Back to top

Analyst Blog

According to Bloomberg, the U.S. District Judge Louis Stanton in Manhattan rescinded the bid filed by Wall Street biggies along with other banks, regarding the dismissal of a lawsuit charged against the bank, accusing it of selling risky debts via misleading statements. Stanton has ordered the plaintiffs to pursue the proceedings over their claims against banks.

Such decisions come as a major blow to the big banks that are already burdened under numerous litigations related to the sale of risky mortgage-backed securities (MBS).

Background

The aforesaid lawsuit has been filed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) against major banks in 2012, over the alleged sale of $388 million of risky MBS to the failed Colonial Bank. Apart from attorney fees and court expenses, the FDIC asked for $189 million in damages.

Colonial Bank-based in Montgomery, Ala. failed in Aug 2009 and was acquired by BB&T Corp. (BBT - Analyst Report). At that time, Colonial Bank had nearly $25 billion in assets and the FDIC had estimated the cost to the federal deposit-insurance fund to be $2.8 billion.

The major lenders against whose units the FDIC filed the lawsuit include biggies like JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM - Analyst Report), Bank of America Corporation (BAC - Analyst Report), Citigroup Inc. (C - Analyst Report), Wells Fargo & Company (WFC - Analyst Report), Deutsche Bank AG (DB - Analyst Report), Credit Suisse Group (CS - Snapshot Report), HSBC Holdings plc , UBS AG (UBS - Analyst Report), Ally Financial Inc. and The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (RBS - Snapshot Report), among others. The FDIC has alleged that the lenders distorted the facts related to the MBS sold to Colonial Bank.

Moreover, the FDIC accused the banks of not disclosing authentic facts related to the quality of the underlying assets while selling risky MBS to Colonial Bank. This also included distortion of loan-to-value ratios that were based on the inflated property values. Further, the fact that a large number of these properties had second mortgages was also concealed.

Our Viewpoint

The regulators are proactively trying to recover losses through lawsuits against banks that were involved in malpractices related to the sale of mortgage-backed securities. Moreover, the investors and other financial institutions, which suffered as a result of these faulty practices, are expected to get a breather.

Please login to Zacks.com or register to post a comment.

New to Zacks?

Start Here

Zacks Investment Research

Close

Are you a new Zacks Member or a visitor to Zacks.com?

Top Zacks Features

My Portfolio Tracker

Is it Time to Sell?

One of the most important steps you can take today is to set up your portfolio tracker on Zacks.com. Once you do, you'll be notified of major events affecting your stocks and/or funds with daily email alerts.

More Zacks Resources

Zacks Rank Home - Evaluate your stocks and use the Zacks Rank to eliminate the losers and keep the winners.

Mutual Fund Rank Home - Evaluate your funds with the Mutual Fund Rank for both your personal and retirement funds.

Stock/Mutual Fund Screening - Find better stocks and mutual funds. The ones most likely to beat the market and provide a positive return.

My Portfolio - Track your Portfolio and find out where your stocks/mutual funds stack up with the Zacks Rank.

Zacks #1 Rank Top Movers for Zacks #1 Rank Top Movers

Company Symbol Price %Chg
QIHOO 360 T… QIHU 95.04 +4.95%
PILGRIM'S P… PPC 31.52 +3.72%
CLAYTON WIL… CWEI 138.97 +3.55%
CALLON PETE… CPE 11.50 +3.14%
ACTELION LT… ALIOF 124.80 +2.97%