We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, revised Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
The semiconductor giant’s decision to hire Tom Peterson, former director of technical marketing at NVIDIA, is a step toward that direction.
Notably, Tom Peterson, popularly known as “TAP” has served NVIDIA for almost 15 years and recently announced his departure. Intel intends to utilize Peterson’s expertise in the company’s Game Experience Team.
Intel’s talent acquisition strategy focused on graphics also involved hiring of Raja Koduri and Chris Hookfrom AMD, and Jim Keller from Tesla (TSLA - Free Report) in the past.
Notably, Koduri, who leads Intel’s graphics team, enabled the company to come up with a teaser of upcoming dedicated graphics card. In fact, the graphics card is scheduled to hit the market as early as 2020.
Intel also acquired Hyderabad, India-based Ineda Systems, a fables chip maker, to accelerate its discrete GPU business initiatives. Almost 100 engineers of Ineda Systems with SoC (or system on chip) expertise are said to be part of Intel's graphics division.
Intel Faces Tough Challenge
Growing proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques and machine learning (ML) tools in industries like gaming, automotive, blockchain and cloud computing are primarily responsible for driving GPU demand. Increasing allegiance to video streaming services also deserves a special mention in this regard.
Per latest IHS Markit data, “consumer spending on cloud gaming content subscriptions reached $234 million in 2018 and is forecast to grow to $1.5 billion by 2023.”
The strong growth prospects of the space have been alluring for Intel. However, the fight will certainly not be an easy one as NVIDIA and AMD have dominated the space for the past two decades. NVIDIA’s dominance in the market on account of the significantly higher functionality of its GPU cards is noteworthy.Meanwhile,AMD’s expanding GPU portfolio catering to every price points cannot be ignored.
Per latest JPR report, AMD holds discrete GPU market share of 18.8% in the fourth quarter of 2018, compared with NVIDIA’s 81.2%.
However, Intel’s efforts to make its foray in the discrete GPU market as grand as possible, holds potential to threaten the duopoly. The company’s presence is expected to negatively impact pricing and high margins enjoyed by both NVIDIA and AMD.
In particular, Intel’s strength in installed base, integrated graphics card expertise and enhanced IP portfolio, are likely to challenge NVIDIA’s competitive moat.
Intel is optimistic about its foray into the GPU market with Xe graphics family of discrete GPUs, dubbed Arctic Sound. The company also intends to enable the new graphics cards to support its OneAPI software, which simplifies programming across the company’s CPU, GPU, AI and FPGA accelerators.
Wrapping Up
Higher the competition, greater is the motivation to innovate, which bodes well for the industry. We also believe that Intel’s entry into GPU market will be welcomed by consumers as it likely to lead to reduction in pricing parameters.
While both AMD and NVIDIA carry Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
Today's Best Stocks from Zacks
Would you like to see the updated picks from our best market-beating strategies? From 2017 through 2018, while the S&P 500 gained +15.8%, five of our screens returned +38.0%, +61.3%, +61.6%, +68.1%, and +98.3%.
This outperformance has not just been a recent phenomenon. From 2000 – 2018, while the S&P averaged +4.8% per year, our top strategies averaged up to +56.2% per year. See their latest picks free >>
See More Zacks Research for These Tickers
Normally $25 each - click below to receive one report FREE:
Image: Bigstock
Should Intel's (INTC) GPU Ambitions Bother NVIDIA & AMD?
Intel (INTC - Free Report) is striving to make a mark in the GPU market, currently dominated by NVIDIA (NVDA - Free Report) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD - Free Report) .
The semiconductor giant’s decision to hire Tom Peterson, former director of technical marketing at NVIDIA, is a step toward that direction.
Notably, Tom Peterson, popularly known as “TAP” has served NVIDIA for almost 15 years and recently announced his departure. Intel intends to utilize Peterson’s expertise in the company’s Game Experience Team.
Intel’s talent acquisition strategy focused on graphics also involved hiring of Raja Koduri and Chris Hookfrom AMD, and Jim Keller from Tesla (TSLA - Free Report) in the past.
Notably, Koduri, who leads Intel’s graphics team, enabled the company to come up with a teaser of upcoming dedicated graphics card. In fact, the graphics card is scheduled to hit the market as early as 2020.
Intel also acquired Hyderabad, India-based Ineda Systems, a fables chip maker, to accelerate its discrete GPU business initiatives. Almost 100 engineers of Ineda Systems with SoC (or system on chip) expertise are said to be part of Intel's graphics division.
Intel Faces Tough Challenge
Growing proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques and machine learning (ML) tools in industries like gaming, automotive, blockchain and cloud computing are primarily responsible for driving GPU demand. Increasing allegiance to video streaming services also deserves a special mention in this regard.
Intel Corporation Revenue (TTM)
Intel Corporation Revenue (TTM) | Intel Corporation Quote
Per latest IHS Markit data, “consumer spending on cloud gaming content subscriptions reached $234 million in 2018 and is forecast to grow to $1.5 billion by 2023.”
The strong growth prospects of the space have been alluring for Intel. However, the fight will certainly not be an easy one as NVIDIA and AMD have dominated the space for the past two decades. NVIDIA’s dominance in the market on account of the significantly higher functionality of its GPU cards is noteworthy.Meanwhile,AMD’s expanding GPU portfolio catering to every price points cannot be ignored.
Per latest JPR report, AMD holds discrete GPU market share of 18.8% in the fourth quarter of 2018, compared with NVIDIA’s 81.2%.
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Revenue (TTM)
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Revenue (TTM) | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Quote
However, Intel’s efforts to make its foray in the discrete GPU market as grand as possible, holds potential to threaten the duopoly. The company’s presence is expected to negatively impact pricing and high margins enjoyed by both NVIDIA and AMD.
In particular, Intel’s strength in installed base, integrated graphics card expertise and enhanced IP portfolio, are likely to challenge NVIDIA’s competitive moat.
NVIDIA Corporation Revenue (TTM)
NVIDIA Corporation Revenue (TTM) | NVIDIA Corporation Quote
Intel is optimistic about its foray into the GPU market with Xe graphics family of discrete GPUs, dubbed Arctic Sound. The company also intends to enable the new graphics cards to support its OneAPI software, which simplifies programming across the company’s CPU, GPU, AI and FPGA accelerators.
Wrapping Up
Higher the competition, greater is the motivation to innovate, which bodes well for the industry. We also believe that Intel’s entry into GPU market will be welcomed by consumers as it likely to lead to reduction in pricing parameters.
Intel carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy).You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
While both AMD and NVIDIA carry Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
Today's Best Stocks from Zacks
Would you like to see the updated picks from our best market-beating strategies? From 2017 through 2018, while the S&P 500 gained +15.8%, five of our screens returned +38.0%, +61.3%, +61.6%, +68.1%, and +98.3%.
This outperformance has not just been a recent phenomenon. From 2000 – 2018, while the S&P averaged +4.8% per year, our top strategies averaged up to +56.2% per year.
See their latest picks free >>