This page is temporarily not available. Please check later as it should be available shortly. If you have any questions, please email customer support at firstname.lastname@example.org or call 800-767-3771 ext. 9339.
I'll admit it. I've been a Keynesian. To me, pumping money into the economy, and monetizing debt through quantitiatve easing (i.e., printing new money), was the best course of actionsince 2008because the alternative -- a Japan-style deflationary spiral -- was unacceptable and entirely avoidable. Inflation, of any amount, was worth all the risks.
But something curious is going on. The economy is not recovering in a robust way. After today's disappointing retail sales trend continued, Goldman Sachs lowered their 2Q GDP estimate another 2/10thsto 1.1%. They had dropped it to 1.3% from 1.6% just last week on more dismal economic data.
Yet financial markets -- stocks, bonds, gold, commodity prices -- seem to really benefit from QE. Below is a chart from a group called Phoenix Capital Research which plots the S&P 500 index minus the 24-hour pre-FOMC price ramps.
Granted there are other ways of looking at the effectiveness of QE on both markets and the economy. But today I am wondering if QE is still a necessary evil, or if it's actually distorting markets and could possibly damage the long-run health of the economy.
What do you see for the next 6-18 months of the US economy, with or without QE?
Please login to Zacks.com or register to post a comment.