We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
The Zacks Analyst Blog Rocket, PennyMac , Wells Fargo , Bank of America and JPMorgan
Read MoreHide Full Article
For Immediate Releases
Chicago, IL – February 20, 2026 – Zacks.com announces the list of stocks featured in the Analyst Blog. Every day the Zacks Equity Research analysts discuss the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets. Stocks recently featured in the blog include Rocket Companies Inc. (RKT - Free Report) , PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI - Free Report) , Wells Fargo (WFC - Free Report) , Bank of America (BAC - Free Report) and JPMorgan (JPM - Free Report) .
Here are highlights from Friday’s Analyst Blog:
Fed's Mortgage Pivot: What It Means for Banks & Non-Bank Lenders
The Federal Reserve is preparing to propose regulatory changes that could encourage large banks to re-enter the mortgage origination and servicing business in a more meaningful way. The effort, led by vice chair for supervision, Michelle Bowman, reflects growing concern that post-financial crisis capital rules may have unintentionally pushed mortgage activity out of the traditional banking system and into non-bank lenders.
If implemented, the changes could significantly reshape the competitive landscape. Non-bank lenders such as Rocket Companies Inc. and PennyMac Financial Services may face heightened pressure as banks reassert themselves. Meanwhile, major institutions like Wells Fargo, Bank of America and JPMorgan could be positioned to regain market share.
Why Banks Pulled Back From Mortgages
In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, regulators strengthened capital standards under the global Basel frameworks to enhance financial stability. While these reforms made banks more resilient, they also increased the cost of holding certain mortgage-related assets. Over time, banks like Wells Fargo, Bank of America and JPMorgan’s share of mortgage originations declined significantly. At the same time, non-bank lenders gained dominance.
A key factor was the regulatory treatment of mortgage servicing rights (MSRs). Strict capital deductions and a 250% risk-weighting requirement made MSRs capital-intensive for banks. As a result, many institutions chose to sell servicing portfolios to non-bank firms, accelerating the shift of mortgage activity outside the traditional banking sector.
Details of the Proposed Changes by the Fed
The Fed is preparing a series of targeted adjustments aimed at reshaping how mortgage-related assets are treated under bank capital rules. At the center of the proposal is a significant change to the handling of mortgage servicing assets (MSRs).
Currently, banks are required to deduct MSRs from certain components of core regulatory capital, effectively increasing the amount of capital they must hold. This treatment has made servicing rights comparatively expensive to retain, prompting many banks to sell these assets to non-bank lenders. The proposed reform would eliminate this deduction requirement, easing the capital burden and improving the economic appeal of maintaining servicing portfolios in-house.
In addition, regulators are reassessing the 250% risk weight applied to MSRs — a level substantially higher than many other asset classes. By recalibrating the risk weight to better align with observed risk characteristics, the Fed aims to create a more proportionate and risk-sensitive capital framework.
The reforms extend beyond servicing assets to the treatment of residential mortgage loans themselves. Rather than applying broad, standardized capital requirements, the Fed is exploring a more nuanced approach that ties capital charges to measurable risk factors, such as loan-to-value ratios and borrower credit quality. Under this framework, lower-risk mortgages would attract reduced capital requirements, incentivizing banks to expand prudent lending while maintaining safeguards against higher-risk exposures.
Implications of Proposed Changes for Banks & Non-Bank Lenders
For banks such as Wells Fargo, Bank of America and JPMorgan, the proposed changes could meaningfully improve returns on equity in mortgage businesses. Reducing the capital intensity of MSRs and certain residential loans would make origination and servicing more economically attractive.
Mortgage banking provides stable fee income that is less sensitive to interest rate cycles than net interest margins. It also strengthens long-term customer relationships and creates cross-selling opportunities across deposits, wealth management and other financial services. A regulatory reset could help banks diversify revenues and rebuild their competitive position in housing finance.
For non-bank lenders like PennyMac Financial Services and Rocket Mortgage, however, the shift may narrow a structural advantage. These firms expanded rapidly in part because they were not subject to the same capital constraints as banks. If those constraints are eased, competition is likely to intensify.
Greater bank participation could compress pricing, thin margins and shift market share. While non-banks may continue to compete through digital efficiency, cost discipline and niche specialization, the overall outcome would likely be a more balanced and competitive mortgage market.
Why Haven't You Looked at Zacks' Top Stocks?
Since 2000, our top stock-picking strategies have blown away the S&P's +7.7% average gain per year. Amazingly, they soared with average gains of +48.4%, +50.2% and +56.7% per year.
Today you can access their live picks without cost or obligation.
Note: Sheraz Mian heads the Zacks Equity Research department and is a well-regarded expert of aggregate earnings. He is frequently quoted in the print and electronic media and publishes the weekly Earnings Trends and Earnings Previewreports. If you want an email notification each time Sheraz publishes a new article, please click here>>>
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of herein and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Zacks Investment Research does not engage in investment banking, market making or asset management activities of any securities. These returns are from hypothetical portfolios consisting of stocks with Zacks Rank = 1 that were rebalanced monthly with zero transaction costs. These are not the returns of actual portfolios of stocks. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index. Visit https://www.zacks.com/performance for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.
Zacks' 7 Best Strong Buy Stocks (New Research Report)
Valued at $99, click below to receive our just-released report
predicting the 7 stocks that will soar highest in the coming month.
