This is our short term rating system that serves as a timeliness indicator for stocks over the next 1 to 3 months. How good is it? See rankings and related performance below.
|Zacks Rank||Definition||Annualized Return|
Zacks Rank Education - Learn more about the Zacks Rank
Zacks Rank Home - All Zacks Rank resources in one place
Zacks Premium - The only way to get access to the Zacks Rank
This page is temporarily not available. Please check later as it should be available shortly. If you have any questions, please email customer support at firstname.lastname@example.org or call 800-767-3771 ext. 9339.
Zacks highlights commentary from People and Picks Member «TickerBandit».
For more Voice of the People, visit http://at.zacks.com/?id=7872
Featured PostMy present thoughts ....
OK .... so now that we have had some earnest kick back ... it should be clear that a signficant bottom is forming. Will there be weakness ahead? I think this outcome is likely. I would give the probability of a new low roughly the same probability of new highs ... roughly 70%. So near term a new low ... or a test for a new low .... is likely ... but no means necessary ... AND intermediate term new highs are also likely ... by my estimation.
Near term weakness could be played a couple of ways with likelyhood of success. One is abstenance, (less than full exposure than one's tolerance for bull market exposure ... a trade of opportunity), the other is a hedge. I do not recommend puts primarily because I consider them a speculation tool rather than purely a hedge. The difference between buying options and selling options is that the some of the risk of the seller is conveyed to the buyer of the option in the form of the option's time value. After repeated hedges, the seller of the covered call VASTLY outperforms the buyer of puts. The seller of the covered call doesn't buy his protection ... he sells it ... and his only risk is one of opportunity and the risk of holding the underlying security (which is reduced by selling the call). Aligning oneself to higher probability outcomes is the "road to success"
Lets cover that last sentence in a little more detail. How about aligning oneself to gain from a free-fall crash? Is that a good decision? I would argue that it is not and PARTICULARLY with puts. First, it is a very low probability proposition. That is clearly obvious from the historical record, they happen infrequently. But what does happen frequently is the "anticipation of" a free-fall crash. So last Friday, it just seemed inevitable ... but "historically" the statistics support a rally instead ... if only because ... a free fall crash was widely anticipated.
So how low can we go? Only the market will tell us. The fact is, I can't rule out Mighty Myth's ultimate scenario. Probability exists for any conceivable outcome. But what I can say is that historically, his proposition has little support. The market conditions which normally pre-empt bear markets were not present during the recent top. Ultimately I think intraday 10300 to 10400 (DJIA) will prove to be the bottom of this correction. And I think we will come to know this period by a name, just like we named the "Asian Contagion". And just like the "Asian Contagion", I think this period will be followed by a very strong BULL MARKET rally. Were I to position for the alternate outcome, I would be taking a position not statistically supported as likely ... much like Mighty Myth did by loading up on top of a losing position in puts.
Ultimately we find our own way in the world and such it must be with each of us. Beware falling into the mass psychology trap. Strong bull markets arise from extreme pessimism and presently sentiment about the prospects of the economy and our nation are near levels of March 2009. Right now is the time, IMHO, to be planning one's future exposure to an upcoming bull market rally, and that is but one of the ways I am making my way through the world.
Happy Trading, TB
The most recent picks by «TickerBandit» are:
A buy rating on Advance Auto Parts ([url=http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/aap]AAP[/url]),
a buy rating on Alexion Pharma ([url=http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/alxn]ALXN[/url]) and
a buy rating on Solera Holdings ([url=http://www.zacks.com/stock/quote/slh]SLH[/url]).
In 2008, Zacks Investment Research launched PeopleAndPicks.com, a stock-picking website where members of the Zacks community can test their strategies and share ideas with other members. Each user is scored on the accuracy of his or her picks, and top users are rewarded with free products from Zacks. Registration is free. To learn more about People And Picks, visit http://at.zacks.com/?id=7870
Follow us on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/PeopleAndPicksAbout Zacks
Zacks.com is a property of Zacks Investment Research, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leonard Zacks. As a PhD in mathematics Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the Zacks Rank, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3:1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit From the Pros by going to http://at.zacks.com/?id=7867.
Please login to Zacks.com or register to post a comment.