We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Fed Considers Higher Asset Thresholds: What it Means for Banks
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
U.S. Bancorp and other banks could gain more room to grow before tougher rules apply.
Higher thresholds could reduce compliance costs and support faster loan and deposit growth.
WAL and ZION could gain more headroom to cross $100B without immediate added requirements.
The Federal Reserve is reportedly considering raising the asset thresholds that trigger stricter regulatory requirements for U.S. banks, reducing the compliance costs and giving regional lenders greater room to expand, according to a Yahoo Finance article citing Reuters.
The Fed is reportedly preparing to revise the asset thresholds that pull banks into stress-testing and heightened capital, liquidity and reporting obligations, with the adjustment aimed at reflecting inflation and broader economic growth.
U.S. Bancorp (USB - Free Report) , Capital One Financial (COF - Free Report) , PNC Financial (PNC - Free Report) and Truist Financial each currently clustered near the $700-billion mark could be among the key beneficiaries, as raising the threshold toward $1 trillion may give them greater flexibility to grow organically or pursue acquisitions before facing more stringent requirements. Smaller regional banks, including Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL - Free Report) and Zions Bancorporation (ZION - Free Report) , could also benefit by gaining more room to cross $100 billion in assets without immediately becoming subject to all the rules currently triggered at that level, while banks with roughly $100-$150 billion in assets may see some existing regulatory obligations eased.
At present, regulatory requirements become progressively stricter as banks cross the $100-billion, $250-billion and $700-billion asset thresholds. Raising these limits could reduce regulatory burdens, provide banks with greater balance-sheet flexibility and potentially encourage consolidation across the regional banking industry.
Why Is the Fed Considering Higher Thresholds?
The proposed changes reflect a broader effort to make banking regulation more responsive to changes in the size of the U.S. economy. Federal Reserve vice chairman for Supervision Michelle Bowman has argued that fixed asset thresholds can become increasingly restrictive over time because they do not automatically adjust for inflation or economic expansion. In January, Bowman suggested indexing thresholds to nominal gross domestic product, which captures both inflation and real economic growth.
Bowman reiterated the point in July, noting that banks with essentially unchanged risk profiles can cross regulatory thresholds simply because the overall economy has expanded. The Fed has therefore been working on approaches that would allow fixed thresholds to rise over time.
For banks like U.S. Bancorp, PNC Financial, Capital One, Western Alliance and Zions, crossing one of these regulatory lines can be expensive. Institutions may need additional compliance personnel, risk-management infrastructure, stress-testing capabilities and regulatory reporting systems. Reuters reported that the incremental costs associated with passing the $100-billion level can run into tens of millions of dollars annually.
Here’s How Higher Regulatory Thresholds Could Benefit Banks
Higher regulatory thresholds could benefit banks by giving them greater flexibility to expand without immediately facing stricter compliance requirements and higher recurring costs. This could improve operating efficiency, support faster loan and deposit growth, and reduce the incentive for banks nearing existing thresholds to deliberately limit balance-sheet expansion.
The additional regulatory headroom could also make mergers and acquisitions more attractive, particularly for mid-sized and regional banks seeking greater scale to absorb technology, compliance and other operating expenses. Banks could evaluate potential deals more on strategic and financial merits rather than on whether a transaction would push them into a tougher regulatory category. Larger regional banks such as U.S. Bancorp, PNC, Truist and Capital One could especially benefit from having more room to grow before encountering another step-up in regulatory requirements.
Final Words on Fed Considering Higher Thresholds?
While the Fed’s proposal is still taking shape, higher regulatory thresholds could meaningfully improve the growth runway for regional banks. By reducing the likelihood of an immediate jump in compliance costs as assets expand, the changes could support greater balance-sheet growth, operating efficiency and M&A activity.
For investors, the development makes USB, COF, PNC, WAL and ZION worth watching as details of the Fed's eventual proposal emerge.
View the Zacks #1 Rank List
Image: Bigstock
Fed Considers Higher Asset Thresholds: What it Means for Banks
Key Takeaways
The Federal Reserve is reportedly considering raising the asset thresholds that trigger stricter regulatory requirements for U.S. banks, reducing the compliance costs and giving regional lenders greater room to expand, according to a Yahoo Finance article citing Reuters.
The Fed is reportedly preparing to revise the asset thresholds that pull banks into stress-testing and heightened capital, liquidity and reporting obligations, with the adjustment aimed at reflecting inflation and broader economic growth.
U.S. Bancorp (USB - Free Report) , Capital One Financial (COF - Free Report) , PNC Financial (PNC - Free Report) and Truist Financial each currently clustered near the $700-billion mark could be among the key beneficiaries, as raising the threshold toward $1 trillion may give them greater flexibility to grow organically or pursue acquisitions before facing more stringent requirements. Smaller regional banks, including Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL - Free Report) and Zions Bancorporation (ZION - Free Report) , could also benefit by gaining more room to cross $100 billion in assets without immediately becoming subject to all the rules currently triggered at that level, while banks with roughly $100-$150 billion in assets may see some existing regulatory obligations eased.
At present, regulatory requirements become progressively stricter as banks cross the $100-billion, $250-billion and $700-billion asset thresholds. Raising these limits could reduce regulatory burdens, provide banks with greater balance-sheet flexibility and potentially encourage consolidation across the regional banking industry.
Why Is the Fed Considering Higher Thresholds?
The proposed changes reflect a broader effort to make banking regulation more responsive to changes in the size of the U.S. economy. Federal Reserve vice chairman for Supervision Michelle Bowman has argued that fixed asset thresholds can become increasingly restrictive over time because they do not automatically adjust for inflation or economic expansion. In January, Bowman suggested indexing thresholds to nominal gross domestic product, which captures both inflation and real economic growth.
Bowman reiterated the point in July, noting that banks with essentially unchanged risk profiles can cross regulatory thresholds simply because the overall economy has expanded. The Fed has therefore been working on approaches that would allow fixed thresholds to rise over time.
For banks like U.S. Bancorp, PNC Financial, Capital One, Western Alliance and Zions, crossing one of these regulatory lines can be expensive. Institutions may need additional compliance personnel, risk-management infrastructure, stress-testing capabilities and regulatory reporting systems. Reuters reported that the incremental costs associated with passing the $100-billion level can run into tens of millions of dollars annually.
Here’s How Higher Regulatory Thresholds Could Benefit Banks
Higher regulatory thresholds could benefit banks by giving them greater flexibility to expand without immediately facing stricter compliance requirements and higher recurring costs. This could improve operating efficiency, support faster loan and deposit growth, and reduce the incentive for banks nearing existing thresholds to deliberately limit balance-sheet expansion.
The additional regulatory headroom could also make mergers and acquisitions more attractive, particularly for mid-sized and regional banks seeking greater scale to absorb technology, compliance and other operating expenses. Banks could evaluate potential deals more on strategic and financial merits rather than on whether a transaction would push them into a tougher regulatory category. Larger regional banks such as U.S. Bancorp, PNC, Truist and Capital One could especially benefit from having more room to grow before encountering another step-up in regulatory requirements.
Final Words on Fed Considering Higher Thresholds?
While the Fed’s proposal is still taking shape, higher regulatory thresholds could meaningfully improve the growth runway for regional banks. By reducing the likelihood of an immediate jump in compliance costs as assets expand, the changes could support greater balance-sheet growth, operating efficiency and M&A activity.
For investors, the development makes USB, COF, PNC, WAL and ZION worth watching as details of the Fed's eventual proposal emerge.