year growth of 31.73% and 22.48%, respectively. Over the past 60 days, estimates for DAVE’s 2026 and 2027 EPS have been revised northward. The consensus mark for 2026 and 2027 EPS calls for a year-over-year jump of 31.49% and 30.70%, respectively.
For Dave:
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Price Performance and Valuation of SEZL & DAVE
So far in the year, Sezzle shares have surged 72.9%, while Dave shares have risen 49.7%. In comparison, the S&P 500 composite has advanced 12% in the same time frame.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
On a forward 12-month price-to-sales basis, SEZL and DAVE now trade at broadly similar valuations. SEZL is valued at 5.14 times forward sales, while DAVE is at 4.97 times. With little valuation gap between them, the comparison shifts toward growth quality. Sezzle’s faster revenue expansion, rising subscriber base and broader product rollout provide stronger support for its multiple. Dave’s growth and improving margins remain attractive, but greater dependence on ExtraCash makes execution and credit trends more important.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Conclusion
Both SEZL and DAVE have credible growth paths, improving economics and clear consumer demand, but their risk-reward profiles are starting to separate. Sezzle combines faster top-line growth with subscriber gains, rising purchase frequency, merchant expansion and a product roadmap that is widening beyond BNPL without sacrificing profitability.
Dave is executing well, particularly in acquisition, credit performance and capital efficiency, yet its next leg relies more heavily on higher ExtraCash monetization, larger advances and products still being tested. For investors choosing between the two today, SEZL offers the more compelling setup for fresh capital, while DAVE looks better suited to patient existing shareholders.
While SEZL carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), DAVE has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.