We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
ENB's fee-based model offers income stability, yet high debt levels raise financial risk concerns.
ENB trades at 15.37X EV/EBITDA vs. CVE's 6.32X, suggesting a valuation premium for stability.
In the energy space, Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE - Free Report) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB - Free Report) are two major Canadian players with very contrasting business models. Over the past year, CVE has rallied 40.9%, significantly outperforming ENB’s 13.9% gain. But does stronger price performance automatically make Cenovus the better stock? Let us examine the fundamentals of both companies to find out.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Price performance alone does not fully capture a stock’s attractiveness, as it merely reflects investor sentiment across business cycles. To arrive at a sound investment conclusion, it is essential to evaluate fundamentals and the broader operating environment. While upstream and integrated producers like Cenovus face greater exposure to commodity price swings and energy transition risks, pipeline companies such as Enbridge typically offer lower-risk profiles and steadier income streams, often appealing to stability-seeking investors.
Soft Oil Prices to Hurt Cenovus’ Upstream Business
According to OilPrice.com, West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude is hovering around $64 per barrel, well below the year-ago level. Adding to the pressure, the U.S. Energy Information Administration projects the average WTI price at $52.21 per barrel for 2026, suggesting a decline from the $65.40 registered in 2025.
Cenovus produces heavy and bitumen-blend crude from the Canadian oil sands, with realized prices closely tied to Western Canadian Select (“WCS”). WCS typically trades at a discount to WTI due to heavier quality and higher transportation costs. When WTI prices fall, WCS prices generally decline as well, and the impacts on Cenovus can be amplified if WCS differentials widen.
Lower crude prices pressure Cenovus’ upstream netbacks and cash flows, even if production volumes remain stable. As a result, sustained softness in oil prices poses a meaningful headwind to Cenovus’ earnings outlook.
Enbridge’s Business Model is Less Vulnerable to Commodity Prices
Unlike upstream-focused energy producers, Enbridge’s business is not highly sensitive to commodity price fluctuations. ENB is one of North America’s largest midstream energy companies, operating a vast infrastructure network. Enbridge transports 20% of the natural gas consumed in the United States.
The company generates stable, fee-based revenues from long-term contracts, limiting both commodity price and volume risks. Enbridge is also positioned to generate incremental cash flows from its C$30-billion backlog of secured capital projects, spanning liquid pipelines, gas transmission, gas distribution, storage and renewables, with in-service dates extending through 2029.
Approximately 98% of Enbridge’s EBITDA is supported by regulated or take-or-pay contracts, and more than 80% of its profits come from businesses with built-in inflation protection, allowing the company to raise tariffs or fees as costs rise. This structure helps protect earnings and dividends even in a high-inflation environment.
Despite the resilience of Enbridge’s business model, challenges remain. The company’s debt-to-capitalization ratio of 60.4% is higher than the industry average of 57.7%, and its debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 4.8X sits near the upper end of management’s target range. Elevated leverage increases sensitivity to prolonged high interest rates and may limit financial flexibility if growth opportunities slow.
Earnings Estimate Revisions
Earnings momentum also favors caution. Over the past week, Zacks Consensus Estimates for Cenovus’ 2025 and 2026 earnings have declined, reflecting growing concern over oil price weakness.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Meanwhile, Enbridge’s estimates have been unchanged, modestly favoring the pipeline operator from a near-term stability perspective.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Valuation Comparison
From a valuation standpoint, investors appear willing to pay a premium for Enbridge’s stable midstream business model. ENB trades at a trailing 12-month EV/EBITDA of 15.37X, well above Cenovus’ 6.32X, indicating that much of Enbridge’s defensive appeal may already be priced in.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Final Verdict: Avoid or Sell Both Stocks for Now
While Cenovus offers higher upside potential in a strong oil price environment, the current soft crude outlook makes its upstream-heavy business model vulnerable. Enbridge, despite its stable cash flows, faces leverage-related risks and trades at a relatively elevated valuation.
As a result, risk-averse investors may want to avoid initiating positions in either stock at this time. Investors already holding ENB, with a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell), or CVE, carrying a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), may consider trimming or exiting positions until fundamentals and macro conditions improve.