View the Zacks #1 Rank List
Image: Bigstock
The Zacks Analyst Blog Rocket, PennyMac , Wells Fargo , Bank of America and JPMorgan
For Immediate Releases
Chicago, IL – February 20, 2026 – Zacks.com announces the list of stocks featured in the Analyst Blog. Every day the Zacks Equity Research analysts discuss the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets. Stocks recently featured in the blog include Rocket Companies Inc. (RKT - Free Report) , PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI - Free Report) , Wells Fargo (WFC - Free Report) , Bank of America (BAC - Free Report) and JPMorgan (JPM - Free Report) .
Here are highlights from Friday’s Analyst Blog:
Fed's Mortgage Pivot: What It Means for Banks & Non-Bank Lenders
The Federal Reserve is preparing to propose regulatory changes that could encourage large banks to re-enter the mortgage origination and servicing business in a more meaningful way. The effort, led by vice chair for supervision, Michelle Bowman, reflects growing concern that post-financial crisis capital rules may have unintentionally pushed mortgage activity out of the traditional banking system and into non-bank lenders.
If implemented, the changes could significantly reshape the competitive landscape. Non-bank lenders such as Rocket Companies Inc. and PennyMac Financial Services may face heightened pressure as banks reassert themselves. Meanwhile, major institutions like Wells Fargo, Bank of America and JPMorgan could be positioned to regain market share.
Why Banks Pulled Back From Mortgages
In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, regulators strengthened capital standards under the global Basel frameworks to enhance financial stability. While these reforms made banks more resilient, they also increased the cost of holding certain mortgage-related assets. Over time, banks like Wells Fargo, Bank of America and JPMorgan’s share of mortgage originations declined significantly. At the same time, non-bank lenders gained dominance.
A key factor was the regulatory treatment of mortgage servicing rights (MSRs). Strict capital deductions and a 250% risk-weighting requirement made MSRs capital-intensive for banks. As a result, many institutions chose to sell servicing portfolios to non-bank firms, accelerating the shift of mortgage activity outside the traditional banking sector.
Details of the Proposed Changes by the Fed
The Fed is preparing a series of targeted adjustments aimed at reshaping how mortgage-related assets are treated under bank capital rules. At the center of the proposal is a significant change to the handling of mortgage servicing assets (MSRs).
Currently, banks are required to deduct MSRs from certain components of core regulatory capital, effectively increasing the amount of capital they must hold. This treatment has made servicing rights comparatively expensive to retain, prompting many banks to sell these assets to non-bank lenders. The proposed reform would eliminate this deduction requirement, easing the capital burden and improving the economic appeal of maintaining servicing portfolios in-house.
In addition, regulators are reassessing the 250% risk weight applied to MSRs — a level substantially higher than many other asset classes. By recalibrating the risk weight to better align with observed risk characteristics, the Fed aims to create a more proportionate and risk-sensitive capital framework.
The reforms extend beyond servicing assets to the treatment of residential mortgage loans themselves. Rather than applying broad, standardized capital requirements, the Fed is exploring a more nuanced approach that ties capital charges to measurable risk factors, such as loan-to-value ratios and borrower credit quality. Under this framework, lower-risk mortgages would attract reduced capital requirements, incentivizing banks to expand prudent lending while maintaining safeguards against higher-risk exposures.
Implications of Proposed Changes for Banks & Non-Bank Lenders
For banks such as Wells Fargo, Bank of America and JPMorgan, the proposed changes could meaningfully improve returns on equity in mortgage businesses. Reducing the capital intensity of MSRs and certain residential loans would make origination and servicing more economically attractive.
Mortgage banking provides stable fee income that is less sensitive to interest rate cycles than net interest margins. It also strengthens long-term customer relationships and creates cross-selling opportunities across deposits, wealth management and other financial services. A regulatory reset could help banks diversify revenues and rebuild their competitive position in housing finance.
For non-bank lenders like PennyMac Financial Services and Rocket Mortgage, however, the shift may narrow a structural advantage. These firms expanded rapidly in part because they were not subject to the same capital constraints as banks. If those constraints are eased, competition is likely to intensify.
Greater bank participation could compress pricing, thin margins and shift market share. While non-banks may continue to compete through digital efficiency, cost discipline and niche specialization, the overall outcome would likely be a more balanced and competitive mortgage market.
Why Haven't You Looked at Zacks' Top Stocks?
Since 2000, our top stock-picking strategies have blown away the S&P's +7.7% average gain per year. Amazingly, they soared with average gains of +48.4%, +50.2% and +56.7% per year.
Today you can access their live picks without cost or obligation.
See Stocks Free >>
Note: Sheraz Mian heads the Zacks Equity Research department and is a well-regarded expert of aggregate earnings. He is frequently quoted in the print and electronic media and publishes the weekly Earnings Trends and Earnings Previewreports. If you want an email notification each time Sheraz publishes a new article, please click here>>>
Media Contact
Zacks Investment Research
800-767-3771 ext. 9339
support@zacks.com
https://www.zacks.com
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of herein and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Zacks Investment Research does not engage in investment banking, market making or asset management activities of any securities. These returns are from hypothetical portfolios consisting of stocks with Zacks Rank = 1 that were rebalanced monthly with zero transaction costs. These are not the returns of actual portfolios of stocks. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index. Visit https://www.zacks.com/performance for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.