The robotaxi industry has moved from an experimental concept toward a potentially massive transportation market. Goldman Sachs Research estimates that the global robotaxi market could reach roughly $415 billion by 2035, with the United States accounting for about $48 billion. That opportunity has put two names at the center of the race— Tesla (TSLA Quick QuoteTSLA - Free Report) and Alphabet’s (GOOGL Quick QuoteGOOGL - Free Report) Waymo.

Both are pursuing autonomous mobility, but their strategies are fundamentally different. Waymo has built an early lead through real-world deployments, while Tesla is betting that a simpler technology stack and its manufacturing scale can eventually change the economics of the business.

While Alphabet carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), Tesla holds a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) currently.

You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

Waymo Has the Early Lead

Waymo, Alphabet’s autonomous vehicle subsidiary, currently has the clearest advantage when it comes to commercial robotaxi operations. The company has expanded to 15 major U.S. cities and now provides more than 500,000 fully autonomous paid rides each week.

That scale matters for more than just revenues. Every additional ride gives Waymo more opportunity to familiarize consumers with driverless transportation and build confidence in the technology. Waymo is not just expanding its network, it is helping create the market Tesla eventually wants to compete in.

Waymo’s lead, however, comes with a substantial cost. The company continues to invest heavily in technology and geographic expansion and remains unprofitable. Its capital-intensive model means that scaling the business requires significant investment.

Tesla Is Taking a Different Route

Tesla entered the commercial robotaxi race later, launching its service in Austin in June 2025. The company has since expanded robotaxi operations to seven U.S. metros (per the second-quarter earnings report), with unsupervised driving being rolled out in cities including Austin, Dallas, Houston, Miami, Orlando and Tampa.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

Tesla has accumulated roughly 380,000 driverless miles, as highlighted in its second-quarter 2026 earnings release.

Its bigger bet, however, is the Cybercab. Tesla rolled out the much-awaited Cybercab last month. The purpose-built, two-seat robotaxi eliminates the steering wheel and pedals and is designed specifically for autonomous operation.

For now, Cybercab rides are limited to Austin, though the vehicles have been spotted undergoing testing across several U.S. states and regions. Tesla has indicated plans to expand Cybercab deployments to additional U.S. cities in the coming months. Tesla's authorized Cybercab fleet in Texas has nearly quadrupled since launch, climbing from 45 vehicles to 169, according to Texas Department of Motor Vehicles’ records, as cited in CNBC.

Tesla has also taken a minimalist approach to hardware. The Cybercab relies on cameras and Tesla’s AI computing rather than the radar, LiDAR, and high-definition mapping systems commonly associated with autonomous vehicles. Dropping expensive sensors saves thousands of dollars per vehicle. That could become Tesla’s biggest competitive advantage.

The Real Battle May Be About Economics

Waymo’s technology has demonstrated that autonomous rides can work commercially today. Tesla is trying to prove that robotaxis can eventually be produced and operated at enormous scale and at a much lower cost.

Tesla already has extensive vehicle manufacturing capabilities. If its autonomous software reaches the required level of reliability, Tesla could potentially produce large numbers of Cybercabs without the hardware costs associated with more sensor-heavy approaches.

Tesla also believes its vision-based system can eventually operate across a much broader range of roads rather than being restricted to tightly mapped operating zones. If that vision becomes reality, the company could have a powerful scaling advantage.

The Regulatory Roadblock

Regulators may ultimately decide the pace of this race. Texas, where Tesla runs driverless service, is considered relatively permissive. California is different. While Waymo already operates commercially there, Tesla has applied for a permit but not yet received one.

Federal regulators are also looking closely at the Cybercab. As it has no human controls, the usual process of self-certifying that a vehicle meets safety standards is under audit. Europe and China could be harder still, since neither allows self-certification.

Final Thoughts

For now, Waymo is clearly ahead, with more rides, broader commercial coverage and a meaningful first-mover advantage. Tesla’s potential edge lies in lower cost, manufacturing scale and a system designed for much broader deployment. But it still has to prove that its camera-only approach can deliver reliable autonomy at scale.

The race is far from over. Waymo will likely deepen its lead, while Tesla could close the gap if its technology delivers. In a market this large, both can thrive, and the real winners may be riders who end up with more choices.