Back to top

Real Time Insight

I'll admit it. I've been a Keynesian. To me, pumping money into the economy, and monetizing debt through quantitiatve easing (i.e., printing new money), was the best course of action since 2008 because the alternative -- a Japan-style deflationary spiral -- was unacceptable and entirely avoidable. Inflation, of any amount, was worth all the risks.

But something curious is going on. The economy is not recovering in a robust way. After today's disappointing retail sales trend continued, Goldman Sachs lowered their 2Q GDP estimate another 2/10ths to 1.1%. They had dropped it to 1.3% from 1.6% just last week on more dismal economic data.

Yet financial markets -- stocks, bonds, gold, commodity prices -- seem to really benefit from QE. Below is a chart from a group called Phoenix Capital Research which plots the S&P 500 index minus the 24-hour pre-FOMC price ramps.

Granted there are other ways of looking at the effectiveness of QE on both markets and the economy. But today I am wondering if QE is still a necessary evil, or if it's actually distorting markets and could possibly damage the long-run health of the economy.

What do you see for the next 6-18 months of the US economy, with or without QE?

Just Released: 5 Stocks to Double

Today, you are invited to download a free Special Report from Zacks Investment Research. It reveals five moves that could gain +100% and more in the next 12 months:

One is The Next Great Innovator that looks to change the direction of our entire economy. Another is a recent IPO that already built a fortress in its segment. Still another, a small cap, has racked up 7 straight positive earnings surprises.

Close This Panel X

Please login to Zacks.com or register to post a comment.