See More Zacks Research for These Tickers
Normally $25 each - click below to receive one report FREE:
Image: Bigstock
Cenovus vs. Enbridge: Is it Time to Step Away From Both Stocks?
Key Takeaways
In the energy space, Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE - Free Report) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB - Free Report) are two major Canadian players with very contrasting business models. Over the past year, CVE has rallied 40.9%, significantly outperforming ENB’s 13.9% gain. But does stronger price performance automatically make Cenovus the better stock? Let us examine the fundamentals of both companies to find out.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Price performance alone does not fully capture a stock’s attractiveness, as it merely reflects investor sentiment across business cycles. To arrive at a sound investment conclusion, it is essential to evaluate fundamentals and the broader operating environment. While upstream and integrated producers like Cenovus face greater exposure to commodity price swings and energy transition risks, pipeline companies such as Enbridge typically offer lower-risk profiles and steadier income streams, often appealing to stability-seeking investors.
Soft Oil Prices to Hurt Cenovus’ Upstream Business
According to OilPrice.com, West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude is hovering around $64 per barrel, well below the year-ago level. Adding to the pressure, the U.S. Energy Information Administration projects the average WTI price at $52.21 per barrel for 2026, suggesting a decline from the $65.40 registered in 2025.
Cenovus produces heavy and bitumen-blend crude from the Canadian oil sands, with realized prices closely tied to Western Canadian Select (“WCS”). WCS typically trades at a discount to WTI due to heavier quality and higher transportation costs. When WTI prices fall, WCS prices generally decline as well, and the impacts on Cenovus can be amplified if WCS differentials widen.
Lower crude prices pressure Cenovus’ upstream netbacks and cash flows, even if production volumes remain stable. As a result, sustained softness in oil prices poses a meaningful headwind to Cenovus’ earnings outlook.
Enbridge’s Business Model is Less Vulnerable to Commodity Prices
Unlike upstream-focused energy producers, Enbridge’s business is not highly sensitive to commodity price fluctuations. ENB is one of North America’s largest midstream energy companies, operating a vast infrastructure network. Enbridge transports 20% of the natural gas consumed in the United States.
The company generates stable, fee-based revenues from long-term contracts, limiting both commodity price and volume risks. Enbridge is also positioned to generate incremental cash flows from its C$30-billion backlog of secured capital projects, spanning liquid pipelines, gas transmission, gas distribution, storage and renewables, with in-service dates extending through 2029.
Approximately 98% of Enbridge’s EBITDA is supported by regulated or take-or-pay contracts, and more than 80% of its profits come from businesses with built-in inflation protection, allowing the company to raise tariffs or fees as costs rise. This structure helps protect earnings and dividends even in a high-inflation environment.
Despite the resilience of Enbridge’s business model, challenges remain. The company’s debt-to-capitalization ratio of 60.4% is higher than the industry average of 57.7%, and its debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 4.8X sits near the upper end of management’s target range. Elevated leverage increases sensitivity to prolonged high interest rates and may limit financial flexibility if growth opportunities slow.
Earnings Estimate Revisions
Earnings momentum also favors caution. Over the past week, Zacks Consensus Estimates for Cenovus’ 2025 and 2026 earnings have declined, reflecting growing concern over oil price weakness.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Meanwhile, Enbridge’s estimates have been unchanged, modestly favoring the pipeline operator from a near-term stability perspective.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Valuation Comparison
From a valuation standpoint, investors appear willing to pay a premium for Enbridge’s stable midstream business model. ENB trades at a trailing 12-month EV/EBITDA of 15.37X, well above Cenovus’ 6.32X, indicating that much of Enbridge’s defensive appeal may already be priced in.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Final Verdict: Avoid or Sell Both Stocks for Now
While Cenovus offers higher upside potential in a strong oil price environment, the current soft crude outlook makes its upstream-heavy business model vulnerable. Enbridge, despite its stable cash flows, faces leverage-related risks and trades at a relatively elevated valuation.
As a result, risk-averse investors may want to avoid initiating positions in either stock at this time. Investors already holding ENB, with a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell), or CVE, carrying a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), may consider trimming or exiting positions until fundamentals and macro conditions improve.